Extending LIME for Business Process Automation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2108.04371v1
• Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 21:30:46 GMT
• Title: Extending LIME for Business Process Automation
• Authors: Sohini Upadhyay, Vatche Isahagian, Vinod Muthusamy, Yara Rizk
• Abstract summary: Business process applications have ordering or constraints on tasks that cause lightweight, model-agnostic, existing explanation methods like LIME to fail. We propose a local explanation framework extending LIME for explaining AI business process applications.
• Score: 2.5470840043956886
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: AI business process applications automate high-stakes business decisions where there is an increasing demand to justify or explain the rationale behind algorithmic decisions. Business process applications have ordering or constraints on tasks and feature values that cause lightweight, model-agnostic, existing explanation methods like LIME to fail. In response, we propose a local explanation framework extending LIME for explaining AI business process applications. Empirical evaluation of our extension underscores the advantage of our approach in the business process setting.

Related papers

• WISE: Unraveling Business Process Metrics with Domain Knowledge [0.0]
  Anomalies in complex industrial processes are often obscured by high variability and complexity of event data. We introduce WISE, a novel method for analyzing business process metrics through the integration of domain knowledge, process mining, and machine learning. We show that WISE enhances automation in business process analysis and effectively detects deviations from desired process flows.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T07:57:08Z)
• Towards a Benchmark for Causal Business Process Reasoning with LLMs [2.273531916003657]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for boosting organizational efficiency and automating tasks. Recent efforts have further extended to employ LLMs in activities such as reasoning, planning, and decision-making. In this work, we plant the seeds for the development of a benchmark to assess the ability of LLMs to reason about causal and process perspectives of business operations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-08T16:10:53Z)
• WESE: Weak Exploration to Strong Exploitation for LLM Agents [95.6720931773781]
  This paper proposes a novel approach, Weak Exploration to Strong Exploitation (WESE) to enhance LLM agents in solving open-world interactive tasks. WESE involves decoupling the exploration and exploitation process, employing a cost-effective weak agent to perform exploration tasks for global knowledge. A knowledge graph-based strategy is then introduced to store the acquired knowledge and extract task-relevant knowledge, enhancing the stronger agent in success rate and efficiency for the exploitation task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T03:31:54Z)
• The Foundations of Computational Management: A Systematic Approach to Task Automation for the Integration of Artificial Intelligence into Existing Workflows [55.2480439325792]
  This article introduces Computational Management, a systematic approach to task automation. The article offers three easy step-by-step procedures to begin the process of implementing AI within a workflow.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T01:45:14Z)
• Extracting Process-Aware Decision Models from Object-Centric Process Data [54.04724730771216]
  This paper proposes the first object-centric decision-mining algorithm called Integrated Object-centric Decision Discovery Algorithm (IODDA) IODDA is able to discover how a decision is structured as well as how a decision is made.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-26T13:27:35Z)
• Clarify When Necessary: Resolving Ambiguity Through Interaction with LMs [58.620269228776294]
  We propose a task-agnostic framework for resolving ambiguity by asking users clarifying questions. We evaluate systems across three NLP applications: question answering, machine translation and natural language inference. We find that intent-sim is robust, demonstrating improvements across a wide range of NLP tasks and LMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T00:18:50Z)
• A Methodology and Software Architecture to Support Explainability-by-Design [0.0]
  This paper describes Explainability-by-Design, a holistic methodology characterised by proactive measures to include explanation capability in the design of decision-making systems. The methodology consists of three phases: (A) Explanation Requirement Analysis, (B) Explanation Technical Design, and (C) Explanation Validation. It was shown that the approach is tractable in terms of development time, which can be as low as two hours per sentence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-13T15:34:29Z)
• Inverse Online Learning: Understanding Non-Stationary and Reactionary Policies [79.60322329952453]
  We show how to develop interpretable representations of how agents make decisions. By understanding the decision-making processes underlying a set of observed trajectories, we cast the policy inference problem as the inverse to this online learning problem. We introduce a practical algorithm for retrospectively estimating such perceived effects, alongside the process through which agents update them. Through application to the analysis of UNOS organ donation acceptance decisions, we demonstrate that our approach can bring valuable insights into the factors that govern decision processes and how they change over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-14T17:40:42Z)
• Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Process Mining: A General Overview and Application of a Novel Local Explanation Approach for Predictive Process Monitoring [0.0]
  This study proposes a conceptual framework sought to establish and promote understanding of decision-making environment. This study defines the local regions from the validation dataset by using the intermediate latent space representations. The adopted deep learning classifier achieves a good performance with the Area Under the ROC Curve of 0.94.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-04T10:28:56Z)
• Learning to Infer User Hidden States for Online Sequential Advertising [52.169666997331724]
  We propose our Deep Intents Sequential Advertising (DISA) method to address these issues. The key part of interpretability is to understand a consumer's purchase intent which is, however, unobservable (called hidden states)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-03T05:12:26Z)
• AI Trust in business processes: The need for process-aware explanations [11.161025675113208]
  Business process management (BPM) literature is rich in machine learning solutions. Deep learning models including those from the NLP domain have been applied to process predictions. We assert that a large reason for the lack of adoption of AI models in BPM is that business users are risk-averse and do not implicitly trust AI models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-21T13:51:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.