Interpretable Machine Learning for Resource Allocation with Application to Ventilator Triage

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.10994v2
• Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 16:57:36 GMT
• Title: Interpretable Machine Learning for Resource Allocation with Application to Ventilator Triage
• Abstract summary: Well-defined guidelines to triage scarce life-saving resources must be designed to promote transparency, trust, and consistency. We propose a novel data-driven model to compute interpretable triage guidelines based on policies for Markov Decision Process. Our empirical study shows that the number of excess deaths associated with ventilator shortages could be reduced significantly using our policy.
• Score: 6.751130449661001
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Rationing of healthcare resources is a challenging decision that policy makers and providers may be forced to make during a pandemic, natural disaster, or mass casualty event. Well-defined guidelines to triage scarce life-saving resources must be designed to promote transparency, trust, and consistency. To facilitate buy-in and use during high-stress situations, these guidelines need to be interpretable and operational. We propose a novel data-driven model to compute interpretable triage guidelines based on policies for Markov Decision Process that can be represented as simple sequences of decision trees ("tree policies"). In particular, we characterize the properties of optimal tree policies and present an algorithm based on dynamic programming recursions to compute good tree policies. We utilize this methodology to obtain simple, novel triage guidelines for ventilator allocations for COVID-19 patients, based on real patient data from Montefiore hospitals. We also compare the performance of our guidelines to the official New York State guidelines that were developed in 2015 (well before the COVID-19 pandemic). Our empirical study shows that the number of excess deaths associated with ventilator shortages could be reduced significantly using our policy. Our work highlights the limitations of the existing official triage guidelines, which need to be adapted specifically to COVID-19 before being successfully deployed.

Related papers

• Strategic Feature Selection [62.74494413516484]
  We study strategic classification through feature selection and its interaction with ridge regularization.<n>We provide a fine-grained characterization of the performance of a feature subset under optimal regularization.<n>Motivated by this characterization, we develop a practical algorithm for jointly choosing the feature set and the level of ridge regularization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-17T09:47:15Z)
• Learning Policy Representations for Steerable Behavior Synthesis [80.4542176039074]
  Given a Markov decision process (MDP), we seek to learn representations for a range of policies to facilitate behavior steering at test time.<n>We show that these representations can be approximated uniformly for a range of policies using a set-based architecture.<n>We use variational generative approach to induce a smooth latent space, and further shape it with contrastive learning so that latent distances align with differences in value functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T21:52:06Z)
• Pragmatic Policy Development via Interpretable Behavior Cloning [6.177449809243359]
  We propose deriving treatment policies from the most frequently chosen actions in each patient state, as estimated by an interpretable model of the behavior policy.<n>We demonstrate that policies derived under this framework can outperform current practice, offering interpretable alternatives to those obtained via offline RL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-22T22:34:35Z)
• Leveraging graph neural networks for supporting Automatic Triage of Patients [5.864579168378686]
  We propose an AI based module to manage patients emergency code assignments in emergency departments. Data containing relevant patient information, such as vital signs, symptoms, and medical history, are used to accurately classify patients into triage categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T09:54:35Z)
• Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback: Learning Dynamic Choices via Pessimism [91.52263068880484]
  We study offline Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF) We aim to learn the human's underlying reward and the MDP's optimal policy from a set of trajectories induced by human choices. RLHF is challenging for multiple reasons: large state space but limited human feedback, the bounded rationality of human decisions, and the off-policy distribution shift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-29T01:18:39Z)
• Policy Optimization for Personalized Interventions in Behavioral Health [8.10897203067601]
  Behavioral health interventions, delivered through digital platforms, have the potential to significantly improve health outcomes. We study the problem of optimizing personalized interventions for patients to maximize a long-term outcome. We present a new approach for this problem that we dub DecompPI, which decomposes the state space for a system of patients to the individual level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-21T21:42:03Z)
• Improved Policy Evaluation for Randomized Trials of Algorithmic Resource Allocation [54.72195809248172]
  We present a new estimator leveraging our proposed novel concept, that involves retrospective reshuffling of participants across experimental arms at the end of an RCT. We prove theoretically that such an estimator is more accurate than common estimators based on sample means.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T05:17:22Z)
• Relative Sparsity for Medical Decision Problems [0.0]
  It is often important to explain to the healthcare provider, and to the patient, how a new policy differs from the current standard of care. We propose a criterion for selecting $lambda$, perform simulations, and illustrate our method with a real, observational healthcare dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-29T20:00:11Z)
• Offline Reinforcement Learning with Closed-Form Policy Improvement Operators [88.54210578912554]
  Behavior constrained policy optimization has been demonstrated to be a successful paradigm for tackling Offline Reinforcement Learning. In this paper, we propose our closed-form policy improvement operators. We empirically demonstrate their effectiveness over state-of-the-art algorithms on the standard D4RL benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-29T06:29:26Z)
• Policy Learning with Asymmetric Counterfactual Utilities [0.6138671548064356]
  We consider optimal policy learning with asymmetric counterfactual utility functions. We derive minimax decision rules by minimizing the maximum expected utility loss. We show that one can learn minimax loss decision rules from observed data by solving intermediate classification problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-21T15:44:49Z)
• Model Selection for Offline Reinforcement Learning: Practical Considerations for Healthcare Settings [13.376364233897528]
  Reinforcement learning can be used to learn treatment policies and aid decision making in healthcare. A standard validation pipeline for model selection requires running a learned policy in the actual environment. Our work serves as a practical guide for offline RL model selection and can help RL practitioners select policies using real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-23T02:41:51Z)
• Post-Contextual-Bandit Inference [57.88785630755165]
  Contextual bandit algorithms are increasingly replacing non-adaptive A/B tests in e-commerce, healthcare, and policymaking. They can both improve outcomes for study participants and increase the chance of identifying good or even best policies. To support credible inference on novel interventions at the end of the study, we still want to construct valid confidence intervals on average treatment effects, subgroup effects, or value of new policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-01T12:01:51Z)
• Privacy-Constrained Policies via Mutual Information Regularized Policy Gradients [54.98496284653234]
  We consider the task of training a policy that maximizes reward while minimizing disclosure of certain sensitive state variables through the actions. We solve this problem by introducing a regularizer based on the mutual information between the sensitive state and the actions. We develop a model-based estimator for optimization of privacy-constrained policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-30T03:22:35Z)
• Policy Gradient for Continuing Tasks in Non-stationary Markov Decision Processes [112.38662246621969]
  Reinforcement learning considers the problem of finding policies that maximize an expected cumulative reward in a Markov decision process with unknown transition probabilities. We compute unbiased navigation gradients of the value function which we use as ascent directions to update the policy. A major drawback of policy gradient-type algorithms is that they are limited to episodic tasks unless stationarity assumptions are imposed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-16T15:15:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.