ACM-CR: A Manually Annotated Test Collection for Citation Recommendation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2108.07571v1
• Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 11:51:51 GMT
• Title: ACM-CR: A Manually Annotated Test Collection for Citation Recommendation
• Abstract summary: Citation recommendation is intended to assist researchers in the process of searching for relevant papers to cite. Existing test collections for this task are noisy and unreliable since they are built automatically from parsed PDF papers. We present our ongoing effort at creating a publicly available, manually annotated test collection for citation recommendation.
• Score: 6.599344783327053
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Citation recommendation is intended to assist researchers in the process of searching for relevant papers to cite by recommending appropriate citations for a given input text. Existing test collections for this task are noisy and unreliable since they are built automatically from parsed PDF papers. In this paper, we present our ongoing effort at creating a publicly available, manually annotated test collection for citation recommendation. We also conduct a series of experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of content-based baseline models on the test collection, providing results for future work to improve upon. Our test collection and code to replicate experiments are available at https://github.com/boudinfl/acm-cr

Related papers

• AutoResearch: An Execution-Grounded Multi-Agent Framework for Reliable Research Workflow Automation [8.807417226975081]
  AutoResearch is an execution-grounded multi-agent framework for reliable research workflow automation.<n>System treats errors, citation-verification failures, and review-agent feedback as practical filtering signals for generated research artifacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-04T08:24:21Z)
• HalluCiteChecker: A Lightweight Toolkit for Hallucinated Citation Detection and Verification in the Era of AI Scientists [58.87954687016989]
  HalluCiteChecker is a toolkit for detecting and verifying hallucinated citations in scientific papers.<n>Our code is released under the Apache 2.0 license on GitHub and is distributed as an installable package via PyPI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-29T16:01:42Z)
• CiteAudit: You Cited It, But Did You Read It? A Benchmark for Verifying Scientific References in the LLM Era [51.63024682584688]
  Large language models (LLMs) introduce a new risk: fabricated references that appear plausible but correspond to no real publications.<n>We present the first comprehensive benchmark and detection framework for hallucinated citations in scientific writing.<n>Our framework significantly outperforms prior methods in both accuracy and interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-26T19:17:39Z)
• VeriCite: Towards Reliable Citations in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Rigorous Verification [107.75781898355562]
  We introduce a novel framework, called VeriCite, designed to rigorously validate supporting evidence and enhance answer attribution.<n>We conduct experiments across five open-source LLMs and four datasets, demonstrating that VeriCite can significantly improve citation quality while maintaining the correctness of the answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T13:38:54Z)
• Cite Pretrain: Retrieval-Free Knowledge Attribution for Large Language Models [53.17363502535395]
  Trustworthy language models should provide both correct and verifiable answers.<n>Current systems insert citations by querying an external retriever at inference time.<n>We propose Active Indexing, which continually pretrains on synthetic QA pairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-21T04:48:05Z)
• REANIMATOR: Reanimate Retrieval Test Collections with Extracted and Synthetic Resources [1.1309478649967237]
  We introduce REANIMATOR, a versatile framework designed to enable the repurposing of existing test collections. It enhances test collections from PDF files by parsing full texts and machine-readable tables. It then employs state-of-the-art large language models to produce synthetic relevance labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T09:25:11Z)
• SelfCite: Self-Supervised Alignment for Context Attribution in Large Language Models [51.90867482317985]
  SelfCite is a self-supervised approach to generate fine-grained, sentence-level citations for statements in generated responses.<n>The effectiveness of SelfCite is demonstrated by increasing citation F1 up to 5.3 points on the LongBench-Cite benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-13T18:55:13Z)
• ILCiteR: Evidence-grounded Interpretable Local Citation Recommendation [31.259805200946175]
  We introduce the evidence-grounded local citation recommendation task, where the target latent space comprises evidence spans for recommending specific papers. Unlike past formulations that simply output recommendations, ILCiteR retrieves ranked lists of evidence span and recommended paper pairs. We contribute a novel dataset for the evidence-grounded local citation recommendation task and demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed conditional neural rank-ensembling approach for re-ranking evidence spans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T17:38:05Z)
• CiteBench: A benchmark for Scientific Citation Text Generation [69.37571393032026]
  CiteBench is a benchmark for citation text generation. We make the code for CiteBench publicly available at https://github.com/UKPLab/citebench.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-19T16:10:56Z)
• Does Recommend-Revise Produce Reliable Annotations? An Analysis on Missing Instances in DocRED [60.39125850987604]
  We show that a textit-revise scheme results in false negative samples and an obvious bias towards popular entities and relations. The relabeled dataset is released to serve as a more reliable test set of document RE models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-17T11:29:01Z)
• Towards generating citation sentences for multiple references with intent control [86.53829532976303]
  We build a novel generation model with the Fusion-in-Decoder approach to cope with multiple long inputs. Experiments demonstrate that the proposed approaches provide much more comprehensive features for generating citation sentences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-02T15:32:24Z)
• A Token-level Reference-free Hallucination Detection Benchmark for Free-form Text Generation [50.55448707570669]
  We propose a novel token-level, reference-free hallucination detection task and an associated annotated dataset named HaDes. To create this dataset, we first perturb a large number of text segments extracted from English language Wikipedia, and then verify these with crowd-sourced annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-18T04:09:48Z)
• CSFCube -- A Test Collection of Computer Science Research Articles for Faceted Query by Example [43.01717754418893]
  We introduce the task of faceted Query by Example. Users can also specify a finer grained aspect in addition to the input query document. We envision models which are able to retrieve scientific papers analogous to a query scientific paper.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-24T01:02:12Z)
• Summary-Source Proposition-level Alignment: Task, Datasets and Supervised Baseline [94.0601799665342]
  Aligning sentences in a reference summary with their counterparts in source documents was shown as a useful auxiliary summarization task. We propose establishing summary-source alignment as an explicit task, while introducing two major novelties. We create a novel training dataset for proposition-level alignment, derived automatically from available summarization evaluation data. We present a supervised proposition alignment baseline model, showing improved alignment-quality over the unsupervised approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-01T17:27:12Z)
• Learning Neural Textual Representations for Citation Recommendation [7.227232362460348]
  We propose a novel approach to citation recommendation using a deep sequential representation of the documents (Sentence-BERT) cascaded with Siamese and triplet networks in a submodular scoring function. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first approach to combine deep representations and submodular selection for a task of citation recommendation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-08T12:38:50Z)
• Context-Based Quotation Recommendation [60.93257124507105]
  We propose a novel context-aware quote recommendation system. It generates a ranked list of quotable paragraphs and spans of tokens from a given source document. We conduct experiments on a collection of speech transcripts and associated news articles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-17T17:49:53Z)
• HybridCite: A Hybrid Model for Context-Aware Citation Recommendation [0.0]
  We develop citation recommendation approaches based on embeddings, topic modeling, and information retrieval techniques. We combine, for the first time to the best of our knowledge, the best-performing algorithms into a semi-genetic hybrid recommender system. Our evaluation results show that a hybrid model containing embedding and information retrieval-based components outperforms its individual components and further algorithms by a large margin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-15T16:19:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.