Evaluating Predictive Distributions: Does Bayesian Deep Learning Work?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.04629v1
• Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2021 18:54:02 GMT
• Title: Evaluating Predictive Distributions: Does Bayesian Deep Learning Work?
• Authors: Ian Osband, Zheng Wen, Seyed Mohammad Asghari, Vikranth Dwaracherla, Botao Hao, Morteza Ibrahimi, Dieterich Lawson, Xiuyuan Lu, Brendan O'Donoghue, Benjamin Van Roy
• Abstract summary: Posterior predictive distributions quantify uncertainties ignored by point estimates. This paper introduces textitThe Neural Testbed, which provides tools for the systematic evaluation of agents that generate such predictions.
• Score: 45.290773422944866
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Posterior predictive distributions quantify uncertainties ignored by point estimates. This paper introduces \textit{The Neural Testbed}, which provides tools for the systematic evaluation of agents that generate such predictions. Crucially, these tools assess not only the quality of marginal predictions per input, but also joint predictions given many inputs. Joint distributions are often critical for useful uncertainty quantification, but they have been largely overlooked by the Bayesian deep learning community. We benchmark several approaches to uncertainty estimation using a neural-network-based data generating process. Our results reveal the importance of evaluation beyond marginal predictions. Further, they reconcile sources of confusion in the field, such as why Bayesian deep learning approaches that generate accurate marginal predictions perform poorly in sequential decision tasks, how incorporating priors can be helpful, and what roles epistemic versus aleatoric uncertainty play when evaluating performance. We also present experiments on real-world challenge datasets, which show a high correlation with testbed results, and that the importance of evaluating joint predictive distributions carries over to real data. As part of this effort, we opensource The Neural Testbed, including all implementations from this paper.

Related papers

• Tractable Function-Space Variational Inference in Bayesian Neural Networks [72.97620734290139]
  A popular approach for estimating the predictive uncertainty of neural networks is to define a prior distribution over the network parameters. We propose a scalable function-space variational inference method that allows incorporating prior information. We show that the proposed method leads to state-of-the-art uncertainty estimation and predictive performance on a range of prediction tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-28T18:33:26Z)
• Quantification of Predictive Uncertainty via Inference-Time Sampling [57.749601811982096]
  We propose a post-hoc sampling strategy for estimating predictive uncertainty accounting for data ambiguity. The method can generate different plausible outputs for a given input and does not assume parametric forms of predictive distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-03T12:43:21Z)
• Toward Robust Uncertainty Estimation with Random Activation Functions [3.0586855806896045]
  We propose a novel approach for uncertainty quantification via ensembles, called Random Activation Functions (RAFs) Ensemble. RAFs Ensemble outperforms state-of-the-art ensemble uncertainty quantification methods on both synthetic and real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-28T13:17:56Z)
• Fast Uncertainty Estimates in Deep Learning Interatomic Potentials [0.0]
  We propose a method to estimate the predictive uncertainty based on a single neural network without the need for an ensemble. We demonstrate that the quality of the uncertainty estimates matches those obtained from deep ensembles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-17T20:13:39Z)
• Evaluating High-Order Predictive Distributions in Deep Learning [27.076321280462057]
  Joint predictive distributions are essential for good performance in decision problems. We introduce textitdyadic sampling, which focuses on predictive distributions associated with random textitpairs of inputs. We demonstrate that this approach efficiently distinguishes agents in high-dimensional examples involving simple logistic regression as well as complex synthetic and empirical data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-28T02:10:00Z)
• Dense Uncertainty Estimation [62.23555922631451]
  In this paper, we investigate neural networks and uncertainty estimation techniques to achieve both accurate deterministic prediction and reliable uncertainty estimation. We work on two types of uncertainty estimations solutions, namely ensemble based methods and generative model based methods, and explain their pros and cons while using them in fully/semi/weakly-supervised framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T01:23:48Z)
• Improving Uncertainty Calibration via Prior Augmented Data [56.88185136509654]
  Neural networks have proven successful at learning from complex data distributions by acting as universal function approximators. They are often overconfident in their predictions, which leads to inaccurate and miscalibrated probabilistic predictions. We propose a solution by seeking out regions of feature space where the model is unjustifiably overconfident, and conditionally raising the entropy of those predictions towards that of the prior distribution of the labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-22T07:02:37Z)
• Probabilistic Deep Learning for Instance Segmentation [9.62543698736491]
  We propose a generic method to obtain model-inherent uncertainty estimates within proposal-free instance segmentation models. We evaluate our method on the BBBC010 C. elegans dataset, where it yields competitive performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-24T19:51:48Z)
• Robust Validation: Confident Predictions Even When Distributions Shift [19.327409270934474]
  We describe procedures for robust predictive inference, where a model provides uncertainty estimates on its predictions rather than point predictions. We present a method that produces prediction sets (almost exactly) giving the right coverage level for any test distribution in an $f$-divergence ball around the training population. An essential component of our methodology is to estimate the amount of expected future data shift and build robustness to it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-10T17:09:16Z)
• Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
  We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation. We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.