Risk Management of AI/ML Software as a Medical Device (SaMD): On ISO 14971 and Related Standards and Guidances

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.07905v1
• Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2021 04:30:15 GMT
• Title: Risk Management of AI/ML Software as a Medical Device (SaMD): On ISO 14971 and Related Standards and Guidances
• Authors: Stephen G. Odaibo
• Abstract summary: Safety and efficacy are the paramount objectives of medical device regulation. Risk management is the underlying principle that governs the regulation of medical devices. In this article, I review how Risk Management Standard ISO 14971: 2019 both connects with and serves as a foundation for the other parts of the Artificial Intelligence (AI)/Machine Learning (ML) SaMD regulatory framework.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Safety and efficacy are the paramount objectives of medical device regulation. And in line with the medical ethos of non-maleficence, first do no harm, safety is the primary goal of regulation also. As such, risk management is the underlying principle that governs the regulation of medical devices, whether traditional devices or Software as a Medical Device (SaMD). In this article, I review how Risk Management Standard ISO 14971:2019 both connects with and serves as a foundation for the other parts of the Artificial Intelligence (AI)/Machine Learning (ML) SaMD regulatory framework.

Related papers

• Defining and Evaluating Physical Safety for Large Language Models [62.4971588282174]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to control robotic systems such as drones. Their risks of causing physical threats and harm in real-world applications remain unexplored. We classify the physical safety risks of drones into four categories: (1) human-targeted threats, (2) object-targeted threats, (3) infrastructure attacks, and (4) regulatory violations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T17:41:25Z)
• Using AI Alignment Theory to understand the potential pitfalls of regulatory frameworks [55.2480439325792]
  This paper critically examines the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act) Uses insights from Alignment Theory (AT) research, which focuses on the potential pitfalls of technical alignment in Artificial Intelligence. As we apply these concepts to the EU AI Act, we uncover potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement in the regulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T17:38:38Z)
• Law-based and standards-oriented approach for privacy impact assessment in medical devices: a topic for lawyers, engineers and healthcare practitioners in MedTech [0.0]
  The adoption of non-binding standards like ISO and IEC can harmonize processes by enhancing accountability privacy by design. The study advocates for leveraging both hard law and standards to systematically address privacy and safety in the design and operation of medical devices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-18T09:56:19Z)
• AIR-Bench 2024: A Safety Benchmark Based on Risk Categories from Regulations and Policies [80.90138009539004]
  AIR-Bench 2024 is the first AI safety benchmark aligned with emerging government regulations and company policies. It decomposes 8 government regulations and 16 company policies into a four-tiered safety taxonomy with granular risk categories in the lowest tier. We evaluate leading language models on AIR-Bench 2024, uncovering insights into their alignment with specified safety concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T21:16:48Z)
• Securing the Future of GenAI: Policy and Technology [50.586585729683776]
  Governments globally are grappling with the challenge of regulating GenAI, balancing innovation against safety. A workshop co-organized by Google, University of Wisconsin, Madison, and Stanford University aimed to bridge this gap between GenAI policy and technology. This paper summarizes the discussions during the workshop which addressed questions, such as: How regulation can be designed without hindering technological progress?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T20:30:01Z)
• The risks of risk-based AI regulation: taking liability seriously [46.90451304069951]
  The development and regulation of AI seems to have reached a critical stage. Some experts are calling for a moratorium on the training of AI systems more powerful than GPT-4. This paper analyses the most advanced legal proposal, the European Union's AI Act.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T12:51:37Z)
• FUTURE-AI: International consensus guideline for trustworthy and deployable artificial intelligence in healthcare [73.78776682247187]
  Concerns have been raised about the technical, clinical, ethical and legal risks associated with medical AI. This work describes the FUTURE-AI guideline as the first international consensus framework for guiding the development and deployment of trustworthy AI tools in healthcare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-11T10:49:05Z)
• A hybrid Bayesian network for medical device risk assessment and management [0.0]
  ISO 14971 is the primary standard used for medical device risk management. It does not specify a particular method for performing risk management. We present a novel method for medical device risk management using hybrid Bayesian networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-07T08:02:13Z)
• Review of the AMLAS Methodology for Application in Healthcare [2.6072209210124675]
  There is a need to proactively assure the safety of ML to prevent patient safety being compromised. The Assurance of Machine Learning for use in Autonomous Systems methodology was developed by the Assuring Autonomy International Programme. This review has appraised the methodology by consulting ML manufacturers to understand if it converges or diverges from their current safety assurance practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-01T13:00:36Z)
• On Medical Device Software CE Compliance and Conformity Assessment [4.910937238451484]
  Manufacturing of medical devices is strictly controlled by authorities. Manufacturers must conform to the regulatory requirements of the region in which a medical device is being marketed for use. In general, these requirements make no difference between the physical device, embedded software running inside a physical device, or software that constitutes the device in itself.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-11T17:35:40Z)
• On Medical Device Cybersecurity Compliance in EU [4.3695508295565775]
  We review the new cybersecurity requirements in the light of currently available guidance documents. We argue that these core concepts form a foundations for cybersecurity compliance in the European Union regulatory framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-11T17:26:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.