Misspecified Gaussian Process Bandit Optimization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2111.05008v1
• Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 09:00:02 GMT
• Title: Misspecified Gaussian Process Bandit Optimization
• Authors: Ilija Bogunovic and Andreas Krause
• Abstract summary: Kernelized bandit algorithms have shown strong empirical and theoretical performance for this problem. We introduce a emphmisspecified kernelized bandit setting where the unknown function can be $epsilon$--uniformly approximated by a function with a bounded norm in some Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space (RKHS) We show that our algorithm achieves optimal dependence on $epsilon$ with no prior knowledge of misspecification.
• Score: 59.30399661155574
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We consider the problem of optimizing a black-box function based on noisy bandit feedback. Kernelized bandit algorithms have shown strong empirical and theoretical performance for this problem. They heavily rely on the assumption that the model is well-specified, however, and can fail without it. Instead, we introduce a \emph{misspecified} kernelized bandit setting where the unknown function can be $\epsilon$--uniformly approximated by a function with a bounded norm in some Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space (RKHS). We design efficient and practical algorithms whose performance degrades minimally in the presence of model misspecification. Specifically, we present two algorithms based on Gaussian process (GP) methods: an optimistic EC-GP-UCB algorithm that requires knowing the misspecification error, and Phased GP Uncertainty Sampling, an elimination-type algorithm that can adapt to unknown model misspecification. We provide upper bounds on their cumulative regret in terms of $\epsilon$, the time horizon, and the underlying kernel, and we show that our algorithm achieves optimal dependence on $\epsilon$ with no prior knowledge of misspecification. In addition, in a stochastic contextual setting, we show that EC-GP-UCB can be effectively combined with the regret bound balancing strategy and attain similar regret bounds despite not knowing $\epsilon$.

Related papers

• Regret Bounds for Expected Improvement Algorithms in Gaussian Process Bandit Optimization [63.8557841188626]
  The expected improvement (EI) algorithm is one of the most popular strategies for optimization under uncertainty. We propose a variant of EI with a standard incumbent defined via the GP predictive mean. We show that our algorithm converges, and achieves a cumulative regret bound of $mathcal O(gamma_TsqrtT)$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-15T13:17:53Z)
• Gaussian Process Bandit Optimization with Few Batches [49.896920704012395]
  We introduce a batch algorithm inspired by finite-arm bandit algorithms. We show that it achieves the cumulative regret upper bound $Oast(sqrtTgamma_T)$ using $O(loglog T)$ batches within time horizon $T$. In addition, we propose a modified version of our algorithm, and characterize how the regret is impacted by the number of batches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-15T00:54:04Z)
• Adapting to Misspecification in Contextual Bandits [82.55565343668246]
  We introduce a new family of oracle-efficient algorithms for $varepsilon$-misspecified contextual bandits. We obtain the first algorithm that achieves the optimal $O(dsqrtT + varepsilonsqrtdT)$ regret bound for unknown misspecification level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-12T21:30:41Z)
• Adversarial Robustness Guarantees for Gaussian Processes [22.403365399119107]
  Gaussian processes (GPs) enable principled computation of model uncertainty, making them attractive for safety-critical applications. We present a framework to analyse adversarial robustness of GPs, defined as invariance of the model's decision to bounded perturbations. We develop a branch-and-bound scheme to refine the bounds and show, for any $epsilon > 0$, that our algorithm is guaranteed to converge to values $epsilon$-close to the actual values in finitely many iterations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-07T15:14:56Z)
• Lenient Regret and Good-Action Identification in Gaussian Process Bandits [43.03669155559218]
  We study the problem of Gaussian process (GP) bandits under relaxed optimization criteria stating that any function value above a certain threshold is "good enough" On the practical side, we consider the problem of finding a single "good action" according to a known pre-specified threshold, and introduce several good-action identification algorithms that exploit knowledge of the threshold.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-11T01:16:58Z)
• Large-Scale Methods for Distributionally Robust Optimization [53.98643772533416]
  We prove that our algorithms require a number of evaluations gradient independent of training set size and number of parameters. Experiments on MNIST and ImageNet confirm the theoretical scaling of our algorithms, which are 9--36 times more efficient than full-batch methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-12T17:41:44Z)
• Multi-Scale Zero-Order Optimization of Smooth Functions in an RKHS [19.252319300590653]
  A black-box function $f:mathcalX mapsto mathbbR$ is optimized under the assumption that $f$ is H"older smooth and has bounded norm in the RKHS associated with a given kernel $K$. In this paper, we propose a new algorithm (textttLP-GP-UCB) where the usual GP surrogate model is augmented with Local Polynomial (LP) estimators of the H" smooth parameter $f$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-11T01:55:39Z)
• Regret and Belief Complexity Trade-off in Gaussian Process Bandits via Information Thresholding [42.669970064867556]
  We show how to characterize the trade-off between regret bounds of GP bandit algorithms and complexity of the posterior distributions. We observe state of the art accuracy and complexity trade-offs for GP bandit algorithms applied to global optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-23T21:05:15Z)
• Corruption-Tolerant Gaussian Process Bandit Optimization [130.60115798580136]
  We consider the problem of optimizing an unknown (typically non-producing) function with a bounded norm. We introduce an algorithm based on Fast-Slow GP-UCB based on "fast but non-robust" and "slow" We argue that certain dependencies cannot be required depending on the corruption level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-04T09:46:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.