Risk-reducing design and operations toolkit: 90 strategies for managing risk and uncertainty in decision problems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.03133v1
• Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2023 16:14:32 GMT
• Title: Risk-reducing design and operations toolkit: 90 strategies for managing risk and uncertainty in decision problems
• Authors: Alexander Gutfraind
• Abstract summary: This paper develops a catalog of such strategies and develops a framework for them. It argues that they provide an efficient response to decision problems that are seemingly intractable due to high uncertainty. It then proposes a framework to incorporate them into decision theory using multi-objective optimization.
• Score: 65.268245109828
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Uncertainty is a pervasive challenge in decision analysis, and decision theory recognizes two classes of solutions: probabilistic models and cognitive heuristics. However, engineers, public planners and other decision-makers instead use a third class of strategies that could be called RDOT (Risk-reducing Design and Operations Toolkit). These include incorporating robustness into designs, contingency planning, and others that do not fall into the categories of probabilistic models or cognitive heuristics. Moreover, identical strategies appear in several domains and disciplines, pointing to an important shared toolkit. The focus of this paper is to develop a catalog of such strategies and develop a framework for them. The paper finds more than 90 examples of such strategies falling into six broad categories and argues that they provide an efficient response to decision problems that are seemingly intractable due to high uncertainty. It then proposes a framework to incorporate them into decision theory using multi-objective optimization. Overall, RDOT represents an overlooked class of responses to uncertainty. Because RDOT strategies do not depend on accurate forecasting or estimation, they could be applied fruitfully to certain decision problems affected by high uncertainty and make them much more tractable.

Related papers

• Ensembling Portfolio Strategies for Long-Term Investments: A Distribution-Free Preference Framework for Decision-Making and Algorithms [0.0]
  This paper investigates the problem of ensembling multiple strategies for sequential portfolios to outperform individual strategies in terms of long-term wealth. We introduce a novel framework for decision-making in combining strategies, irrespective of market conditions. We show results in favor of the proposed strategies, albeit with small tradeoffs in their Sharpe ratios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T23:08:57Z)
• ABI Approach: Automatic Bias Identification in Decision-Making Under Risk based in an Ontology of Behavioral Economics [46.57327530703435]
  Risk seeking preferences for losses, driven by biases such as loss aversion, pose challenges and can result in severe negative consequences. This research introduces the ABI approach, a novel solution designed to support organizational decision-makers by automatically identifying and explaining risk seeking preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T23:53:46Z)
• LLM as a Mastermind: A Survey of Strategic Reasoning with Large Language Models [75.89014602596673]
  Strategic reasoning requires understanding and predicting adversary actions in multi-agent settings while adjusting strategies accordingly. We explore the scopes, applications, methodologies, and evaluation metrics related to strategic reasoning with Large Language Models. It underscores the importance of strategic reasoning as a critical cognitive capability and offers insights into future research directions and potential improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T16:50:54Z)
• K-Level Reasoning: Establishing Higher Order Beliefs in Large Language Models for Strategic Reasoning [76.3114831562989]
  It requires Large Language Model (LLM) agents to adapt their strategies dynamically in multi-agent environments. We propose a novel framework: "K-Level Reasoning with Large Language Models (K-R)"
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T16:07:05Z)
• StrategyLLM: Large Language Models as Strategy Generators, Executors, Optimizers, and Evaluators for Problem Solving [76.5322280307861]
  StrategyLLM allows LLMs to perform inductive reasoning, deriving general strategies from specific task instances, and deductive reasoning, applying these general strategies to particular task examples, for constructing generalizable and consistent few-shot prompts. Experimental results demonstrate that StrategyLLM outperforms the competitive baseline CoT-SC that requires human-annotated solutions on 13 datasets across 4 challenging tasks without human involvement, including math reasoning (34.2% $rightarrow$ 38.8%), commonsense reasoning (70.3% $rightarrow$ 72.5%), algorithmic reasoning (73.7% $rightarrow$ 85.0
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T09:18:09Z)
• On solving decision and risk management problems subject to uncertainty [91.3755431537592]
  Uncertainty is a pervasive challenge in decision and risk management. This paper develops a systematic understanding of such strategies, determine their range of application, and develop a framework to better employ them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-18T19:16:23Z)
• Strategic Decisions Survey, Taxonomy, and Future Directions from Artificial Intelligence Perspective [15.649335092388897]
  We develop a systematic taxonomy of decision-making frames that consists of 6 bases, 18 categorical, and 54 frames. Compared with traditional models, it covers irrational, non-rational and rational frames c dealing with certainty, uncertainty, complexity, ambiguity, chaos, and ignorance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-22T07:01:10Z)
• Autoencoders for strategic decision support [5.922780668675565]
  We introduce and extend the use of autoencoders to provide strategically relevant granular feedback. A first experiment indicates that experts are inconsistent in their decision making, highlighting the need for strategic decision support. Our study confirms several principal weaknesses of human decision-making and stresses the importance of synergy between a model and humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-03T12:54:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.