A Decision Model for Decentralized Autonomous Organization Platform
Selection: Three Industry Case Studies
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.14093v1
- Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 10:05:56 GMT
- Title: A Decision Model for Decentralized Autonomous Organization Platform
Selection: Three Industry Case Studies
- Authors: Elena Baninemeh (1), Siamak Farshidi (2), Slinger Jansen (1) ((1)
Department of Information and Computer Science at Utrecht University,
Utrecht, the Netherlands, (2) Informatics Institute at University of
Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands)
- Abstract summary: Decentralized autonomous organizations as a new form of online governance arecollections of smart contracts deployed on a blockchain platform.
This study presents a decision model as a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making problem for the decentralized autonomous organization platform selection problem.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Decentralized autonomous organizations as a new form of online governance
arecollections of smart contracts deployed on a blockchain platform that
intercede groupsof people. A growing number of Decentralized Autonomous
Organization Platforms,such as Aragon and Colony, have been introduced in the
market to facilitate thedevelopment process of such organizations. Selecting
the best fitting platform ischallenging for the organizations, as a significant
number of decision criteria, such aspopularity, developer availability,
governance issues, and consistent documentation ofsuch platforms, should be
considered. Additionally, decision-makers at theorganizations are not experts
in every domain, so they must continuously acquirevolatile knowledge regarding
such platforms and keep themselves updated.Accordingly, a decision model is
required to analyze the decision criteria usingsystematic identification and
evaluation of potential alternative solutions for adevelopment project. We have
developed a theoretical framework to assist softwareengineers with a set of
Multi-Criteria Decision-Making problems in software production.This study
presents a decision model as a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making problem forthe
decentralized autonomous organization platform selection problem. Weconducted
three industry case studies in the context of three decentralizedautonomous
organizations to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the decisionmodel
in assisting decision-makers.
Related papers
- DeLLMa: A Framework for Decision Making Under Uncertainty with Large Language Models [31.77731889916652]
DeLLMa is a framework designed to enhance decision-making accuracy in uncertain environments.
We show that DeLLMa can consistently enhance the decision-making performance of leading language models, and achieve up to a 40% increase in accuracy over competing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-04T08:11:45Z) - A hierarchical control framework for autonomous decision-making systems:
Integrating HMDP and MPC [9.74561942059487]
This paper proposes a comprehensive hierarchical control framework for autonomous decision-making arising in robotics and autonomous systems.
It addresses the intricate interplay between traditional continuous systems dynamics utilized at the low levels for control design and discrete Markov decision processes (MDP) for facilitating high-level decision making.
The proposed framework is applied to develop an autonomous lane changing system for intelligent vehicles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-12T15:25:51Z) - Risk-reducing design and operations toolkit: 90 strategies for managing
risk and uncertainty in decision problems [65.268245109828]
This paper develops a catalog of such strategies and develops a framework for them.
It argues that they provide an efficient response to decision problems that are seemingly intractable due to high uncertainty.
It then proposes a framework to incorporate them into decision theory using multi-objective optimization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-06T16:14:32Z) - Rational Decision-Making Agent with Internalized Utility Judgment [91.80700126895927]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable advancements and have attracted significant efforts to develop LLMs into agents capable of executing intricate multi-step decision-making tasks beyond traditional NLP applications.
This paper proposes RadAgent, which fosters the development of its rationality through an iterative framework involving Experience Exploration and Utility Learning.
Experimental results on the ToolBench dataset demonstrate RadAgent's superiority over baselines, achieving over 10% improvement in Pass Rate on diverse tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-24T03:11:45Z) - NLP-based Decision Support System for Examination of Eligibility
Criteria from Securities Prospectuses at the German Central Bank [0.0]
The German Central Bank receives hundreds of scanned prospectuses in PDF format, which must be manually processed to decide upon their eligibility.
We found that this tedious and time-consuming process can be (semi-automated) by employing modern NLP model architectures.
The proposed Decision Support System provides decisions of document-level eligibility criteria accompanied by human-understandable explanations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-09T11:00:58Z) - On solving decision and risk management problems subject to uncertainty [91.3755431537592]
Uncertainty is a pervasive challenge in decision and risk management.
This paper develops a systematic understanding of such strategies, determine their range of application, and develop a framework to better employ them.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-18T19:16:23Z) - Causal Fairness Analysis [68.12191782657437]
We introduce a framework for understanding, modeling, and possibly solving issues of fairness in decision-making settings.
The main insight of our approach will be to link the quantification of the disparities present on the observed data with the underlying, and often unobserved, collection of causal mechanisms.
Our effort culminates in the Fairness Map, which is the first systematic attempt to organize and explain the relationship between different criteria found in the literature.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-23T01:06:34Z) - Design principles for a hybrid intelligence decision support system for
business model validation [4.127347156839169]
This paper develops design principles for a Hybrid Intelligence decision support system (HI-DSS)
We follow a design science research approach to design a prototype artifact and a set of design principles.
Our study provides prescriptive knowledge for HI-DSS and contributes to previous work on decision support for business models, the applications of complementary strengths of humans and machines for making decisions, and support systems for extremely uncertain decision-making problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-07T16:13:36Z) - Leveraging Expert Consistency to Improve Algorithmic Decision Support [62.61153549123407]
We explore the use of historical expert decisions as a rich source of information that can be combined with observed outcomes to narrow the construct gap.
We propose an influence function-based methodology to estimate expert consistency indirectly when each case in the data is assessed by a single expert.
Our empirical evaluation, using simulations in a clinical setting and real-world data from the child welfare domain, indicates that the proposed approach successfully narrows the construct gap.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-24T05:40:29Z) - Decentralized Reinforcement Learning: Global Decision-Making via Local
Economic Transactions [80.49176924360499]
We establish a framework for directing a society of simple, specialized, self-interested agents to solve sequential decision problems.
We derive a class of decentralized reinforcement learning algorithms.
We demonstrate the potential advantages of a society's inherent modular structure for more efficient transfer learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-05T16:41:09Z) - Contestable Black Boxes [10.552465253379134]
This paper investigates the type of assurances that are needed in the contesting process when algorithmic black-boxes are involved.
We argue that specialised complementary methodologies to evaluate automated decision-making in the case of a particular decision being contested need to be developed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-09T09:09:00Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.