Characterizing Online Engagement with Disinformation and Conspiracies in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.08319v1
• Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2021 22:11:13 GMT
• Title: Characterizing Online Engagement with Disinformation and Conspiracies in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election
• Authors: Karishma Sharma and Emilio Ferrara and Yan Liu
• Abstract summary: Persistent manipulation of social media has resulted in increased concerns regarding the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. We apply a detection model to separate factual from unreliable (or conspiratorial) claims analyzing a dataset of 242 million election-related tweets. We characterize account engagements with unreliable and conspiracy tweets, and with the QAnon conspiracy group, by political leaning and tweet types.
• Score: 9.63004143218094
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Identifying and characterizing disinformation in political discourse on social media is critical to ensure the integrity of elections and democratic processes around the world. Persistent manipulation of social media has resulted in increased concerns regarding the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election, due to its potential to influence individual opinions and social dynamics. In this work, we focus on the identification of distorted facts, in the form of unreliable and conspiratorial narratives in election-related tweets, to characterize discourse manipulation prior to the election. We apply a detection model to separate factual from unreliable (or conspiratorial) claims analyzing a dataset of 242 million election-related tweets. The identified claims are used to investigate targeted topics of disinformation, and conspiracy groups, most notably the far-right QAnon conspiracy group. Further, we characterize account engagements with unreliable and conspiracy tweets, and with the QAnon conspiracy group, by political leaning and tweet types. Finally, using a regression discontinuity design, we investigate whether Twitter's actions to curb QAnon activity on the platform were effective, and how QAnon accounts adapt to Twitter's restrictions.

Related papers

• ElectionRumors2022: A Dataset of Election Rumors on Twitter During the 2022 US Midterms [2.284479493171312]
  We present and analyze a dataset of 1.81 million Twitter posts corresponding to 135 distinct rumors which spread online during the midterm election season. We also conduct a mixed-methods analysis of three distinct rumors about the election in Arizona, a particularly prominent focus of 2022 election rumoring.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-22T21:02:26Z)
• Russo-Ukrainian War: Prediction and explanation of Twitter suspension [47.61306219245444]
  This study focuses on the Twitter suspension mechanism and the analysis of shared content and features of user accounts that may lead to this. We have obtained a dataset containing 107.7M tweets, originating from 9.8 million users, using Twitter API. Our results reveal scam campaigns taking advantage of trending topics regarding the Russia-Ukrainian conflict for Bitcoin fraud, spam, and advertisement campaigns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T08:41:02Z)
• Design and analysis of tweet-based election models for the 2021 Mexican legislative election [55.41644538483948]
  We use a dataset of 15 million election-related tweets in the six months preceding election day. We find that models using data with geographical attributes determine the results of the election with better precision and accuracy than conventional polling methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-02T12:40:05Z)
• Political Communities on Twitter: Case Study of the 2022 French Presidential Election [14.783829037950984]
  We aim to identify political communities formed on Twitter during the 2022 French presidential election. We create a large-scale Twitter dataset containing 1.2 million users and 62.6 million tweets that mention keywords relevant to the election. We perform community detection on a retweet graph of users and propose an in-depth analysis of the stance of each community.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-15T12:18:16Z)
• Comparing the Language of QAnon-related content on Parler, Gab, and Twitter [68.8204255655161]
  Parler, a "free speech" platform popular with conservatives, was taken offline in January 2021 due to the lack of moderation of hateful and QAnon- and other conspiracy-related content. We compare posts with the hashtag #QAnon on Parler over a month-long period with posts on Twitter and Gab. Gab has the highest proportion of #QAnon posts with hate terms, and Parler and Twitter are similar in this respect. On all three platforms, posts mentioning female political figures, Democrats, or Donald Trump have more anti-social language than posts mentioning male politicians, Republicans, or
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-22T11:19:15Z)
• Shifting Polarization and Twitter News Influencers between two U.S. Presidential Elections [92.33485580547801]
  We analyze the change of polarization between the 2016 and 2020 U.S. presidential elections. Most of the top influencers were affiliated with media organizations during both elections. 75% of the top influencers in 2020 were not present in 2016, demonstrating that such status is difficult to retain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-03T20:08:54Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Rise of QAnon: A Mental Model of Good and Evil Stews in an Echochamber [0.0]
  The QAnon conspiracy posits that Satan-worshiping Democrats operate a covert child sex-trafficking operation. We report two computational studies examining the social network structure and semantic content of tweets produced by users central to the early QAnon network on Twitter.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T19:34:35Z)
• Inferring Political Preferences from Twitter [0.0]
  Political Sentiment Analysis of social media helps the political strategists to scrutinize the performance of a party or candidate. During the time of elections, the social networks get flooded with blogs, chats, debates and discussions about the prospects of political parties and politicians. In this work, we chose to identify the inclination of political opinions present in Tweets by modelling it as a text classification problem using classical machine learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-21T05:20:43Z)
• How Twitter Data Sampling Biases U.S. Voter Behavior Characterizations [6.364128212193265]
  Recent studies reveal the existence of inauthentic actors such as malicious social bots and trolls. In this paper, we aim to close this gap using Twitter data from the 2018 U.S. midterm elections. We show that hyperactive accounts are more likely to exhibit various suspicious behaviors and share low-credibility information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-02T08:33:30Z)
• Russian trolls speaking Russian: Regional Twitter operations and MH17 [68.8204255655161]
  In 2018, Twitter released data on accounts identified as Russian trolls. We analyze the Russian-language operations of these trolls. We find that trolls' information campaign on the MH17 crash was the largest in terms of tweet count.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-13T19:48:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.