Federated Deep Learning with Bayesian Privacy

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.13012v1
• Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 12:48:40 GMT
• Title: Federated Deep Learning with Bayesian Privacy
• Authors: Hanlin Gu, Lixin Fan, Bowen Li, Yan Kang, Yuan Yao and Qiang Yang
• Abstract summary: Federated learning (FL) aims to protect data privacy by cooperatively learning a model without sharing private data among users. Homomorphic encryption (HE) based methods provide secure privacy protections but suffer from extremely high computational and communication overheads. Deep learning with Differential Privacy (DP) was implemented as a practical learning algorithm at a manageable cost in complexity.
• Score: 28.99404058773532
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Federated learning (FL) aims to protect data privacy by cooperatively learning a model without sharing private data among users. For Federated Learning of Deep Neural Network with billions of model parameters, existing privacy-preserving solutions are unsatisfactory. Homomorphic encryption (HE) based methods provide secure privacy protections but suffer from extremely high computational and communication overheads rendering it almost useless in practice . Deep learning with Differential Privacy (DP) was implemented as a practical learning algorithm at a manageable cost in complexity. However, DP is vulnerable to aggressive Bayesian restoration attacks as disclosed in the literature and demonstrated in experimental results of this work. To address the aforementioned perplexity, we propose a novel Bayesian Privacy (BP) framework which enables Bayesian restoration attacks to be formulated as the probability of reconstructing private data from observed public information. Specifically, the proposed BP framework accurately quantifies privacy loss by Kullback-Leibler (KL) Divergence between the prior distribution about the privacy data and the posterior distribution of restoration private data conditioning on exposed information}. To our best knowledge, this Bayesian Privacy analysis is the first to provides theoretical justification of secure privacy-preserving capabilities against Bayesian restoration attacks. As a concrete use case, we demonstrate that a novel federated deep learning method using private passport layers is able to simultaneously achieve high model performance, privacy-preserving capability and low computational complexity. Theoretical analysis is in accordance with empirical measurements of information leakage extensively experimented with a variety of DNN networks on image classification MNIST, CIFAR10, and CIFAR100 datasets.

Related papers

• Pseudo-Probability Unlearning: Towards Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Machine Unlearning [59.29849532966454]
  We propose PseudoProbability Unlearning (PPU), a novel method that enables models to forget data to adhere to privacy-preserving manner. Our method achieves over 20% improvements in forgetting error compared to the state-of-the-art.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T21:27:06Z)
• Investigating Privacy Attacks in the Gray-Box Setting to Enhance Collaborative Learning Schemes [7.651569149118461]
  We study privacy attacks in the gray-box setting, where the attacker has only limited access to the model. We deploy SmartNNCrypt, a framework that tailors homomorphic encryption to protect the portions of the model posing higher privacy risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-25T18:49:21Z)
• Initialization Matters: Privacy-Utility Analysis of Overparameterized Neural Networks [72.51255282371805]
  We prove a privacy bound for the KL divergence between model distributions on worst-case neighboring datasets. We find that this KL privacy bound is largely determined by the expected squared gradient norm relative to model parameters during training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T16:13:22Z)
• PrivacyMind: Large Language Models Can Be Contextual Privacy Protection Learners [81.571305826793]
  We introduce Contextual Privacy Protection Language Models (PrivacyMind) Our work offers a theoretical analysis for model design and benchmarks various techniques. In particular, instruction tuning with both positive and negative examples stands out as a promising method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T22:37:01Z)
• Privacy-Preserving Distributed Expectation Maximization for Gaussian Mixture Model using Subspace Perturbation [4.2698418800007865]
  federated learning is motivated by the privacy concern as it does not allow to transmit private data but only intermediate updates. We propose a fully decentralized privacy-preserving solution, which is able to securely compute the updates in each step. Numerical validation shows that the proposed approach has superior performance compared to the existing approach in terms of both the accuracy and privacy level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-16T09:58:03Z)
• Is Vertical Logistic Regression Privacy-Preserving? A Comprehensive Privacy Analysis and Beyond [57.10914865054868]
  We consider vertical logistic regression (VLR) trained with mini-batch descent gradient. We provide a comprehensive and rigorous privacy analysis of VLR in a class of open-source Federated Learning frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-19T05:47:30Z)
• Understanding Clipping for Federated Learning: Convergence and Client-Level Differential Privacy [67.4471689755097]
  This paper empirically demonstrates that the clipped FedAvg can perform surprisingly well even with substantial data heterogeneity. We provide the convergence analysis of a differential private (DP) FedAvg algorithm and highlight the relationship between clipping bias and the distribution of the clients' updates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T14:47:19Z)
• PEARL: Data Synthesis via Private Embeddings and Adversarial Reconstruction Learning [1.8692254863855962]
  We propose a new framework of data using deep generative models in a differentially private manner. Within our framework, sensitive data are sanitized with rigorous privacy guarantees in a one-shot fashion. Our proposal has theoretical guarantees of performance, and empirical evaluations on multiple datasets show that our approach outperforms other methods at reasonable levels of privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-08T18:00:01Z)
• Robustness Threats of Differential Privacy [70.818129585404]
  We experimentally demonstrate that networks, trained with differential privacy, in some settings might be even more vulnerable in comparison to non-private versions. We study how the main ingredients of differentially private neural networks training, such as gradient clipping and noise addition, affect the robustness of the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-14T18:59:24Z)
• Rethinking Privacy Preserving Deep Learning: How to Evaluate and Thwart Privacy Attacks [31.34410250008759]
  This paper measures the trade-off between model accuracy and privacy losses incurred by reconstruction, tracing and membership attacks. Experiments show that model accuracies are improved on average by 5-20% compared with baseline mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-20T15:48:57Z)
• SPEED: Secure, PrivatE, and Efficient Deep learning [2.283665431721732]
  We introduce a deep learning framework able to deal with strong privacy constraints. Based on collaborative learning, differential privacy and homomorphic encryption, the proposed approach advances state-of-the-art.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-16T19:31:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.