Simple data balancing achieves competitive worst-group-accuracy

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.14503v1
• Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 15:15:11 GMT
• Title: Simple data balancing achieves competitive worst-group-accuracy
• Abstract summary: We compare state-of-the-art methods to simple balancing of classes and groups by either subsampling or reweighting data. Our results show that these data balancing baselines achieve state-of-the-art-accuracy. Access to group information is most critical for model selection purposes, and not so much during training.
• Score: 16.197105634385693
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We study the problem of learning classifiers that perform well across (known or unknown) groups of data. After observing that common worst-group-accuracy datasets suffer from substantial imbalances, we set out to compare state-of-the-art methods to simple balancing of classes and groups by either subsampling or reweighting data. Our results show that these data balancing baselines achieve state-of-the-art-accuracy, while being faster to train and requiring no additional hyper-parameters. In addition, we highlight that access to group information is most critical for model selection purposes, and not so much during training. All in all, our findings beg closer examination of benchmarks and methods for research in worst-group-accuracy optimization.

Related papers

• Beyond Synthetic Augmentation: Group-Aware Threshold Calibration for Robust Balanced Accuracy in Imbalanced Learning [0.0]
  Class imbalance remains a fundamental challenge in machine learning.<n>We show that group-aware threshold calibration offers a simpler, more interpretable, and more effective solution to class imbalance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-29T05:57:17Z)
• On the Interconnections of Calibration, Quantification, and Classifier Accuracy Prediction under Dataset Shift [58.91436551466064]
  This paper investigates the interconnections among three fundamental problems, calibration, and quantification, under dataset shift conditions.<n>We show that access to an oracle for any one of these tasks enables the resolution of the other two.<n>We propose new methods for each problem based on direct adaptations of well-established methods borrowed from the other disciplines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-16T15:42:55Z)
• Class-Conditional Distribution Balancing for Group Robust Classification [11.525201208566925]
  Spurious correlations that lead models to correct predictions for the wrong reasons pose a critical challenge for robust real-world generalization. We offer a novel perspective by reframing the spurious correlations as imbalances or mismatches in class-conditional distributions. We propose a simple yet effective robust learning method that eliminates the need for both bias annotations and predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-24T07:15:53Z)
• A CLIP-Powered Framework for Robust and Generalizable Data Selection [51.46695086779598]
  Real-world datasets often contain redundant and noisy data, imposing a negative impact on training efficiency and model performance. Data selection has shown promise in identifying the most representative samples from the entire dataset. We propose a novel CLIP-powered data selection framework that leverages multimodal information for more robust and generalizable sample selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T03:00:58Z)
• Efficient Bias Mitigation Without Privileged Information [14.21628601482357]
  Deep neural networks trained via empirical risk minimisation often exhibit significant performance disparities across groups. Existing bias mitigation methods that aim to address this issue often rely on group labels for training or validation. We propose Targeted Augmentations for Bias Mitigation (TAB), a framework that leverages the entire training history of a helper model to identify spurious samples. We show that TAB improves worst-group performance without any group information or model selection, outperforming existing methods while maintaining overall accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-26T09:56:13Z)
• The Group Robustness is in the Details: Revisiting Finetuning under Spurious Correlations [8.844894807922902]
  Modern machine learning models are prone to over-reliance on spurious correlations. In this paper, we identify surprising and nuanced behavior of finetuned models on worst-group accuracy. Our results show more nuanced interactions of modern finetuned models with group robustness than was previously known.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T00:34:03Z)
• Data Debiasing with Datamodels (D3M): Improving Subgroup Robustness via Data Selection [80.85902083005237]
  We introduce Data Debiasing with Datamodels (D3M), a debiasing approach which isolates and removes specific training examples that drive the model's failures on minority groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T17:51:01Z)
• Efficient Online Data Mixing For Language Model Pre-Training [101.45242332613944]
  Existing data selection methods suffer from slow and computationally expensive processes. Data mixing, on the other hand, reduces the complexity of data selection by grouping data points together. We develop an efficient algorithm for Online Data Mixing (ODM) that combines elements from both data selection and data mixing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-05T00:42:35Z)
• Bias Amplification Enhances Minority Group Performance [10.380812738348899]
  We propose BAM, a novel two-stage training algorithm. In the first stage, the model is trained using a bias amplification scheme via introducing a learnable auxiliary variable for each training sample. In the second stage, we upweight the samples that the bias-amplified model misclassifies, and then continue training the same model on the reweighted dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T04:40:08Z)
• Ranking & Reweighting Improves Group Distributional Robustness [14.021069321266516]
  We propose a ranking-based training method called Discounted Rank Upweighting (DRU) to learn models that exhibit strong OOD performance on the test data. Results on several synthetic and real-world datasets highlight the superior ability of our group-ranking-based (akin to soft-minimax) approach in selecting and learning models that are robust to group distributional shifts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-09T20:37:16Z)
• Simplicity Bias Leads to Amplified Performance Disparities [8.60453031364566]
  We show that SGD-trained models have a bias towards simplicity, leading them to prioritize learning a majority class. A model may prioritize any class or group of the dataset that it finds simple-at the expense of what it finds complex.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-13T15:24:41Z)
• Towards Group Robustness in the presence of Partial Group Labels [61.33713547766866]
  spurious correlations between input samples and the target labels wrongly direct the neural network predictions. We propose an algorithm that optimize for the worst-off group assignments from a constraint set. We show improvements in the minority group's performance while preserving overall aggregate accuracy across groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-10T22:04:48Z)
• Examining and Combating Spurious Features under Distribution Shift [94.31956965507085]
  We define and analyze robust and spurious representations using the information-theoretic concept of minimal sufficient statistics. We prove that even when there is only bias of the input distribution, models can still pick up spurious features from their training data. Inspired by our analysis, we demonstrate that group DRO can fail when groups do not directly account for various spurious correlations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T05:39:09Z)
• Long-Tailed Recognition Using Class-Balanced Experts [128.73438243408393]
  We propose an ensemble of class-balanced experts that combines the strength of diverse classifiers. Our ensemble of class-balanced experts reaches results close to state-of-the-art and an extended ensemble establishes a new state-of-the-art on two benchmarks for long-tailed recognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-07T20:57:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.