An Early Look at the Gettr Social Network

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2108.05876v1
• Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 17:49:30 GMT
• Title: An Early Look at the Gettr Social Network
• Authors: Pujan Paudel, Jeremy Blackburn, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Savvas Zannettou, and Gianluca Stringhini
• Abstract summary: We find that users on the platform heavily discuss politics, with a focus on the Trump campaign in the US and Bolsonaro's in Brazil. Although toxicity has been increasing over time, the average level of toxicity is still lower than the one recently observed on other fringe social networks like Gab and 4chan.
• Score: 11.319938541673578
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This paper presents the first data-driven analysis of Gettr, a new social network platform launched by former US President Donald Trump's team. Among other things, we find that users on the platform heavily discuss politics, with a focus on the Trump campaign in the US and Bolsonaro's in Brazil. Activity on the platform has steadily been decreasing since its launch, although a core of verified users and early adopters kept posting and become central to it. Finally, although toxicity has been increasing over time, the average level of toxicity is still lower than the one recently observed on other fringe social networks like Gab and 4chan. Overall, we provide a first quantitative look at this new community, observing a lack of organic engagement and activity.

Related papers

• Characterization of Political Polarized Users Attacked by Language Toxicity on Twitter [3.0367864044156088]
  This study aims to provide a first exploration of the potential language toxicity flow among Left, Right and Center users. More than 500M Twitter posts were examined. It was discovered that Left users received much more toxic replies than Right and Center users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T10:49:47Z)
• Twits, Toxic Tweets, and Tribal Tendencies: Trends in Politically Polarized Posts on Twitter [5.161088104035108]
  We explore the role that partisanship and affective polarization play in contributing to toxicity on an individual level and a topic level on Twitter/X. After collecting 89.6 million tweets from 43,151 Twitter/X users, we determine how several account-level characteristics, including partisanship, predict how often users post toxic content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-19T17:24:47Z)
• Design and analysis of tweet-based election models for the 2021 Mexican legislative election [55.41644538483948]
  We use a dataset of 15 million election-related tweets in the six months preceding election day. We find that models using data with geographical attributes determine the results of the election with better precision and accuracy than conventional polling methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-02T12:40:05Z)
• Trust and Believe -- Should We? Evaluating the Trustworthiness of Twitter Users [5.695742189917657]
  Fake news on social media is a major problem with far-reaching negative repercussions on both individuals and society. In this work, we create a model through which we hope to offer a solution that will instill trust in social network communities. Our model analyses the behaviour of 50,000 politicians on Twitter and assigns an influence score for each evaluated user.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-27T06:57:19Z)
• Comparing the Language of QAnon-related content on Parler, Gab, and Twitter [68.8204255655161]
  Parler, a "free speech" platform popular with conservatives, was taken offline in January 2021 due to the lack of moderation of hateful and QAnon- and other conspiracy-related content. We compare posts with the hashtag #QAnon on Parler over a month-long period with posts on Twitter and Gab. Gab has the highest proportion of #QAnon posts with hate terms, and Parler and Twitter are similar in this respect. On all three platforms, posts mentioning female political figures, Democrats, or Donald Trump have more anti-social language than posts mentioning male politicians, Republicans, or
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-22T11:19:15Z)
• Annotators with Attitudes: How Annotator Beliefs And Identities Bias Toxic Language Detection [75.54119209776894]
  We investigate the effect of annotator identities (who) and beliefs (why) on toxic language annotations. We consider posts with three characteristics: anti-Black language, African American English dialect, and vulgarity. Our results show strong associations between annotator identity and beliefs and their ratings of toxicity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-15T18:58:20Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Debate on Online Social Networks at the Time of COVID-19: An Italian Case Study [4.176752121302988]
  We analyze how the interaction patterns around popular influencers in Italy changed during the first six months of 2020. We collected a large dataset for this group of public figures, including more than 54 million comments on over 140 thousand posts. We also analyze the user sentiment through the psycholinguistic properties of comments, and the results testified the rapid boom and disappearance of topics related to the pandemic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-02T08:25:19Z)
• An Early Look at the Parler Online Social Network [10.683059193632943]
  Parler is an "alternative" social network promoting itself as a service that allows to "speak freely and express yourself openly" This paper presents a dataset of 183M Parler posts made by 4M users between August 2018 and January 2021, as well as metadata from 13.25M user profiles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-11T11:23:19Z)
• Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
  We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms. We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features. We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)
• Leveraging Multi-Source Weak Social Supervision for Early Detection of Fake News [67.53424807783414]
  Social media has greatly enabled people to participate in online activities at an unprecedented rate. This unrestricted access also exacerbates the spread of misinformation and fake news online which might cause confusion and chaos unless being detected early for its mitigation. We jointly leverage the limited amount of clean data along with weak signals from social engagements to train deep neural networks in a meta-learning framework to estimate the quality of different weak instances. Experiments on realworld datasets demonstrate that the proposed framework outperforms state-of-the-art baselines for early detection of fake news without using any user engagements at prediction time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-03T18:26:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.