Dash: Semi-Supervised Learning with Dynamic Thresholding

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.00650v1
• Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 23:52:29 GMT
• Title: Dash: Semi-Supervised Learning with Dynamic Thresholding
• Authors: Yi Xu, Lei Shang, Jinxing Ye, Qi Qian, Yu-Feng Li, Baigui Sun, Hao Li, Rong Jin
• Abstract summary: We propose a semi-supervised learning (SSL) approach that uses unlabeled examples to train models. Our proposed approach, Dash, enjoys its adaptivity in terms of unlabeled data selection.
• Score: 72.74339790209531
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: While semi-supervised learning (SSL) has received tremendous attentions in many machine learning tasks due to its successful use of unlabeled data, existing SSL algorithms use either all unlabeled examples or the unlabeled examples with a fixed high-confidence prediction during the training progress. However, it is possible that too many correct/wrong pseudo labeled examples are eliminated/selected. In this work we develop a simple yet powerful framework, whose key idea is to select a subset of training examples from the unlabeled data when performing existing SSL methods so that only the unlabeled examples with pseudo labels related to the labeled data will be used to train models. The selection is performed at each updating iteration by only keeping the examples whose losses are smaller than a given threshold that is dynamically adjusted through the iteration. Our proposed approach, Dash, enjoys its adaptivity in terms of unlabeled data selection and its theoretical guarantee. Specifically, we theoretically establish the convergence rate of Dash from the view of non-convex optimization. Finally, we empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method in comparison with state-of-the-art over benchmarks.

Related papers

• Late Stopping: Avoiding Confidently Learning from Mislabeled Examples [61.00103151680946]
  We propose a new framework, Late Stopping, which leverages the intrinsic robust learning ability of DNNs through a prolonged training process. We empirically observe that mislabeled and clean examples exhibit differences in the number of epochs required for them to be consistently and correctly classified. Experimental results on benchmark-simulated and real-world noisy datasets demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art counterparts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-26T12:43:25Z)
• Boosting Semi-Supervised Learning by bridging high and low-confidence predictions [4.18804572788063]
  Pseudo-labeling is a crucial technique in semi-supervised learning (SSL) We propose a new method called ReFixMatch, which aims to utilize all of the unlabeled data during training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-15T00:27:18Z)
• Soft Curriculum for Learning Conditional GANs with Noisy-Labeled and Uncurated Unlabeled Data [70.25049762295193]
  We introduce a novel conditional image generation framework that accepts noisy-labeled and uncurated data during training. We propose soft curriculum learning, which assigns instance-wise weights for adversarial training while assigning new labels for unlabeled data. Our experiments show that our approach outperforms existing semi-supervised and label-noise robust methods in terms of both quantitative and qualitative performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-17T08:31:59Z)
• MaxMatch: Semi-Supervised Learning with Worst-Case Consistency [149.03760479533855]
  We propose a worst-case consistency regularization technique for semi-supervised learning (SSL) We present a generalization bound for SSL consisting of the empirical loss terms observed on labeled and unlabeled training data separately. Motivated by this bound, we derive an SSL objective that minimizes the largest inconsistency between an original unlabeled sample and its multiple augmented variants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-26T12:04:49Z)
• Active Learning by Feature Mixing [52.16150629234465]
  We propose a novel method for batch active learning called ALFA-Mix. We identify unlabelled instances with sufficiently-distinct features by seeking inconsistencies in predictions. We show that inconsistencies in these predictions help discovering features that the model is unable to recognise in the unlabelled instances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-14T12:20:54Z)
• Few-shot Learning via Dependency Maximization and Instance Discriminant Analysis [21.8311401851523]
  We study the few-shot learning problem, where a model learns to recognize new objects with extremely few labeled data per category. We propose a simple approach to exploit unlabeled data accompanying the few-shot task for improving few-shot performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-07T02:19:01Z)
• In Defense of Pseudo-Labeling: An Uncertainty-Aware Pseudo-label Selection Framework for Semi-Supervised Learning [53.1047775185362]
  Pseudo-labeling (PL) is a general SSL approach that does not have this constraint but performs relatively poorly in its original formulation. We argue that PL underperforms due to the erroneous high confidence predictions from poorly calibrated models. We propose an uncertainty-aware pseudo-label selection (UPS) framework which improves pseudo labeling accuracy by drastically reducing the amount of noise encountered in the training process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-15T23:29:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.