Ride Sharing & Data Privacy: An Analysis of the State of Practice
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.09188v2
- Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 10:16:03 GMT
- Title: Ride Sharing & Data Privacy: An Analysis of the State of Practice
- Authors: Carsten Hesselmann, Jan Gertheiss, J\"org P. M\"uller
- Abstract summary: We analyzed how popular ride sharing services handle user privacy to assess the current state of practice.
The results show that services include a varying set of personal data and offer limited privacy-related features.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Digital services like ride sharing rely heavily on personal data as
individuals have to disclose personal information in order to gain access to
the market and exchange their information with other participants; yet, the
service provider usually gives little to no information regarding the privacy
status of the disclosed information though privacy concerns are a decisive
factor for individuals to (not) use these services. We analyzed how popular
ride sharing services handle user privacy to assess the current state of
practice. The results show that services include a varying set of personal data
and offer limited privacy-related features.
Related papers
- Collection, usage and privacy of mobility data in the enterprise and public administrations [55.2480439325792]
Security measures such as anonymization are needed to protect individuals' privacy.
Within our study, we conducted expert interviews to gain insights into practices in the field.
We survey privacy-enhancing methods in use, which generally do not comply with state-of-the-art standards of differential privacy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-04T08:29:27Z) - Towards a decentralized data privacy protocol for self-sovereignty in the digital world [0.0]
We propose a paradigm shift towards an enriched user-centric approach for cross-service privacy preferences management.
In this vision paper, we propose the realization of a decentralized data privacy protocol.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-19T12:19:04Z) - Visualising Personal Data Flows: Insights from a Case Study of Booking.com [8.485751288361616]
This paper reports our work on taking Booking.com as a case study to visualise personal data flows extracted from their privacy policy.
By showcasing how the company shares its consumers' personal data, we raise questions and extend discussions on the challenges and limitations of using privacy policies to inform online users about the true scale and the landscape of personal data flows.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-19T12:17:46Z) - Protecting User Privacy in Online Settings via Supervised Learning [69.38374877559423]
We design an intelligent approach to online privacy protection that leverages supervised learning.
By detecting and blocking data collection that might infringe on a user's privacy, we can restore a degree of digital privacy to the user.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-06T05:20:16Z) - Position: Considerations for Differentially Private Learning with Large-Scale Public Pretraining [75.25943383604266]
We question whether the use of large Web-scraped datasets should be viewed as differential-privacy-preserving.
We caution that publicizing these models pretrained on Web data as "private" could lead to harm and erode the public's trust in differential privacy as a meaningful definition of privacy.
We conclude by discussing potential paths forward for the field of private learning, as public pretraining becomes more popular and powerful.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-13T10:41:12Z) - How Do Input Attributes Impact the Privacy Loss in Differential Privacy? [55.492422758737575]
We study the connection between the per-subject norm in DP neural networks and individual privacy loss.
We introduce a novel metric termed the Privacy Loss-Input Susceptibility (PLIS) which allows one to apportion the subject's privacy loss to their input attributes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-18T11:39:03Z) - Privacy Explanations - A Means to End-User Trust [64.7066037969487]
We looked into how explainability might help to tackle this problem.
We created privacy explanations that aim to help to clarify to end users why and for what purposes specific data is required.
Our findings reveal that privacy explanations can be an important step towards increasing trust in software systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-18T09:30:37Z) - "I need a better description'': An Investigation Into User Expectations
For Differential Privacy [31.352325485393074]
We explore users' privacy expectations related to differential privacy.
We find that users care about the kinds of information leaks against which differential privacy protects.
We find that the ways in which differential privacy is described in-the-wild haphazardly set users' privacy expectations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-13T02:36:37Z) - Personal Data Gentrification [5.127089848246933]
We live in an era in which the most valued services are not paid for in money, but in personal data.
We propose Personal Data Enfranchisement as a middle ground, empowering individuals to control the sharing of their personal information.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-31T14:26:05Z) - Applications of Differential Privacy in Social Network Analysis: A
Survey [60.696428840516724]
Differential privacy is effective in sharing information and preserving privacy with a strong guarantee.
Social network analysis has been extensively adopted in many applications, opening a new arena for the application of differential privacy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-06T19:06:03Z) - Utility-aware Privacy-preserving Data Releasing [7.462336024223669]
We propose a two-step perturbation-based privacy-preserving data releasing framework.
First, certain predefined privacy and utility problems are learned from the public domain data.
We then leverage the learned knowledge to precisely perturb the data owners' data into privatized data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-09T05:32:46Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.