Estimating Potential Outcome Distributions with Collaborating Causal Networks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.01664v1
• Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2021 19:02:24 GMT
• Title: Estimating Potential Outcome Distributions with Collaborating Causal Networks
• Authors: Tianhui Zhou, David Carlson
• Abstract summary: Many causal inference approaches have focused on identifying an individual's outcome change due to a potential treatment. We propose Collaborating Causal Networks (CCN) to estimate the full potential outcome distributions.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Many causal inference approaches have focused on identifying an individual's outcome change due to a potential treatment, or the individual treatment effect (ITE), from observational studies. Rather than only estimating the ITE, we propose Collaborating Causal Networks (CCN) to estimate the full potential outcome distributions. This modification facilitates estimating the utility of each treatment and allows for individual variation in utility functions (e.g., variability in risk tolerance). We show that CCN learns distributions that asymptotically capture the correct potential outcome distributions under standard causal inference assumptions. Furthermore, we develop a new adjustment approach that is empirically effective in alleviating sample imbalance between treatment groups in observational studies. We evaluate CCN by extensive empirical experiments and demonstrate improved distribution estimates compared to existing Bayesian and Generative Adversarial Network-based methods. Additionally, CCN empirically improves decisions over a variety of utility functions.

Related papers

• Practical Improvements of A/B Testing with Off-Policy Estimation [51.25970890274447]
  We introduce a family of unbiased off-policy estimators that achieves lower variance than the standard approach.<n>Our theoretical analysis and experimental results validate the effectiveness and practicality of the proposed method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-12T13:11:01Z)
• A Semiparametric Approach to Causal Inference [2.092897805817524]
  In causal inference, an important problem is to quantify the effects of interventions or treatments. In this paper, we employ a semiparametric density ratio model (DRM) to characterize the counterfactual distributions. Our model offers flexibility by avoiding strict parametric assumptions on the counterfactual distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-01T18:03:38Z)
• Conformal Diffusion Models for Individual Treatment Effect Estimation and Inference [6.406853903837333]
  Individual treatment effect offers the most granular measure of treatment effect on an individual level. We propose a novel conformal diffusion model-based approach that addresses those intricate challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T21:35:08Z)
• Conformal Convolution and Monte Carlo Meta-learners for Predictive Inference of Individual Treatment Effects [2.7320409129940684]
  We propose two novel methods to generate full predictive distributions of potential outcomes and individual treatment effects (ITEs)<n>Our approaches combine weighted conformal predictive systems with either analytic convolution of potential outcome distributions or Monte Carlo sampling.<n>In contrast to other approaches that allow the generation of potential outcome predictive distributions, our approaches are model agnostic, universal, and come with finite-sample guarantees of probabilistic calibration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T14:35:25Z)
• Understanding Contrastive Learning via Distributionally Robust Optimization [29.202594242468678]
  This study reveals the inherent tolerance of contrastive learning (CL) towards sampling bias, wherein negative samples may encompass similar semantics (eg labels) We bridge this research gap by analyzing CL through the lens of distributionally robust optimization (DRO), yielding several key insights. We also identify CL's potential shortcomings, including over-conservatism and sensitivity to outliers, and introduce a novel Adjusted InfoNCE loss (ADNCE) to mitigate these issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T07:32:59Z)
• Benchmarking Bayesian Causal Discovery Methods for Downstream Treatment Effect Estimation [137.3520153445413]
  A notable gap exists in the evaluation of causal discovery methods, where insufficient emphasis is placed on downstream inference. We evaluate seven established baseline causal discovery methods including a newly proposed method based on GFlowNets. The results of our study demonstrate that some of the algorithms studied are able to effectively capture a wide range of useful and diverse ATE modes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-11T02:58:10Z)
• Improved Policy Evaluation for Randomized Trials of Algorithmic Resource Allocation [54.72195809248172]
  We present a new estimator leveraging our proposed novel concept, that involves retrospective reshuffling of participants across experimental arms at the end of an RCT. We prove theoretically that such an estimator is more accurate than common estimators based on sample means.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T05:17:22Z)
• DESCN: Deep Entire Space Cross Networks for Individual Treatment Effect Estimation [7.060064266376701]
  Causal Inference has wide applications in various areas such as E-commerce and precision medicine. This paper proposes Deep Entire Space Cross Networks (DESCN) to model treatment effects from an end-to-end perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-19T01:25:31Z)
• Excess risk analysis for epistemic uncertainty with application to variational inference [110.4676591819618]
  We present a novel EU analysis in the frequentist setting, where data is generated from an unknown distribution. We show a relation between the generalization ability and the widely used EU measurements, such as the variance and entropy of the predictive distribution. We propose new variational inference that directly controls the prediction and EU evaluation performances based on the PAC-Bayesian theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-02T12:12:24Z)
• On Inductive Biases for Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimation [91.3755431537592]
  We investigate how to exploit structural similarities of an individual's potential outcomes (POs) under different treatments. We compare three end-to-end learning strategies to overcome this problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T16:30:46Z)
• Balance Regularized Neural Network Models for Causal Effect Estimation [16.8658322310041]
  We advocate balance regularization of multi-head neural network architectures. We further regularize the model by encouraging it to predict control outcomes for individuals in the treatment group that are similar to control outcomes in the control group.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-23T04:03:55Z)
• Estimating the Effects of Continuous-valued Interventions using Generative Adversarial Networks [103.14809802212535]
  We build on the generative adversarial networks (GANs) framework to address the problem of estimating the effect of continuous-valued interventions. Our model, SCIGAN, is flexible and capable of simultaneously estimating counterfactual outcomes for several different continuous interventions. To address the challenges presented by shifting to continuous interventions, we propose a novel architecture for our discriminator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-27T18:46:21Z)
• Generalization Bounds and Representation Learning for Estimation of Potential Outcomes and Causal Effects [61.03579766573421]
  We study estimation of individual-level causal effects, such as a single patient's response to alternative medication. We devise representation learning algorithms that minimize our bound, by regularizing the representation's induced treatment group distance. We extend these algorithms to simultaneously learn a weighted representation to further reduce treatment group distances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-21T10:16:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.