Psycho-linguistic differences among competing vaccination communities on social media

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2111.05237v2
• Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 06:26:34 GMT
• Title: Psycho-linguistic differences among competing vaccination communities on social media
• Authors: Jialiang Shi and Piyush Ghasiya and Kazutoshi Sasahara
• Abstract summary: During the COVID-19 pandemic, anti-vaxxers use social media to distribute fake news and anxiety-provoking information about the vaccine. Here, we characterize the psycho-linguistic features of anti-vaxxers on the online social network Twitter.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Currently, the significance of social media in disseminating noteworthy information on topics such as health, politics, and the economy is indisputable. During the COVID-19 pandemic, anti-vaxxers use social media to distribute fake news and anxiety-provoking information about the vaccine, which may harm the public. Here, we characterize the psycho-linguistic features of anti-vaxxers on the online social network Twitter. For this, we collected COVID-19 related tweets from February 2020 to June 2021 to analyse vaccination stance, linguistic features, and social network characteristics. Our results demonstrated that, compared to pro-vaxxers, anti-vaxxers tend to have more negative emotions, narrative thinking, and worse moral tendencies. This study can advance our understanding of the online anti-vaccination movement, and become critical for social media management and policy action during and after the pandemic.

Related papers

• An analysis of vaccine-related sentiments from development to deployment of COVID-19 vaccines [0.31317409221921144]
  We analyse Twitter sentiments from the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic using a sentiment analysis framework via deep learning models. Our results show a link between the number of tweets, the number of cases, and the change in sentiment polarity scores during major waves of COVID-19 cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-23T22:10:05Z)
• Global misinformation spillovers in the online vaccination debate before and during COVID-19 [5.1598868036106085]
  Anti-vaccination views pervade online social media, fueling distrust in scientific expertise and increasing vaccine-hesitant individuals. Here, we leverage 316 million vaccine-related Twitter messages in 18 languages to quantify misinformation flows between users exposed to anti-vaccination (no-vax) content. We find that, during the pandemic, no-vax communities became more central in the country-specific debates and their cross-border connections strengthened, revealing a global Twitter anti-vaccination network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-21T14:32:37Z)
• Doctors vs. Nurses: Understanding the Great Divide in Vaccine Hesitancy among Healthcare Workers [64.1526243118151]
  We find that doctors are overall more positive toward the COVID-19 vaccines. Doctors are more concerned with the effectiveness of the vaccines over newer variants. Nurses pay more attention to the potential side effects on children.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-11T14:22:16Z)
• "COVID-19 was a FIFA conspiracy #curropt": An Investigation into the Viral Spread of COVID-19 Misinformation [60.268682953952506]
  We estimate the extent to which misinformation has influenced the course of the COVID-19 pandemic using natural language processing models. We provide a strategy to combat social media posts that are likely to cause widespread harm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-12T19:41:01Z)
• Automated clustering of COVID-19 anti-vaccine discourse on Twitter [0.0]
  An observational study of Twitter vaccine discourse is found in Ojea Quintana et al. This work expands upon Ojea Quintana et al. (2021) with two main contributions from data science. First, based on the authors' initial network clustering and qualitative analysis techniques, we are able to clearly demarcate and visualize the language patterns used in discourse by Antivaxxers. Second, using the characteristics of Antivaxxers' tweets, we develop text classifiers to determine the likelihood a given user is employing anti-vaccination language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-03T07:38:31Z)
• Sentiment Analysis and Topic Modeling for COVID-19 Vaccine Discussions [10.194753795363667]
  We conduct an in-depth analysis of tweets related to the coronavirus vaccine on Twitter. Results show that a majority of people are confident in the effectiveness of vaccines and are willing to get vaccinated. Negative tweets are often associated with the complaints of vaccine shortages, side effects after injections and possible death after being vaccinated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-08T23:30:17Z)
• American Twitter Users Revealed Social Determinants-related Oral Health Disparities amid the COVID-19 Pandemic [72.44305630014534]
  We collected oral health-related tweets during the COVID-19 pandemic from 9,104 Twitter users across 26 states. Women and younger adults (19-29) are more likely to talk about oral health problems. People from counties at a higher risk of COVID-19 talk more about tooth decay/gum bleeding and chipped tooth/tooth break.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-16T01:10:06Z)
• COVID-19 Vaccine and Social Media: Exploring Emotions and Discussions on Twitter [9.834635805575582]
  Public response to COVID-19 vaccines is the key success factor to control the COVID-19 pandemic. Traditional surveys are expensive and time-consuming, address limited health topics, and obtain small-scale data. This study proposes an approach using computational and human coding methods to collect and analyze a large number of tweets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-29T17:31:11Z)
• Dark Web Marketplaces and COVID-19: before the vaccine [53.447910186085586]
  We analyse 851,199 listings extracted from 30 dark web marketplaces between January 1, 2020 and November 16, 2020. We identify 788 listings directly related to COVID-19 products and monitor the temporal evolution of product categories. We reveal how the online shadow economy has evolved during the COVID-19 pandemic and highlight the importance of a continuous monitoring of DWMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-04T14:27:41Z)
• The Ivory Tower Lost: How College Students Respond Differently than the General Public to the COVID-19 Pandemic [66.80677233314002]
  Pandemic of the novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has presented governments with ultimate challenges. In the United States, the country with the highest confirmed COVID-19 infection cases, a nationwide social distancing protocol has been implemented by the President. This paper aims to discover the social implications of this unprecedented disruption in our interactive society by mining people's opinions on social media.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-21T13:02:38Z)
• Falling into the Echo Chamber: the Italian Vaccination Debate on Twitter [65.7192861893042]
  We examine the extent to which the vaccination debate on Twitter is conductive to potential outreach to the vaccination hesitant. We discover that the vaccination skeptics, as well as the advocates, reside in their own distinct "echo chambers" At the center of these echo chambers we find the ardent supporters, for which we build highly accurate network- and content-based classifiers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-26T13:55:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.