Robust and Information-theoretically Safe Bias Classifier against
Adversarial Attacks
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2111.04404v1
- Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 12:14:29 GMT
- Title: Robust and Information-theoretically Safe Bias Classifier against
Adversarial Attacks
- Abstract summary: bias part of a DNN with Relu is introduced as the activation function is used as a classifier.
The bias part is a piecewise constant function with zero gradient and hence cannot be directly attacked by gradient-based methods.
It is proved that by adding a proper random first-degree part to the bias classifier, an information-theoretically safe classifier against the original-model gradient-based attack is obtained.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: In this paper, the bias classifier is introduced, that is, the bias part of a
DNN with Relu as the activation function is used as a classifier. The work is
motivated by the fact that the bias part is a piecewise constant function with
zero gradient and hence cannot be directly attacked by gradient-based methods
to generate adversaries such as FGSM. The existence of the bias classifier is
proved an effective training method for the bias classifier is proposed. It is
proved that by adding a proper random first-degree part to the bias classifier,
an information-theoretically safe classifier against the original-model
gradient-based attack is obtained in the sense that the attack generates a
totally random direction for generating adversaries. This seems to be the first
time that the concept of information-theoretically safe classifier is proposed.
Several attack methods for the bias classifier are proposed and numerical
experiments are used to show that the bias classifier is more robust than DNNs
against these attacks in most cases.
Related papers
- ALBAR: Adversarial Learning approach to mitigate Biases in Action Recognition [52.537021302246664]
Action recognition models often suffer from background bias (i.e., inferring actions based on background cues) and foreground bias (i.e., relying on subject appearance)
We propose ALBAR, a novel adversarial training method that mitigates foreground and background biases without requiring specialized knowledge of the bias attributes.
We evaluate our method on established background and foreground bias protocols, setting a new state-of-the-art and strongly improving combined debiasing performance by over 12% absolute on HMDB51.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-31T20:47:06Z) - CosFairNet:A Parameter-Space based Approach for Bias Free Learning [1.9116784879310025]
Deep neural networks trained on biased data often inadvertently learn unintended inference rules.
We introduce a novel approach to address bias directly in the model's parameter space, preventing its propagation across layers.
We show enhanced classification accuracy and debiasing effectiveness across various synthetic and real-world datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-19T13:06:40Z) - Towards Fair Classification against Poisoning Attacks [52.57443558122475]
We study the poisoning scenario where the attacker can insert a small fraction of samples into training data.
We propose a general and theoretically guaranteed framework which accommodates traditional defense methods to fair classification against poisoning attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-18T00:49:58Z) - Ensembling over Classifiers: a Bias-Variance Perspective [13.006468721874372]
We build upon the extension to the bias-variance decomposition by Pfau (2013) in order to gain crucial insights into the behavior of ensembles of classifiers.
We show that conditional estimates necessarily incur an irreducible error.
Empirically, standard ensembling reducesthe bias, leading us to hypothesize that ensembles of classifiers may perform well in part because of this unexpected reduction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-21T17:46:35Z) - Prototypical Classifier for Robust Class-Imbalanced Learning [64.96088324684683]
We propose textitPrototypical, which does not require fitting additional parameters given the embedding network.
Prototypical produces balanced and comparable predictions for all classes even though the training set is class-imbalanced.
We test our method on CIFAR-10LT, CIFAR-100LT and Webvision datasets, observing that Prototypical obtains substaintial improvements compared with state of the arts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-22T01:55:01Z) - BiaSwap: Removing dataset bias with bias-tailored swapping augmentation [20.149645246997668]
Deep neural networks often make decisions based on the spurious correlations inherent in the dataset, failing to generalize in an unbiased data distribution.
This paper proposes a novel bias-tailored augmentation-based approach, BiaSwap, for learning debiased representation without requiring supervision on the bias type.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-23T08:35:26Z) - Poisoned classifiers are not only backdoored, they are fundamentally
broken [84.67778403778442]
Under a commonly-studied backdoor poisoning attack against classification models, an attacker adds a small trigger to a subset of the training data.
It is often assumed that the poisoned classifier is vulnerable exclusively to the adversary who possesses the trigger.
In this paper, we show empirically that this view of backdoored classifiers is incorrect.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-18T19:42:44Z) - AdvFlow: Inconspicuous Black-box Adversarial Attacks using Normalizing
Flows [11.510009152620666]
We introduce AdvFlow: a novel black-box adversarial attack method on image classifiers.
We see that the proposed method generates adversaries that closely follow the clean data distribution, a property which makes their detection less likely.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-15T02:13:49Z) - Anomaly Detection-Based Unknown Face Presentation Attack Detection [74.4918294453537]
Anomaly detection-based spoof attack detection is a recent development in face Presentation Attack Detection.
In this paper, we present a deep-learning solution for anomaly detection-based spoof attack detection.
The proposed approach benefits from the representation learning power of the CNNs and learns better features for fPAD task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-11T21:20:55Z) - Learning from Failure: Training Debiased Classifier from Biased
Classifier [76.52804102765931]
We show that neural networks learn to rely on spurious correlation only when it is "easier" to learn than the desired knowledge.
We propose a failure-based debiasing scheme by training a pair of neural networks simultaneously.
Our method significantly improves the training of the network against various types of biases in both synthetic and real-world datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-06T07:20:29Z) - Certified Robustness to Label-Flipping Attacks via Randomized Smoothing [105.91827623768724]
Machine learning algorithms are susceptible to data poisoning attacks.
We present a unifying view of randomized smoothing over arbitrary functions.
We propose a new strategy for building classifiers that are pointwise-certifiably robust to general data poisoning attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-07T21:28:30Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.