Causal Inference in Natural Language Processing: Estimation, Prediction,
Interpretation and Beyond
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.00725v1
- Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 05:40:08 GMT
- Title: Causal Inference in Natural Language Processing: Estimation, Prediction,
Interpretation and Beyond
- Authors: Amir Feder, Katherine A. Keith, Emaad Manzoor, Reid Pryzant, Dhanya
Sridhar, Zach Wood-Doughty, Jacob Eisenstein, Justin Grimmer, Roi Reichart,
Margaret E. Roberts, Brandon M. Stewart, Victor Veitch, Diyi Yang
- Abstract summary: We consolidate research across academic areas and situate it in the broader Natural Language Processing landscape.
We introduce the statistical challenge of estimating causal effects, encompassing settings where text is used as an outcome, treatment, or as a means to address confounding.
In addition, we explore potential uses of causal inference to improve the performance, robustness, fairness, and interpretability of NLP models.
- Score: 38.055142444836925
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: A fundamental goal of scientific research is to learn about causal
relationships. However, despite its critical role in the life and social
sciences, causality has not had the same importance in Natural Language
Processing (NLP), which has traditionally placed more emphasis on predictive
tasks. This distinction is beginning to fade, with an emerging area of
interdisciplinary research at the convergence of causal inference and language
processing. Still, research on causality in NLP remains scattered across
domains without unified definitions, benchmark datasets and clear articulations
of the remaining challenges. In this survey, we consolidate research across
academic areas and situate it in the broader NLP landscape. We introduce the
statistical challenge of estimating causal effects, encompassing settings where
text is used as an outcome, treatment, or as a means to address confounding. In
addition, we explore potential uses of causal inference to improve the
performance, robustness, fairness, and interpretability of NLP models. We thus
provide a unified overview of causal inference for the computational
linguistics community.
Related papers
- Causal Inference with Large Language Model: A Survey [5.651037052334014]
Causal inference has been a pivotal challenge across diverse domains such as medicine and economics.
Recent advancements in natural language processing (NLP) have introduced promising opportunities for traditional causal inference tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-15T18:43:11Z) - Zero-shot Causal Graph Extrapolation from Text via LLMs [50.596179963913045]
We evaluate the ability of large language models (LLMs) to infer causal relations from natural language.
LLMs show competitive performance in a benchmark of pairwise relations without needing (explicit) training samples.
We extend our approach to extrapolating causal graphs through iterated pairwise queries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-22T13:14:38Z) - Quantifying the Dialect Gap and its Correlates Across Languages [69.18461982439031]
This work will lay the foundation for furthering the field of dialectal NLP by laying out evident disparities and identifying possible pathways for addressing them through mindful data collection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-23T17:42:01Z) - Uncertainty in Natural Language Processing: Sources, Quantification, and
Applications [56.130945359053776]
We provide a comprehensive review of uncertainty-relevant works in the NLP field.
We first categorize the sources of uncertainty in natural language into three types, including input, system, and output.
We discuss the challenges of uncertainty estimation in NLP and discuss potential future directions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-05T06:46:53Z) - A Diachronic Analysis of Paradigm Shifts in NLP Research: When, How, and
Why? [84.46288849132634]
We propose a systematic framework for analyzing the evolution of research topics in a scientific field using causal discovery and inference techniques.
We define three variables to encompass diverse facets of the evolution of research topics within NLP.
We utilize a causal discovery algorithm to unveil the causal connections among these variables using observational data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-22T11:08:00Z) - CausalDialogue: Modeling Utterance-level Causality in Conversations [83.03604651485327]
We have compiled and expanded upon a new dataset called CausalDialogue through crowd-sourcing.
This dataset includes multiple cause-effect pairs within a directed acyclic graph (DAG) structure.
We propose a causality-enhanced method called Exponential Average Treatment Effect (ExMATE) to enhance the impact of causality at the utterance level in training neural conversation models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-20T18:31:50Z) - Assessing the Limits of the Distributional Hypothesis in Semantic
Spaces: Trait-based Relational Knowledge and the Impact of Co-occurrences [6.994580267603235]
This work contributes to the relatively untrodden path of what is required in data for models to capture meaningful representations of natural language.
This entails evaluating how well English and Spanish semantic spaces capture a particular type of relational knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-16T12:09:40Z) - Identifying Causal Influences on Publication Trends and Behavior: A Case
Study of the Computational Linguistics Community [10.791197825505755]
We present mixed-method analyses to investigate causal influences of publication trends and behavior.
Key findings highlight the transition to rapidly emerging methodologies in the research community.
We anticipate this work to provide useful insights about publication trends and behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-15T08:36:13Z) - We Need to Talk About Data: The Importance of Data Readiness in Natural
Language Processing [3.096615629099618]
We argue that there is a gap between academic research in NLP and its application to problems outside academia.
We propose a method for improving the communication between researchers and external stakeholders regarding the accessibility, validity, and utility of data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-11T17:55:07Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.