A Comprehensive Overview of Recommender System and Sentiment Analysis
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.08794v1
- Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 01:08:41 GMT
- Title: A Comprehensive Overview of Recommender System and Sentiment Analysis
- Authors: Sumaia Mohammed AL-Ghuribi and Shahrul Azman Mohd Noah
- Abstract summary: This paper gives a comprehensive overview to help researchers who aim to work with recommender system and sentiment analysis.
It includes a background of the recommender system concept, including phases, approaches, and performance metrics used in recommender systems.
Then, it discusses the sentiment analysis concept and highlights the main points in the sentiment analysis, including level, approaches, and focuses on aspect-based sentiment analysis.
- Score: 1.370633147306388
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Recommender system has been proven to be significantly crucial in many fields
and is widely used by various domains. Most of the conventional recommender
systems rely on the numeric rating given by a user to reflect his opinion about
a consumed item; however, these ratings are not available in many domains. As a
result, a new source of information represented by the user-generated reviews
is incorporated in the recommendation process to compensate for the lack of
these ratings. The reviews contain prosperous and numerous information related
to the whole item or a specific feature that can be extracted using the
sentiment analysis field. This paper gives a comprehensive overview to help
researchers who aim to work with recommender system and sentiment analysis. It
includes a background of the recommender system concept, including phases,
approaches, and performance metrics used in recommender systems. Then, it
discusses the sentiment analysis concept and highlights the main points in the
sentiment analysis, including level, approaches, and focuses on aspect-based
sentiment analysis.
Related papers
- Rethinking the Evaluation of Dialogue Systems: Effects of User Feedback on Crowdworkers and LLMs [57.16442740983528]
In ad-hoc retrieval, evaluation relies heavily on user actions, including implicit feedback.
The role of user feedback in annotators' assessment of turns in a conversational perception has been little studied.
We focus on how the evaluation of task-oriented dialogue systems ( TDSs) is affected by considering user feedback, explicit or implicit, as provided through the follow-up utterance of a turn being evaluated.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-19T16:45:50Z) - Impression-Aware Recommender Systems [57.38537491535016]
Novel data sources bring new opportunities to improve the quality of recommender systems.
Researchers may use impressions to refine user preferences and overcome the current limitations in recommender systems research.
We present a systematic literature review on recommender systems using impressions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-15T16:16:02Z) - Explainable Recommender with Geometric Information Bottleneck [25.703872435370585]
We propose to incorporate a geometric prior learnt from user-item interactions into a variational network.
Latent factors from an individual user-item pair can be used for both recommendation and explanation generation.
Experimental results on three e-commerce datasets show that our model significantly improves the interpretability of a variational recommender.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-09T10:38:36Z) - Measuring "Why" in Recommender Systems: a Comprehensive Survey on the
Evaluation of Explainable Recommendation [87.82664566721917]
This survey is based on more than 100 papers from top-tier conferences like IJCAI, AAAI, TheWebConf, Recsys, UMAP, and IUI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-14T02:58:55Z) - Social Fraud Detection Review: Methods, Challenges and Analysis [42.30892608083864]
Social reviews have dominated the web and become a plausible source of product information.
Business make use of social information to spread fake information using a single user, groups of users, or a bot trained to generate fraudulent content.
Many studies proposed approaches based on user behaviors and review text to address the challenges of fraud detection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-10T11:25:20Z) - Rating and aspect-based opinion graph embeddings for explainable
recommendations [69.9674326582747]
We propose to exploit embeddings extracted from graphs that combine information from ratings and aspect-based opinions expressed in textual reviews.
We then adapt and evaluate state-of-the-art graph embedding techniques over graphs generated from Amazon and Yelp reviews on six domains, outperforming baseline recommenders.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-07T14:07:07Z) - Graphing else matters: exploiting aspect opinions and ratings in
explainable graph-based recommendations [66.83527496838937]
We propose to exploit embeddings extracted from graphs that combine information from ratings and aspect-based opinions expressed in textual reviews.
We then adapt and evaluate state-of-the-art graph embedding techniques over graphs generated from Amazon and Yelp reviews on six domains.
Our approach has the advantage of providing explanations which leverage aspect-based opinions given by users about recommended items.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-07T13:57:28Z) - Arabic Opinion Mining Using a Hybrid Recommender System Approach [0.0]
This research focuses on Arabic reviews, where the model is evaluated using Opinion Corpus for Arabic dataset.
Our system was efficient, and it showed a good accuracy of nearly 85 percent in predicting rating from reviews.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-16T00:21:56Z) - How Useful are Reviews for Recommendation? A Critical Review and
Potential Improvements [8.471274313213092]
We investigate a growing body of work that seeks to improve recommender systems through the use of review text.
Our initial findings reveal several discrepancies in reported results, partly due to copying results across papers despite changes in experimental settings or data pre-processing.
Further investigation calls for discussion on a much larger problem about the "importance" of user reviews for recommendation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-25T16:30:05Z) - A Survey on Knowledge Graph-Based Recommender Systems [65.50486149662564]
We conduct a systematical survey of knowledge graph-based recommender systems.
We focus on how the papers utilize the knowledge graph for accurate and explainable recommendation.
We introduce datasets used in these works.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-28T02:26:30Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.