Probabilistic Metamodels for an Efficient Characterization of Complex Driving Scenarios

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.02892v2
• Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 13:01:34 GMT
• Title: Probabilistic Metamodels for an Efficient Characterization of Complex Driving Scenarios
• Authors: Max Winkelmann, Mike Kohlhoff, Hadj Hamma Tadjine, Steffen M\"uller
• Abstract summary: We introduce and evaluate an iterative approach to efficiently select test cases. Our results show that regarding predictive performance, the appropriate selection of test cases is more important than the choice of metamodels. This implies that relevant test cases have to be explored using scalable virtual environments and flexible models.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: To systematically validate the safe behavior of automated vehicles (AV), the aim of scenario-based testing is to cluster the infinite situations an AV might encounter into a finite set of functional scenarios. Every functional scenario, however, can still manifest itself in a vast amount of variations. Thus, metamodels are often used to perform analyses or to select specific variations for examination. However, despite the safety criticalness of AV testing, metamodels are usually seen as a part of an overall approach, and their predictions are not further examined. In this paper, we analyze the predictive performance of Gaussian processes (GP), deep Gaussian processes, extra-trees (ET), and Bayesian neural networks (BNN), considering four scenarios with 5 to 20 inputs. Building on this, we introduce and evaluate an iterative approach to efficiently select test cases. Our results show that regarding predictive performance, the appropriate selection of test cases is more important than the choice of metamodels. While their great flexibility allows BNNs to benefit from large amounts of data and to model even the most complex scenarios, less flexible models like GPs can convince with higher reliability. This implies that relevant test cases have to be explored using scalable virtual environments and flexible models so that more realistic test environments and more trustworthy models can be used for targeted testing and validation.

Related papers

• Zero-shot Model Diagnosis [80.36063332820568]
  A common approach to evaluate deep learning models is to build a labeled test set with attributes of interest and assess how well it performs. This paper argues the case that Zero-shot Model Diagnosis (ZOOM) is possible without the need for a test set nor labeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-27T17:59:33Z)
• HyperImpute: Generalized Iterative Imputation with Automatic Model Selection [77.86861638371926]
  We propose a generalized iterative imputation framework for adaptively and automatically configuring column-wise models. We provide a concrete implementation with out-of-the-box learners, simulators, and interfaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-15T19:10:35Z)
• Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgetting [60.36499845014649]
  Test-time adaptation seeks to tackle potential distribution shifts between training and testing data. We propose an active sample selection criterion to identify reliable and non-redundant samples. We also introduce a Fisher regularizer to constrain important model parameters from drastic changes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-06T06:39:40Z)
• Parameter-free Online Test-time Adaptation [19.279048049267388]
  We show how test-time adaptation methods fare for a number of pre-trained models on a variety of real-world scenarios. We propose a particularly "conservative" approach, which addresses the problem with a Laplacian Adjusted Maximum Estimation (LAME) Our approach exhibits a much higher average accuracy across scenarios than existing methods, while being notably faster and have a much lower memory footprint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-15T00:29:16Z)
• MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentation [131.28104376280197]
  We study the problem of test time robustification, i.e., using the test input to improve model robustness. Recent prior works have proposed methods for test time adaptation, however, they each introduce additional assumptions. We propose a simple approach that can be used in any test setting where the model is probabilistic and adaptable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-18T17:55:11Z)
• Approximate Bayesian Optimisation for Neural Networks [6.921210544516486]
  A body of work has been done to automate machine learning algorithm to highlight the importance of model choice. The necessity to solve the analytical tractability and the computational feasibility in a idealistic fashion enables to ensure the efficiency and the applicability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-27T19:03:32Z)
• ALT-MAS: A Data-Efficient Framework for Active Testing of Machine Learning Algorithms [58.684954492439424]
  We propose a novel framework to efficiently test a machine learning model using only a small amount of labeled test data. The idea is to estimate the metrics of interest for a model-under-test using Bayesian neural network (BNN)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-11T12:14:04Z)
• Characterizing Fairness Over the Set of Good Models Under Selective Labels [69.64662540443162]
  We develop a framework for characterizing predictive fairness properties over the set of models that deliver similar overall performance. We provide tractable algorithms to compute the range of attainable group-level predictive disparities. We extend our framework to address the empirically relevant challenge of selectively labelled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-02T02:11:37Z)
• A Worrying Analysis of Probabilistic Time-series Models for Sales Forecasting [10.690379201437015]
  Probabilistic time-series models become popular in the forecasting field as they help to make optimal decisions under uncertainty. We analyze the performance of three prominent probabilistic time-series models for sales forecasting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-21T03:31:23Z)
• Efficient statistical validation with edge cases to evaluate Highly Automated Vehicles [6.198523595657983]
  The widescale deployment of Autonomous Vehicles seems to be imminent despite many safety challenges that are yet to be resolved. Existing standards focus on deterministic processes where the validation requires only a set of test cases that cover the requirements. This paper presents a new approach to compute the statistical characteristics of a system's behaviour by biasing automatically generated test cases towards the worst case scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-04T04:35:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.