Optimizing Information-theoretical Generalization Bounds via Anisotropic Noise in SGLD

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.13750v1
• Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 15:02:27 GMT
• Title: Optimizing Information-theoretical Generalization Bounds via Anisotropic Noise in SGLD
• Authors: Bohan Wang, Huishuai Zhang, Jieyu Zhang, Qi Meng, Wei Chen, Tie-Yan Liu
• Abstract summary: We optimize the information-theoretical generalization bound by manipulating the noise structure in SGLD. We prove that with constraint to guarantee low empirical risk, the optimal noise covariance is the square root of the expected gradient covariance.
• Score: 73.55632827932101
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recently, the information-theoretical framework has been proven to be able to obtain non-vacuous generalization bounds for large models trained by Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics (SGLD) with isotropic noise. In this paper, we optimize the information-theoretical generalization bound by manipulating the noise structure in SGLD. We prove that with constraint to guarantee low empirical risk, the optimal noise covariance is the square root of the expected gradient covariance if both the prior and the posterior are jointly optimized. This validates that the optimal noise is quite close to the empirical gradient covariance. Technically, we develop a new information-theoretical bound that enables such an optimization analysis. We then apply matrix analysis to derive the form of optimal noise covariance. Presented constraint and results are validated by the empirical observations.

Related papers

• Gradient Normalization with(out) Clipping Ensures Convergence of Nonconvex SGD under Heavy-Tailed Noise with Improved Results [60.92029979853314]
  This paper investigates Gradient Normalization without (NSGDC) its gradient reduction variant (NSGDC-VR) We present significant improvements in the theoretical results for both algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T22:40:42Z)
• The Optimal Noise in Noise-Contrastive Learning Is Not What You Think [80.07065346699005]
  We show that deviating from this assumption can actually lead to better statistical estimators. In particular, the optimal noise distribution is different from the data's and even from a different family.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-02T13:59:20Z)
• Heavy-tailed denoising score matching [5.371337604556311]
  We develop an iterative noise scaling algorithm to consistently initialise the multiple levels of noise in Langevin dynamics. On the practical side, our use of heavy-tailed DSM leads to improved score estimation, controllable sampling convergence, and more balanced unconditional generative performance for imbalanced datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-17T22:04:55Z)
• On the Double Descent of Random Features Models Trained with SGD [78.0918823643911]
  We study properties of random features (RF) regression in high dimensions optimized by gradient descent (SGD) We derive precise non-asymptotic error bounds of RF regression under both constant and adaptive step-size SGD setting. We observe the double descent phenomenon both theoretically and empirically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T17:47:39Z)
• High Probability Complexity Bounds for Non-Smooth Stochastic Optimization with Heavy-Tailed Noise [51.31435087414348]
  It is essential to theoretically guarantee that algorithms provide small objective residual with high probability. Existing methods for non-smooth convex optimization have complexity bounds with dependence on confidence level. We propose novel stepsize rules for two methods with gradient clipping.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-10T17:54:21Z)
• Noisy Gradient Descent Converges to Flat Minima for Nonconvex Matrix Factorization [36.182992409810446]
  This paper investigates the importance of noise in non optimization problems. We show that gradient descent can converge to any global form that converges to a global bias that is determined by the injected noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-24T17:50:17Z)
• Sample-Optimal PAC Learning of Halfspaces with Malicious Noise [4.8728183994912415]
  We study efficient PAC learning of halfspaces in $mathRd$ in the presence of malicious noise of Valiant(1985) We present a new analysis for the algorithm of Awasthi et al.( 2017) and show that it essentially achieves the near-optimal sample complexity bound of $tildeO(d)$. We extend the algorithm and analysis to the more general and stronger nasty noise model of Bbbshoutyetal (2002), showing that it is still possible to achieve near-optimal noise tolerance and sample complexity in time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-11T20:18:20Z)
• Beyond variance reduction: Understanding the true impact of baselines on policy optimization [24.09670734037029]
  We show that learning dynamics are governed by the curvature of the loss function and the noise of the gradient estimates. We present theoretical results showing that, at least for bandit problems, curvature and noise are not sufficient to explain the learning dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-31T17:52:09Z)
• Shape Matters: Understanding the Implicit Bias of the Noise Covariance [76.54300276636982]
  Noise in gradient descent provides a crucial implicit regularization effect for training over parameterized models. We show that parameter-dependent noise -- induced by mini-batches or label perturbation -- is far more effective than Gaussian noise. Our analysis reveals that parameter-dependent noise introduces a bias towards local minima with smaller noise variance, whereas spherical Gaussian noise does not.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T18:31:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.