Boost Neural Networks by Checkpoints

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.00959v1
• Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2021 09:14:15 GMT
• Title: Boost Neural Networks by Checkpoints
• Authors: Feng Wang, Guoyizhe Wei, Qiao Liu, Jinxiang Ou, Xian Wei, Hairong Lv
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel method to ensemble the checkpoints of deep neural networks (DNNs) With the same training budget, our method achieves 4.16% lower error on Cifar-100 and 6.96% on Tiny-ImageNet with ResNet-110 architecture.
• Score: 9.411567653599358
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Training multiple deep neural networks (DNNs) and averaging their outputs is a simple way to improve the predictive performance. Nevertheless, the multiplied training cost prevents this ensemble method to be practical and efficient. Several recent works attempt to save and ensemble the checkpoints of DNNs, which only requires the same computational cost as training a single network. However, these methods suffer from either marginal accuracy improvements due to the low diversity of checkpoints or high risk of divergence due to the cyclical learning rates they adopted. In this paper, we propose a novel method to ensemble the checkpoints, where a boosting scheme is utilized to accelerate model convergence and maximize the checkpoint diversity. We theoretically prove that it converges by reducing exponential loss. The empirical evaluation also indicates our proposed ensemble outperforms single model and existing ensembles in terms of accuracy and efficiency. With the same training budget, our method achieves 4.16% lower error on Cifar-100 and 6.96% on Tiny-ImageNet with ResNet-110 architecture. Moreover, the adaptive sample weights in our method make it an effective solution to address the imbalanced class distribution. In the experiments, it yields up to 5.02% higher accuracy over single EfficientNet-B0 on the imbalanced datasets.

Related papers

• Just How Flexible are Neural Networks in Practice? [89.80474583606242]
  It is widely believed that a neural network can fit a training set containing at least as many samples as it has parameters. In practice, however, we only find solutions via our training procedure, including the gradient and regularizers, limiting flexibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T12:24:45Z)
• Grad-Instructor: Universal Backpropagation with Explainable Evaluation Neural Networks for Meta-learning and AutoML [0.0]
  An Evaluation Neural Network (ENN) is trained via deep reinforcement learning to predict the performance of the target network. The ENN then works as an additional evaluation function during backpropagation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-15T08:37:51Z)
• Two Heads are Better than One: Robust Learning Meets Multi-branch Models [14.72099568017039]
  We propose Branch Orthogonality adveRsarial Training (BORT) to obtain state-of-the-art performance with solely the original dataset for adversarial training. We evaluate our approach on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and SVHN against ell_infty norm-bounded perturbations of size epsilon = 8/255, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-17T05:42:59Z)
• TCT: Convexifying Federated Learning using Bootstrapped Neural Tangent Kernels [141.29156234353133]
  State-of-the-art convex learning methods can perform far worse than their centralized counterparts when clients have dissimilar data distributions. We show this disparity can largely be attributed to challenges presented by non-NISTity. We propose a Train-Convexify neural network (TCT) procedure to sidestep this issue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-13T16:58:22Z)
• Effective Model Sparsification by Scheduled Grow-and-Prune Methods [73.03533268740605]
  We propose a novel scheduled grow-and-prune (GaP) methodology without pre-training the dense models. Experiments have shown that such models can match or beat the quality of highly optimized dense models at 80% sparsity on a variety of tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-18T01:03:13Z)
• Learning Neural Network Subspaces [74.44457651546728]
  Recent observations have advanced our understanding of the neural network optimization landscape. With a similar computational cost as training one model, we learn lines, curves, and simplexes of high-accuracy neural networks. With a similar computational cost as training one model, we learn lines, curves, and simplexes of high-accuracy neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-20T23:26:58Z)
• S2-BNN: Bridging the Gap Between Self-Supervised Real and 1-bit Neural Networks via Guided Distribution Calibration [74.5509794733707]
  We present a novel guided learning paradigm from real-valued to distill binary networks on the final prediction distribution. Our proposed method can boost the simple contrastive learning baseline by an absolute gain of 5.515% on BNNs. Our method achieves substantial improvement over the simple contrastive learning baseline, and is even comparable to many mainstream supervised BNN methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T18:59:28Z)
• Training Sparse Neural Networks using Compressed Sensing [13.84396596420605]
  We develop and test a novel method based on compressed sensing which combines the pruning and training into a single step. Specifically, we utilize an adaptively weighted $ell1$ penalty on the weights during training, which we combine with a generalization of the regularized dual averaging (RDA) algorithm in order to train sparse neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-21T19:35:54Z)
• Passive Batch Injection Training Technique: Boosting Network Performance by Injecting Mini-Batches from a different Data Distribution [39.8046809855363]
  This work presents a novel training technique for deep neural networks that makes use of additional data from a distribution that is different from that of the original input data. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that makes use of different data distribution to aid the training of convolutional neural networks (CNNs)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-08T08:17:32Z)
• Efficient and Scalable Bayesian Neural Nets with Rank-1 Factors [36.56528603807598]
  We propose a rank-1 parameterization of BNNs, where each weight matrix involves only a distribution on a rank-1 subspace. We also revisit the use of mixture approximate posteriors to capture multiple modes, where unlike typical mixtures, this approach admits a significantly smaller memory increase. For ResNet-50 on ImageNet, Wide ResNet 28-10 on CIFAR-10/100, and an RNN on MIMIC-III, rank-1 BNNs achieve state-of-the-art performance across log-likelihood, accuracy, and calibration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-14T17:58:59Z)
• Fitting the Search Space of Weight-sharing NAS with Graph Convolutional Networks [100.14670789581811]
  We train a graph convolutional network to fit the performance of sampled sub-networks. With this strategy, we achieve a higher rank correlation coefficient in the selected set of candidates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-17T19:12:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.