Causality for Natural Language Processing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.14530v1
• Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2025 08:11:11 GMT
• Title: Causality for Natural Language Processing
• Authors: Zhijing Jin,
• Abstract summary: Causal reasoning is a cornerstone of human intelligence and a critical capability for artificial systems.<n>This thesis delves into various dimensions of causal reasoning and understanding in large language models.
• Score: 17.681875945732042
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Causal reasoning is a cornerstone of human intelligence and a critical capability for artificial systems aiming to achieve advanced understanding and decision-making. This thesis delves into various dimensions of causal reasoning and understanding in large language models (LLMs). It encompasses a series of studies that explore the causal inference skills of LLMs, the mechanisms behind their performance, and the implications of causal and anticausal learning for natural language processing (NLP) tasks. Additionally, it investigates the application of causal reasoning in text-based computational social science, specifically focusing on political decision-making and the evaluation of scientific impact through citations. Through novel datasets, benchmark tasks, and methodological frameworks, this work identifies key challenges and opportunities to improve the causal capabilities of LLMs, providing a comprehensive foundation for future research in this evolving field.

Related papers

• A Call for New Recipes to Enhance Spatial Reasoning in MLLMs [85.67171333213301]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance in general vision-language tasks.<n>Recent studies have exposed critical limitations in their spatial reasoning capabilities.<n>This deficiency in spatial reasoning significantly constrains MLLMs' ability to interact effectively with the physical world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T11:48:39Z)
• A Survey on Enhancing Causal Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models [15.602788561902038]
  Large language models (LLMs) have recently shown remarkable performance in language tasks and beyond.<n>LLMs still face challenges in handling tasks that require robust causal reasoning ability, such as health-care and economic analysis.<n>This paper systematically reviews literature on how to strengthen LLMs' causal reasoning ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T12:20:31Z)
• An Overview of Large Language Models for Statisticians [109.38601458831545]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as transformative tools in artificial intelligence (AI)<n>This paper explores potential areas where statisticians can make important contributions to the development of LLMs.<n>We focus on issues such as uncertainty quantification, interpretability, fairness, privacy, watermarking and model adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T03:40:36Z)
• LogiDynamics: Unraveling the Dynamics of Logical Inference in Large Language Model Reasoning [49.58786377307728]
  This paper adopts an exploratory approach by introducing a controlled evaluation environment for analogical reasoning. We analyze the comparative dynamics of inductive, abductive, and deductive inference pipelines. We investigate advanced paradigms such as hypothesis selection, verification, and refinement, revealing their potential to scale up logical inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T15:54:53Z)
• Advancing Reasoning in Large Language Models: Promising Methods and Approaches [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have succeeded remarkably in various natural language processing (NLP) tasks.<n>Their ability to perform complex reasoning-spanning logical deduction, mathematical problem-solving, commonsense inference, and multi-step reasoning-often falls short of human expectations.<n>This survey provides a comprehensive review of emerging techniques enhancing reasoning in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-05T23:31:39Z)
• LLM Reasoning Engine: Specialized Training for Enhanced Mathematical Reasoning [7.512199306943756]
  We present a novel method to enhance Large Language Models' capabilities in mathematical reasoning tasks. Motivated by the need to bridge this gap, our approach incorporates a question paraphrase strategy. specialized training objectives are employed to guide the model's learning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-28T17:48:33Z)
• Decoding Large-Language Models: A Systematic Overview of Socio-Technical Impacts, Constraints, and Emerging Questions [1.1970409518725493]
  The article highlights the application areas that could have a positive impact on society along with the ethical considerations. It includes responsible development considerations, algorithmic improvements, ethical challenges, and societal implications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-25T14:36:30Z)
• Causal Inference with Large Language Model: A Survey [5.651037052334014]
  Causal inference has been a pivotal challenge across diverse domains such as medicine and economics.<n>Recent advancements in natural language processing (NLP) have introduced promising opportunities for traditional causal inference tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-15T18:43:11Z)
• Diagnostic Reasoning in Natural Language: Computational Model and Application [68.47402386668846]
  We investigate diagnostic abductive reasoning (DAR) in the context of language-grounded tasks (NL-DAR) We propose a novel modeling framework for NL-DAR based on Pearl's structural causal models. We use the resulting dataset to investigate the human decision-making process in NL-DAR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-09T06:55:37Z)
• Cognitive LLMs: Towards Integrating Cognitive Architectures and Large Language Models for Manufacturing Decision-making [51.737762570776006]
  LLM-ACTR is a novel neuro-symbolic architecture that provides human-aligned and versatile decision-making. Our framework extracts and embeds knowledge of ACT-R's internal decision-making process as latent neural representations. Our experiments on novel Design for Manufacturing tasks show both improved task performance as well as improved grounded decision-making capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-17T11:49:53Z)
• From Heuristic to Analytic: Cognitively Motivated Strategies for Coherent Physical Commonsense Reasoning [66.98861219674039]
  Heuristic-Analytic Reasoning (HAR) strategies drastically improve the coherence of rationalizations for model decisions. Our findings suggest that human-like reasoning strategies can effectively improve the coherence and reliability of PLM reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T19:46:04Z)
• Towards LogiGLUE: A Brief Survey and A Benchmark for Analyzing Logical Reasoning Capabilities of Language Models [56.34029644009297]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the ability to overcome various limitations of formal Knowledge Representation (KR) systems. LLMs excel most in abductive reasoning, followed by deductive reasoning, while they are least effective at inductive reasoning. We study single-task training, multi-task training, and "chain-of-thought" knowledge distillation fine-tuning technique to assess the performance of model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T01:00:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.