The False COVID-19 Narratives That Keep Being Debunked: A Spatiotemporal Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.12303v3
• Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 13:28:43 GMT
• Title: The False COVID-19 Narratives That Keep Being Debunked: A Spatiotemporal Analysis
• Authors: Iknoor Singh, Kalina Bontcheva, Carolina Scarton,
• Abstract summary: This study examines the database of CoronaVirusFacts Alliance, which contains 10,381 debunks related to COVID-19. We find that similar or nearly duplicate false COVID-19 narratives have been spreading in multiple modalities and on various social media platforms in different countries. We propose the idea of including a multilingual debunk search tool in the fact-checking pipeline.
• Score: 6.315106341032209
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic led to a global infodemic that has brought unprecedented challenges for citizens, media, and fact-checkers worldwide. To address this challenge, over a hundred fact-checking initiatives worldwide have been monitoring the information space in their countries and publishing regular debunks of viral false COVID-19 narratives. This study examines the database of the CoronaVirusFacts Alliance, which contains 10,381 debunks related to COVID-19 published in multiple languages by different fact-checking organisations. Our spatiotemporal analysis reveals that similar or nearly duplicate false COVID-19 narratives have been spreading in multiple modalities and on various social media platforms in different countries, sometimes as much as several months after the first debunk of that narrative has been published by an International Fact-checking Network (IFCN) fact-checker. We also find that misinformation involving general medical advice has spread across multiple countries and hence has the highest proportion of false COVID-19 narratives that keep being debunked. Furthermore, as manual fact-checking is an onerous task in itself, therefore the need to repeatedly debunk the same narrative in different countries is leading, over time, to a significant waste of fact-checker resources. To this end, we propose the idea of including a multilingual debunk search tool in the fact-checking pipeline, in addition to recommending strongly that social media platforms need to adopt the same technology at scale, so as to make the best use of scarce fact-checker resources.

Related papers

• Lost in Translation -- Multilingual Misinformation and its Evolution [52.07628580627591]
  This paper investigates the prevalence and dynamics of multilingual misinformation through an analysis of over 250,000 unique fact-checks spanning 95 languages. We find that while the majority of misinformation claims are only fact-checked once, 11.7%, corresponding to more than 21,000 claims, are checked multiple times. Using fact-checks as a proxy for the spread of misinformation, we find 33% of repeated claims cross linguistic boundaries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-27T12:21:55Z)
• "COVID-19 was a FIFA conspiracy #curropt": An Investigation into the Viral Spread of COVID-19 Misinformation [60.268682953952506]
  We estimate the extent to which misinformation has influenced the course of the COVID-19 pandemic using natural language processing models. We provide a strategy to combat social media posts that are likely to cause widespread harm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-12T19:41:01Z)
• Cross-lingual COVID-19 Fake News Detection [54.125563009333995]
  We make the first attempt to detect COVID-19 misinformation in a low-resource language (Chinese) only using the fact-checked news in a high-resource language (English) We propose a deep learning framework named CrossFake to jointly encode the cross-lingual news body texts and capture the news content. Empirical results on our dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of CrossFake under the cross-lingual setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T04:44:02Z)
• Can online attention signals help fact-checkers fact-check? [11.65819327593072]
  This paper proposes a framework to study fact-checking with online attention signals. We use this framework to conduct a preliminary study of a dataset of 879 COVID-19-related fact-checks done in 2020 by 81 international organizations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-20T06:51:59Z)
• Transformer based Automatic COVID-19 Fake News Detection System [9.23545668304066]
  Misinformation is especially prevalent in the ongoing coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. We report a methodology to analyze the reliability of information shared on social media pertaining to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our system obtained 0.9855 f1-score on testset and ranked 5th among 160 teams.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-01T06:49:27Z)
• Misinformation Has High Perplexity [55.47422012881148]
  We propose to leverage the perplexity to debunk false claims in an unsupervised manner. First, we extract reliable evidence from scientific and news sources according to sentence similarity to the claims. Second, we prime a language model with the extracted evidence and finally evaluate the correctness of given claims based on the perplexity scores at debunking time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-08T15:13:44Z)
• Cross-lingual Transfer Learning for COVID-19 Outbreak Alignment [90.12602012910465]
  We train on Italy's early COVID-19 outbreak through Twitter and transfer to several other countries. Our experiments show strong results with up to 0.85 Spearman correlation in cross-country predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-05T02:04:25Z)
• An Exploratory Study of COVID-19 Misinformation on Twitter [5.070542698701158]
  During the COVID-19 pandemic, social media has become a home ground for misinformation. We have conducted an exploratory study into the propagation, authors and content of misinformation on Twitter around the topic of COVID-19.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-12T12:07:35Z)
• HoaxItaly: a collection of Italian disinformation and fact-checking stories shared on Twitter in 2019 [72.96986027203377]
  The dataset includes also title and body for approximately 37k news articles. It is publicly available at https://doi.org/10.79DVN/ PGVDHX.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-29T16:14:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.