Targeted Ads and/as Racial Discrimination: Exploring Trends in New York City Ads for College Scholarships

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.15294v1
• Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 17:39:22 GMT
• Title: Targeted Ads and/as Racial Discrimination: Exploring Trends in New York City Ads for College Scholarships
• Authors: Ho-Chun Herbert Chang, Matt Bui, and Charlton McIlwain
• Abstract summary: This paper uses and recycles data from a third-party digital marketing firm to explore how targeted ads contribute to larger systems of racial discrimination. It discusses data visualizations and mappings of trends in the advertisements' targeted populations alongside U.S census data corresponding to these target zipcodes.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper uses and recycles data from a third-party digital marketing firm, to explore how targeted ads contribute to larger systems of racial discrimination. Focusing on a case study of targeted ads for educational searches in New York City, it discusses data visualizations and mappings of trends in the advertisements' targeted populations alongside U.S census data corresponding to these target zipcodes. We summarize and reflect on the results to consider how internet platforms systemically and differentially target advertising messages to users based on race; the tangible harms and risks that result from an internet traffic system designed to discriminate; and finally, novel approaches and frameworks for further auditing systems amid opaque, black-boxed processes forestalling transparency and accountability.

Related papers

• External Evaluation of Discrimination Mitigation Efforts in Meta's Ad Delivery [47.418845064441605]
  We show that the Variance Reduction System (VRS) implemented by Meta does not meaningfully improve access to opportunities for individuals.<n>We then conduct experiments to evaluate VRS with real-world ads, and show that while VRS does reduce variance, it also raises advertiser costs.<n>We show our approach outperforms VRS by both increasing ad exposure for users from all groups and reducing cost to advertisers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-19T19:29:26Z)
• Against Opacity: Explainable AI and Large Language Models for Effective Digital Advertising [45.512178197258066]
  Meta Ads and Googles of the world attract countless advertisers who rely on intuition, with billions of dollars lost on ineffective social media ads.<n>This lack of transparency hinders the advertisers' ability to make informed decisions and necessitates efforts to promote transparency, standardize industry metrics, and strengthen regulatory frameworks.<n>In this work, we propose novel ways to assist marketers in optimizing their advertising strategies via machine learning techniques designed to analyze and evaluate content, in particular, predict the click-through rates (CTR) of novel advertising content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-22T08:46:47Z)
• On the Use of Proxies in Political Ad Targeting [49.61009579554272]
  We show that major political advertisers circumvented mitigations by targeting proxy attributes. Our findings have crucial implications for the ongoing discussion on the regulation of political advertising.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T17:15:13Z)
• Digital Advertising in a Post-Cookie World: Charting the Impact of Google's Topics API [0.38233569758620056]
  Integrating Google's Topics API into the digital advertising ecosystem represents a significant shift toward privacy-conscious advertising practices. This article analyses the implications of implementing Topics API on ad networks, focusing on competition dynamics and ad space accessibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-21T09:04:16Z)
• Auditing for Racial Discrimination in the Delivery of Education Ads [50.37313459134418]
  We propose a new third-party auditing method that can evaluate racial bias in the delivery of ads for education opportunities. We find evidence of racial discrimination in Meta's algorithmic delivery of ads for education opportunities, posing legal and ethical concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-02T02:00:55Z)
• Discrimination through Image Selection by Job Advertisers on Facebook [79.21648699199648]
  We propose and investigate the prevalence of a new means for discrimination in job advertising. It combines both targeting and delivery -- through the disproportionate representation or exclusion of people of certain demographics in job ad images. We use the Facebook Ad Library to demonstrate the prevalence of this practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T03:43:58Z)
• Towards Fairness in Personalized Ads Using Impression Variance Aware Reinforcement Learning [9.246089899723744]
  Variance Reduction System (VRS) for achieving more equitable outcomes in Meta's ads systems. We first define metrics to quantify fairness gaps in terms of ad impression variances. We then present the VRS for re-ranking ads in an impression variance-aware manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-05T22:38:21Z)
• Lessons from the AdKDD'21 Privacy-Preserving ML Challenge [57.365745458033075]
  A prominent proposal at W3C only allows sharing advertising signals through aggregated, differentially private reports of past displays. To study this proposal extensively, an open Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning Challenge took place at AdKDD'21. A key finding is that learning models on large, aggregated data in the presence of a small set of unaggregated data points can be surprisingly efficient and cheap.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-31T11:09:59Z)
• Auditing for Discrimination in Algorithms Delivering Job Ads [70.02478301291264]
  We develop a new methodology for black-box auditing of algorithms for discrimination in the delivery of job advertisements. Our first contribution is to identify the distinction between skew in ad delivery due to protected categories such as gender or race. Second, we develop an auditing methodology that distinguishes between skew explainable by differences in qualifications from other factors. Third, we apply our proposed methodology to two prominent targeted advertising platforms for job ads: Facebook and LinkedIn.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-09T17:38:36Z)
• An Iterative Approach for Identifying Complaint Based Tweets in Social Media Platforms [76.9570531352697]
  We propose an iterative methodology which aims to identify complaint based posts pertaining to the transport domain. We perform comprehensive evaluations along with releasing a novel dataset for the research purposes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-24T22:23:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.