Dense Uncertainty Estimation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.06427v1
• Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 01:23:48 GMT
• Title: Dense Uncertainty Estimation
• Authors: Jing Zhang, Yuchao Dai, Mochu Xiang, Deng-Ping Fan, Peyman Moghadam, Mingyi He, Christian Walder, Kaihao Zhang, Mehrtash Harandi, Nick Barnes
• Abstract summary: In this paper, we investigate neural networks and uncertainty estimation techniques to achieve both accurate deterministic prediction and reliable uncertainty estimation. We work on two types of uncertainty estimations solutions, namely ensemble based methods and generative model based methods, and explain their pros and cons while using them in fully/semi/weakly-supervised framework.
• Score: 62.23555922631451
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Deep neural networks can be roughly divided into deterministic neural networks and stochastic neural networks.The former is usually trained to achieve a mapping from input space to output space via maximum likelihood estimation for the weights, which leads to deterministic predictions during testing. In this way, a specific weights set is estimated while ignoring any uncertainty that may occur in the proper weight space. The latter introduces randomness into the framework, either by assuming a prior distribution over model parameters (i.e. Bayesian Neural Networks) or including latent variables (i.e. generative models) to explore the contribution of latent variables for model predictions, leading to stochastic predictions during testing. Different from the former that achieves point estimation, the latter aims to estimate the prediction distribution, making it possible to estimate uncertainty, representing model ignorance about its predictions. We claim that conventional deterministic neural network based dense prediction tasks are prone to overfitting, leading to over-confident predictions, which is undesirable for decision making. In this paper, we investigate stochastic neural networks and uncertainty estimation techniques to achieve both accurate deterministic prediction and reliable uncertainty estimation. Specifically, we work on two types of uncertainty estimations solutions, namely ensemble based methods and generative model based methods, and explain their pros and cons while using them in fully/semi/weakly-supervised framework. Due to the close connection between uncertainty estimation and model calibration, we also introduce how uncertainty estimation can be used for deep model calibration to achieve well-calibrated models, namely dense model calibration. Code and data are available at https://github.com/JingZhang617/UncertaintyEstimation.

Related papers

• Efficient Normalized Conformal Prediction and Uncertainty Quantification for Anti-Cancer Drug Sensitivity Prediction with Deep Regression Forests [0.0]
  Conformal Prediction has emerged as a promising method to pair machine learning models with prediction intervals. We propose a method to estimate the uncertainty of each sample by calculating the variance obtained from a Deep Regression Forest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T19:09:53Z)
• Quantification of Predictive Uncertainty via Inference-Time Sampling [57.749601811982096]
  We propose a post-hoc sampling strategy for estimating predictive uncertainty accounting for data ambiguity. The method can generate different plausible outputs for a given input and does not assume parametric forms of predictive distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-03T12:43:21Z)
• Quantifying Deep Learning Model Uncertainty in Conformal Prediction [1.4685355149711297]
  Conformal Prediction is a promising framework for representing the model uncertainty. In this paper, we explore state-of-the-art CP methodologies and their theoretical foundations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T16:37:50Z)
• Looking at the posterior: accuracy and uncertainty of neural-network predictions [0.0]
  We show that prediction accuracy depends on both epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty. We introduce a novel acquisition function that outperforms common uncertainty-based methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-26T16:13:32Z)
• Confidence estimation of classification based on the distribution of the neural network output layer [4.529188601556233]
  One of the most common problems preventing the application of prediction models in the real world is lack of generalization. We propose novel methods that estimate uncertainty of particular predictions generated by a neural network classification model. The proposed methods infer the confidence of a particular prediction based on the distribution of the logit values corresponding to this prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T12:32:50Z)
• Uncertainty estimation of pedestrian future trajectory using Bayesian approximation [137.00426219455116]
  Under dynamic traffic scenarios, planning based on deterministic predictions is not trustworthy. The authors propose to quantify uncertainty during forecasting using approximation which deterministic approaches fail to capture. The effect of dropout weights and long-term prediction on future state uncertainty has been studied.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-04T04:23:38Z)
• NUQ: Nonparametric Uncertainty Quantification for Deterministic Neural Networks [151.03112356092575]
  We show the principled way to measure the uncertainty of predictions for a classifier based on Nadaraya-Watson's nonparametric estimate of the conditional label distribution. We demonstrate the strong performance of the method in uncertainty estimation tasks on a variety of real-world image datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-07T12:30:45Z)
• Dense Uncertainty Estimation via an Ensemble-based Conditional Latent Variable Model [68.34559610536614]
  We argue that the aleatoric uncertainty is an inherent attribute of the data and can only be correctly estimated with an unbiased oracle model. We propose a new sampling and selection strategy at train time to approximate the oracle model for aleatoric uncertainty estimation. Our results show that our solution achieves both accurate deterministic results and reliable uncertainty estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-22T08:54:10Z)
• When in Doubt: Neural Non-Parametric Uncertainty Quantification for Epidemic Forecasting [70.54920804222031]
  Most existing forecasting models disregard uncertainty quantification, resulting in mis-calibrated predictions. Recent works in deep neural models for uncertainty-aware time-series forecasting also have several limitations. We model the forecasting task as a probabilistic generative process and propose a functional neural process model called EPIFNP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T18:31:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.