Ensuring the Inclusive Use of Natural Language Processing in the Global Response to COVID-19

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2108.10791v1
• Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 12:54:26 GMT
• Title: Ensuring the Inclusive Use of Natural Language Processing in the Global Response to COVID-19
• Authors: Alexandra Sasha Luccioni, Katherine Hoffmann Pham, Cynthia Sin Nga Lam, Joseph Aylett-Bullock, Miguel Luengo-Oroz
• Abstract summary: We discuss ways in which current and future NLP approaches can be made more inclusive by covering low-resource languages. We suggest several future directions for researchers interested in maximizing the positive societal impacts of NLP.
• Score: 58.720142291102135
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Natural language processing (NLP) plays a significant role in tools for the COVID-19 pandemic response, from detecting misinformation on social media to helping to provide accurate clinical information or summarizing scientific research. However, the approaches developed thus far have not benefited all populations, regions or languages equally. We discuss ways in which current and future NLP approaches can be made more inclusive by covering low-resource languages, including alternative modalities, leveraging out-of-the-box tools and forming meaningful partnerships. We suggest several future directions for researchers interested in maximizing the positive societal impacts of NLP.

Related papers

• Multimodal Fusion with LLMs for Engagement Prediction in Natural Conversation [70.52558242336988]
  We focus on predicting engagement in dyadic interactions by scrutinizing verbal and non-verbal cues, aiming to detect signs of disinterest or confusion. In this work, we collect a dataset featuring 34 participants engaged in casual dyadic conversations, each providing self-reported engagement ratings at the end of each conversation. We introduce a novel fusion strategy using Large Language Models (LLMs) to integrate multiple behavior modalities into a multimodal transcript''
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-13T18:28:12Z)
• Towards Systematic Monolingual NLP Surveys: GenA of Greek NLP [2.3499129784547663]
  This study introduces a generalizable methodology for creating systematic and comprehensive monolingual NLP surveys. We apply this methodology to Greek NLP (2012-2023), providing a comprehensive overview of its current state and challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-13T12:01:52Z)
• The Ghanaian NLP Landscape: A First Look [9.17372840572907]
  Ghanaian languages, in particular, face an alarming decline, with documented extinction and several at risk. This study pioneers a comprehensive survey of Natural Language Processing (NLP) research focused on Ghanaian languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T21:39:09Z)
• Interactive Natural Language Processing [67.87925315773924]
  Interactive Natural Language Processing (iNLP) has emerged as a novel paradigm within the field of NLP. This paper offers a comprehensive survey of iNLP, starting by proposing a unified definition and framework of the concept.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T17:18:29Z)
• Efficient Methods for Natural Language Processing: A Survey [76.34572727185896]
  This survey synthesizes and relates current methods and findings in efficient NLP. We aim to provide both guidance for conducting NLP under limited resources, and point towards promising research directions for developing more efficient methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-31T20:32:35Z)
• Meta Learning for Natural Language Processing: A Survey [88.58260839196019]
  Deep learning has been the mainstream technique in natural language processing (NLP) area. Deep learning requires many labeled data and is less generalizable across domains. Meta-learning is an arising field in machine learning studying approaches to learn better algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-03T13:58:38Z)
• Systematic Inequalities in Language Technology Performance across the World's Languages [94.65681336393425]
  We introduce a framework for estimating the global utility of language technologies. Our analyses involve the field at large, but also more in-depth studies on both user-facing technologies and more linguistic NLP tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T14:03:07Z)
• Putting Humans in the Natural Language Processing Loop: A Survey [13.53277201606357]
  How can we design Natural Language Processing (NLP) systems that learn from human feedback? There is a growing research body of Human-in-the-loop (HITL) NLP frameworks that continuously integrate human feedback to improve the model itself. We present a survey of HITL NLP work from both Machine Learning (ML) and Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) communities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-06T06:26:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.