Design-Driven Requirements for Computationally Co-Creative Game AI Design Tools

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.13738v1
• Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 04:14:53 GMT
• Title: Design-Driven Requirements for Computationally Co-Creative Game AI Design Tools
• Authors: Nathan Partlan, Erica Kleinman, Jim Howe, Sabbir Ahmad, Stacy Marsella, Magy Seif El-Nasr
• Abstract summary: We present a participatory design study that categorizes and analyzes game AI designers' goals, expectations for such tools. We evince deep connections between game AI design and the design of co-creative tools, and present implications for future co-creativity tool research and development.
• Score: 6.719205507619887
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Game AI designers must manage complex interactions between the AI character, the game world, and the player, while achieving their design visions. Computational co-creativity tools can aid them, but first, AI and HCI researchers must gather requirements and determine design heuristics to build effective co-creative tools. In this work, we present a participatory design study that categorizes and analyzes game AI designers' workflows, goals, and expectations for such tools. We evince deep connections between game AI design and the design of co-creative tools, and present implications for future co-creativity tool research and development.

Related papers

• Survey of User Interface Design and Interaction Techniques in Generative AI Applications [79.55963742878684]
  We aim to create a compendium of different user-interaction patterns that can be used as a reference for designers and developers alike. We also strive to lower the entry barrier for those attempting to learn more about the design of generative AI applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T23:10:06Z)
• What's Next? Exploring Utilization, Challenges, and Future Directions of AI-Generated Image Tools in Graphic Design [2.0616038498705858]
  This study conducted semi-structured interviews with seven designers of varying experience levels to understand their current usage, challenges, and future needs for AI-generated image tools in graphic design. As our findings suggest, AI tools serve as creative partners in design, enhancing human creativity, offering strategic insights, and fostering team collaboration and communication. The findings provide guiding recommendations for the future development of AI-generated image tools, aimed at helping engineers optimize these tools to better meet the needs of graphic designers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T10:51:56Z)
• I-Design: Personalized LLM Interior Designer [57.00412237555167]
  I-Design is a personalized interior designer that allows users to generate and visualize their design goals through natural language communication. I-Design starts with a team of large language model agents that engage in dialogues and logical reasoning with one another. The final design is then constructed in 3D by retrieving and integrating assets from an existing object database.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-03T16:17:53Z)
• Geometric Deep Learning for Computer-Aided Design: A Survey [85.79012726689511]
  This survey offers a comprehensive overview of learning-based methods in computer-aided design. It includes similarity analysis and retrieval, 2D and 3D CAD model synthesis, and CAD generation from point clouds. It provides a complete list of benchmark datasets and their characteristics, along with open-source codes that have propelled research in this domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T17:11:35Z)
• Grasping AI: experiential exercises for designers [8.95562850825636]
  We investigate techniques for exploring and reflecting on the interactional affordances, the unique relational possibilities, and the wider social implications of AI systems. We find that exercises around metaphors and enactments make questions of training and learning, privacy and consent, autonomy and agency more tangible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T15:34:08Z)
• Exploring Challenges and Opportunities to Support Designers in Learning to Co-create with AI-based Manufacturing Design Tools [31.685493295306387]
  AI-based design tools are proliferating in professional software to assist engineering and industrial designers in complex manufacturing and design tasks. These tools take on more agentic roles than traditional computer-aided design tools and are often portrayed as "co-creators" To date, we know little about how engineering designers learn to work with AI-based design tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-01T02:57:05Z)
• Investigating Positive and Negative Qualities of Human-in-the-Loop Optimization for Designing Interaction Techniques [55.492211642128446]
  Designers reportedly struggle with design optimization tasks where they are asked to find a combination of design parameters that maximizes a given set of objectives. Model-based computational design algorithms assist designers by generating design examples during design. Black box methods for assistance, on the other hand, can work with any design problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-15T20:40:43Z)
• Stakeholder Participation in AI: Beyond "Add Diverse Stakeholders and Stir" [76.44130385507894]
  This paper aims to ground what we dub a 'participatory turn' in AI design by synthesizing existing literature on participation and through empirical analysis of its current practices. Based on our literature synthesis and empirical research, this paper presents a conceptual framework for analyzing participatory approaches to AI design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-01T17:57:04Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• Towards A Process Model for Co-Creating AI Experiences [16.767362787750418]
  Thinking of technology as a design material is appealing to designers. As a material, AI resists this approach because its properties emerge as part of the design process itself. We investigate the co-creation process through a design study with 10 pairs of designers and engineers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-15T16:53:34Z)
• Guru, Partner, or Pencil Sharpener? Understanding Designers' Attitudes Towards Intelligent Creativity Support Tools [4.812445272764651]
  Creativity Support Tools (CST) aim to enhance human creativity, but the deeply personal and subjective nature of creativity makes the design of universal support tools challenging. Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) techniques could provide a means of creating 'intelligent' CST which learn and adapt to personal styles of creativity. This paper details the results of a survey of professional designers which indicates a positive and pragmatic attitude towards collaborating with AI tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-09T14:52:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.