A Comprehensive Overview of Recommender System and Sentiment Analysis
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.08794v1
- Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 01:08:41 GMT
- Title: A Comprehensive Overview of Recommender System and Sentiment Analysis
- Authors: Sumaia Mohammed AL-Ghuribi and Shahrul Azman Mohd Noah
- Abstract summary: This paper gives a comprehensive overview to help researchers who aim to work with recommender system and sentiment analysis.
It includes a background of the recommender system concept, including phases, approaches, and performance metrics used in recommender systems.
Then, it discusses the sentiment analysis concept and highlights the main points in the sentiment analysis, including level, approaches, and focuses on aspect-based sentiment analysis.
- Score: 1.370633147306388
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Recommender system has been proven to be significantly crucial in many fields
and is widely used by various domains. Most of the conventional recommender
systems rely on the numeric rating given by a user to reflect his opinion about
a consumed item; however, these ratings are not available in many domains. As a
result, a new source of information represented by the user-generated reviews
is incorporated in the recommendation process to compensate for the lack of
these ratings. The reviews contain prosperous and numerous information related
to the whole item or a specific feature that can be extracted using the
sentiment analysis field. This paper gives a comprehensive overview to help
researchers who aim to work with recommender system and sentiment analysis. It
includes a background of the recommender system concept, including phases,
approaches, and performance metrics used in recommender systems. Then, it
discusses the sentiment analysis concept and highlights the main points in the
sentiment analysis, including level, approaches, and focuses on aspect-based
sentiment analysis.
Related papers
- De-centering the (Traditional) User: Multistakeholder Evaluation of Recommender Systems [10.731079374109596]
We focus on the intricacies of the evaluation of multistakeholder recommender systems.
We discuss how to move from theoretical principles to practical implementation.
We aim to provide guidance to researchers and practitioners about how to think about these complex and domain-dependent issues of evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-09T11:44:49Z) - Whom do Explanations Serve? A Systematic Literature Survey of User Characteristics in Explainable Recommender Systems Evaluation [7.021274080378664]
We surveyed 124 papers in which recommender systems explanations were evaluated in user studies.
Our findings suggest that the results from the surveyed studies predominantly cover specific users.
We recommend actions to move toward a more inclusive and reproducible evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-12T13:01:30Z) - On the Biased Assessment of Expert Finding Systems [11.083396379885478]
In large organisations, identifying experts on a given topic is crucial in leveraging the internal knowledge spread across teams and departments.
This case study provides an analysis of how these recommendations can impact the evaluation of expert finding systems.
We show that system-validated annotations lead to overestimated performance of traditional term-based retrieval models.
We also augment knowledge areas with synonyms to uncover a strong bias towards literal mentions of their constituent words.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-07T13:19:08Z) - Review-based Recommender Systems: A Survey of Approaches, Challenges and Future Perspectives [11.835903510784735]
Review-based recommender systems have emerged as a significant sub-field in this domain.
We present a categorization of these systems and summarize the state-of-the-art methods, analyzing their unique features, effectiveness, and limitations.
We propose potential directions for future research, including the integration of multimodal data, multi-criteria rating information, and ethical considerations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-09T05:45:18Z) - Rethinking the Evaluation of Dialogue Systems: Effects of User Feedback on Crowdworkers and LLMs [57.16442740983528]
In ad-hoc retrieval, evaluation relies heavily on user actions, including implicit feedback.
The role of user feedback in annotators' assessment of turns in a conversational perception has been little studied.
We focus on how the evaluation of task-oriented dialogue systems ( TDSs) is affected by considering user feedback, explicit or implicit, as provided through the follow-up utterance of a turn being evaluated.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-19T16:45:50Z) - Impression-Aware Recommender Systems [53.48892326556546]
We present a systematic literature review on recommender systems using impressions.
We define a theoretical framework to delimit recommender systems using impressions and a novel paradigm for personalized recommendations, called impression-aware recommender systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-15T16:16:02Z) - Measuring "Why" in Recommender Systems: a Comprehensive Survey on the
Evaluation of Explainable Recommendation [87.82664566721917]
This survey is based on more than 100 papers from top-tier conferences like IJCAI, AAAI, TheWebConf, Recsys, UMAP, and IUI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-14T02:58:55Z) - Rating and aspect-based opinion graph embeddings for explainable
recommendations [69.9674326582747]
We propose to exploit embeddings extracted from graphs that combine information from ratings and aspect-based opinions expressed in textual reviews.
We then adapt and evaluate state-of-the-art graph embedding techniques over graphs generated from Amazon and Yelp reviews on six domains, outperforming baseline recommenders.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-07T14:07:07Z) - Graphing else matters: exploiting aspect opinions and ratings in
explainable graph-based recommendations [66.83527496838937]
We propose to exploit embeddings extracted from graphs that combine information from ratings and aspect-based opinions expressed in textual reviews.
We then adapt and evaluate state-of-the-art graph embedding techniques over graphs generated from Amazon and Yelp reviews on six domains.
Our approach has the advantage of providing explanations which leverage aspect-based opinions given by users about recommended items.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-07T13:57:28Z) - A Survey on Knowledge Graph-Based Recommender Systems [65.50486149662564]
We conduct a systematical survey of knowledge graph-based recommender systems.
We focus on how the papers utilize the knowledge graph for accurate and explainable recommendation.
We introduce datasets used in these works.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-28T02:26:30Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.