Deep Calibration of Interest Rates Model

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.15133v2
• Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 09:57:31 GMT
• Title: Deep Calibration of Interest Rates Model
• Authors: Mohamed Ben Alaya, Ahmed Kebaier, Djibril Sarr,
• Abstract summary: Despite the growing use of Deep Learning, classic rate models such as CIR and the Gaussian family are still widely used. In this paper, we propose to calibrate the five parameters of the G2++ model using Neural Networks.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: For any financial institution, it is essential to understand the behavior of interest rates. Despite the growing use of Deep Learning, for many reasons (expertise, ease of use, etc.), classic rate models such as CIR and the Gaussian family are still widely used. In this paper, we propose to calibrate the five parameters of the G2++ model using Neural Networks. Our first model is a Fully Connected Neural Network and is trained on covariances and correlations of Zero-Coupon and Forward rates. We show that covariances are more suited to the problem than correlations due to the effects of the unfeasible backpropagation phenomenon, which we analyze in this paper. The second model is a Convolutional Neural Network trained on Zero-Coupon rates with no further transformation. Our numerical tests show that our calibration based on deep learning outperforms the classic calibration method used as a benchmark. Additionally, our Deep Calibration approach is designed to be systematic. To illustrate this feature, we applied it to calibrate the popular CIR intensity model.

Related papers

• From Reactive to Proactive Volatility Modeling with Hemisphere Neural Networks [0.0]
  We reinvigorate maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) for macroeconomic density forecasting through a novel neural network architecture with dedicated mean and variance hemispheres. Our Hemisphere Neural Network (HNN) provides proactive volatility forecasts based on leading indicators when it can, and reactive volatility based on the magnitude of previous prediction errors when it must.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-27T21:37:50Z)
• Neural Clamping: Joint Input Perturbation and Temperature Scaling for Neural Network Calibration [62.4971588282174]
  We propose a new post-processing calibration method called Neural Clamping. Our empirical results show that Neural Clamping significantly outperforms state-of-the-art post-processing calibration methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-23T14:18:39Z)
• On the Dark Side of Calibration for Modern Neural Networks [65.83956184145477]
  We show the breakdown of expected calibration error (ECE) into predicted confidence and refinement. We highlight that regularisation based calibration only focuses on naively reducing a model's confidence. We find that many calibration approaches with the likes of label smoothing, mixup etc. lower the utility of a DNN by degrading its refinement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-17T11:04:14Z)
• Towards an Understanding of Benign Overfitting in Neural Networks [104.2956323934544]
  Modern machine learning models often employ a huge number of parameters and are typically optimized to have zero training loss. We examine how these benign overfitting phenomena occur in a two-layer neural network setting. We show that it is possible for the two-layer ReLU network interpolator to achieve a near minimax-optimal learning rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-06T19:08:53Z)
• Exploring the Uncertainty Properties of Neural Networks' Implicit Priors in the Infinite-Width Limit [47.324627920761685]
  We use recent theoretical advances that characterize the function-space prior to an ensemble of infinitely-wide NNs as a Gaussian process. This gives us a better understanding of the implicit prior NNs place on function space. We also examine the calibration of previous approaches to classification with the NNGP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-14T18:41:54Z)
• Post-hoc Calibration of Neural Networks by g-Layers [51.42640515410253]
  In recent years, there is a surge of research on neural network calibration. It is known that minimizing Negative Log-Likelihood (NLL) will lead to a calibrated network on the training set if the global optimum is attained. We prove that even though the base network ($f$) does not lead to the global optimum of NLL, by adding additional layers ($g$) and minimizing NLL by optimizing the parameters of $g$ one can obtain a calibrated network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-23T07:55:10Z)
• On Calibration of Mixup Training for Deep Neural Networks [1.6242924916178283]
  We argue and provide empirical evidence that, due to its fundamentals, Mixup does not necessarily improve calibration. Our loss is inspired by Bayes decision theory and introduces a new training framework for designing losses for probabilistic modelling. We provide state-of-the-art accuracy with consistent improvements in calibration performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-22T16:54:31Z)
• Calibrating Deep Neural Networks using Focal Loss [77.92765139898906]
  Miscalibration is a mismatch between a model's confidence and its correctness. We show that focal loss allows us to learn models that are already very well calibrated. We show that our approach achieves state-of-the-art calibration without compromising on accuracy in almost all cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-21T17:35:50Z)
• Kernel and Rich Regimes in Overparametrized Models [69.40899443842443]
  We show that gradient descent on overparametrized multilayer networks can induce rich implicit biases that are not RKHS norms. We also demonstrate this transition empirically for more complex matrix factorization models and multilayer non-linear networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-20T15:43:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.