Morality-based Assertion and Homophily on Social Media: A Cultural Comparison between English and Japanese Languages

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2108.10643v1
• Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 11:07:46 GMT
• Title: Morality-based Assertion and Homophily on Social Media: A Cultural Comparison between English and Japanese Languages
• Authors: Maneet Singh, Rishemjit Kaur, Akiko Matsuo, S.R.S. Iyengar and Kazutoshi Sasahara
• Abstract summary: We used the social media platform Twitter for comparing the moral behaviors of Japanese users with English users. The tweets from Japanese users depicted relatively higher Fairness, Ingroup and Purity. As far as emotions related to morality are concerned, the English tweets expressed more positive emotions for all moral dimensions.
• Score: 8.22469542459168
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Moral psychology is a domain that deals with moral identity, appraisals and emotions. Previous work has greatly focused on moral development and the associated role of culture. Knowing that language is an inherent element of a culture, we used the social media platform Twitter for comparing the moral behaviors of Japanese users with English users. The five basic moral foundations i.e., Care, Fairness, Ingroup, Authority and Purity, along with the associated emotional valence are compared for English and Japanese tweets. The tweets from Japanese users depicted relatively higher Fairness, Ingroup and Purity. As far as emotions related to morality are concerned, the English tweets expressed more positive emotions for all moral dimensions. Considering the role of moral similarities in connecting users on social media, we quantified homophily concerning different moral dimensions using our proposed method. The moral dimensions Care, Authority and Purity for English and Ingroup for Japanese depicted homophily on Twitter. Overall, our study uncovers the underlying cultural differences with respect to moral behavior in English and Japanese speaking users.

Related papers

• The Moral Foundations Weibo Corpus [0.0]
  Moral sentiments influence both online and offline environments, shaping behavioral styles and interaction patterns. Existing corpora, while valuable, often face linguistic limitations. This corpus consists of 25,671 Chinese comments on Weibo, encompassing six diverse topic areas.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-14T17:32:03Z)
• MoralBERT: A Fine-Tuned Language Model for Capturing Moral Values in Social Discussions [4.747987317906765]
  Moral values play a fundamental role in how we evaluate information, make decisions, and form judgements around important social issues. Recent advances in Natural Language Processing (NLP) show that moral values can be gauged in human-generated textual content. This paper introduces MoralBERT, a range of language representation models fine-tuned to capture moral sentiment in social discourse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T14:12:59Z)
• What Makes it Ok to Set a Fire? Iterative Self-distillation of Contexts and Rationales for Disambiguating Defeasible Social and Moral Situations [48.686872351114964]
  Moral or ethical judgments rely heavily on the specific contexts in which they occur. We introduce defeasible moral reasoning: a task to provide grounded contexts that make an action more or less morally acceptable. We distill a high-quality dataset of 1.2M entries of contextualizations and rationales for 115K defeasible moral actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T00:51:29Z)
• Knowledge of cultural moral norms in large language models [3.475552182166427]
  We investigate the extent to which monolingual English language models contain knowledge about moral norms in different countries. We perform our analyses with two public datasets from the World Values Survey and PEW global surveys on morality. We find that pre-trained English language models predict empirical moral norms across countries worse than the English moral norms reported previously.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-02T18:23:35Z)
• MoralDial: A Framework to Train and Evaluate Moral Dialogue Systems via Moral Discussions [71.25236662907056]
  A moral dialogue system aligned with users' values could enhance conversation engagement and user connections. We propose a framework, MoralDial, to train and evaluate moral dialogue systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-21T02:21:37Z)
• ClarifyDelphi: Reinforced Clarification Questions with Defeasibility Rewards for Social and Moral Situations [81.70195684646681]
  We present ClarifyDelphi, an interactive system that learns to ask clarification questions. We posit that questions whose potential answers lead to diverging moral judgments are the most informative. Our work is ultimately inspired by studies in cognitive science that have investigated the flexibility in moral cognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T16:33:09Z)
• Speaking Multiple Languages Affects the Moral Bias of Language Models [70.94372902010232]
  Pre-trained multilingual language models (PMLMs) are commonly used when dealing with data from multiple languages and cross-lingual transfer. Do the models capture moral norms from English and impose them on other languages? Our experiments demonstrate that, indeed, PMLMs encode differing moral biases, but these do not necessarily correspond to cultural differences or commonalities in human opinions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-14T20:08:54Z)
• A Corpus for Understanding and Generating Moral Stories [84.62366141696901]
  We propose two understanding tasks and two generation tasks to assess these abilities of machines. We present STORAL, a new dataset of Chinese and English human-written moral stories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-20T13:12:36Z)
• Identifying Morality Frames in Political Tweets using Relational Learning [27.047907641503762]
  Moral sentiment is motivated by its targets, which can correspond to individuals or collective entities. We introduce morality frames, a representation framework for organizing moral attitudes directed at different entities. We propose a relational learning model to predict moral attitudes towards entities and moral foundations jointly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-09T19:48:57Z)
• Aligning AI With Shared Human Values [85.2824609130584]
  We introduce the ETHICS dataset, a new benchmark that spans concepts in justice, well-being, duties, virtues, and commonsense morality. We find that current language models have a promising but incomplete ability to predict basic human ethical judgements. Our work shows that progress can be made on machine ethics today, and it provides a steppingstone toward AI that is aligned with human values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-05T17:59:16Z)
• Text-based inference of moral sentiment change [11.188112005462536]
  We present a text-based framework for investigating moral sentiment change of the public via longitudinal corpora. We build our methodology by exploring moral biases learned from diachronic word embeddings. Our work offers opportunities for applying natural language processing toward characterizing moral sentiment change in society.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-20T18:52:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.