Strategic COVID-19 vaccine distribution can simultaneously elevate social utility and equity

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2111.06689v1
• Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 12:31:11 GMT
• Title: Strategic COVID-19 vaccine distribution can simultaneously elevate social utility and equity
• Authors: Lin Chen, Fengli Xu, Zhenyu Han, Kun Tang, Pan Hui, James Evans, Yong Li
• Abstract summary: Social utility and equity can be simultaneously improved when vaccine access is prioritized for the most disadvantaged communities. We design two behavior-and-demography-aware indices, community risk and societal harm, which capture the risks communities face and those they impose on society from not being vaccinated.
• Score: 22.800692128612983
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Balancing social utility and equity in distributing limited vaccines represents a critical policy concern for protecting against the prolonged COVID-19 pandemic. What is the nature of the trade-off between maximizing collective welfare and minimizing disparities between more and less privileged communities? To evaluate vaccination strategies, we propose a novel epidemic model that explicitly accounts for both demographic and mobility differences among communities and their association with heterogeneous COVID-19 risks, then calibrate it with large-scale data. Using this model, we find that social utility and equity can be simultaneously improved when vaccine access is prioritized for the most disadvantaged communities, which holds even when such communities manifest considerable vaccine reluctance. Nevertheless, equity among distinct demographic features are in tension due to their complex correlation in society. We design two behavior-and-demography-aware indices, community risk and societal harm, which capture the risks communities face and those they impose on society from not being vaccinated, to inform the design of comprehensive vaccine distribution strategies. Our study provides a framework for uniting utility and equity-based considerations in vaccine distribution, and sheds light on how to balance multiple ethical values in complex settings for epidemic control.

Related papers

• Dynamical evolution of social network polarization and its impact on the propagation of a virus [0.0]
  We analyse the dynamical polarization within a social network as well as the network properties before and after a vaccine was made available. We simulate the propagation of a virus in a polarized society by assigning vaccines to pro-vaccine individuals and none to the anti-vaccine individuals. In polarized networks, we observe a significantly more widespread diffusion of the virus, highlighting the importance of considering polarization for epidemic forecasting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T15:00:05Z)
• Promoting Fair Vaccination Strategies Through Influence Maximization: A Case Study on COVID-19 Spread [5.505634045241288]
  The aftermath of the Covid-19 pandemic saw more severe outcomes for racial minority groups and economically-deprived communities. We propose a novel approach to develop vaccination strategies which incorporate demographic fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T20:54:18Z)
• Agent-Based Model: Simulating a Virus Expansion Based on the Acceptance of Containment Measures [65.62256987706128]
  Compartmental epidemiological models categorize individuals based on their disease status. We propose an ABM architecture that combines an adapted SEIRD model with a decision-making model for citizens. We illustrate the designed model by examining the progression of SARS-CoV-2 infections in A Coruna, Spain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-28T08:01:05Z)
• Evaluating COVID-19 vaccine allocation policies using Bayesian $m$-top exploration [53.122045119395594]
  We present a novel technique for evaluating vaccine allocation strategies using a multi-armed bandit framework. $m$-top exploration allows the algorithm to learn $m$ policies for which it expects the highest utility. We consider the Belgian COVID-19 epidemic using the individual-based model STRIDE, where we learn a set of vaccination policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-30T12:22:30Z)
• Evaluating vaccine allocation strategies using simulation-assisted causal modelling [7.9656669215132005]
  Early on during a pandemic, vaccine availability is limited, requiring prioritisation of different population groups. We develop a model to retrospectively evaluate age-dependent counterfactual vaccine allocation strategies against the COVID-19 pandemic. We compare Israel's implemented vaccine allocation strategy in 2021 to counterfactual strategies such as no prioritisation, prioritisation of younger age groups or a strict risk-ranked approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-14T14:24:17Z)
• Deploying Vaccine Distribution Sites for Improved Accessibility and Equity to Support Pandemic Response [21.13458519284399]
  Many countries have mandated social distancing and banned large group gatherings in order to slow down the spread of SARS-CoV-2. These social interventions along with vaccines remain the best way forward to reduce the spread of SARS CoV-2. In order to increase vaccine accessibility, states such as Virginia have deployed mobile vaccination centers to distribute vaccines across the state.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-09T19:57:55Z)
• Epidemic mitigation by statistical inference from contact tracing data [61.04165571425021]
  We develop Bayesian inference methods to estimate the risk that an individual is infected. We propose to use probabilistic risk estimation in order to optimize testing and quarantining strategies for the control of an epidemic. Our approaches translate into fully distributed algorithms that only require communication between individuals who have recently been in contact.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-20T12:24:45Z)
• Controlling the Outbreak of COVID-19: A Noncooperative Game Perspective [61.558752620308134]
  Isolation and social distancing seem to be effective preventive measures to control this pandemic. We propose a noncooperative game that can provide an incentive for maintaining social distancing to prevent the spread of COVID-19. Numerical results show that the individual incentive increases more than 85% with an increasing percentage of home isolation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-27T04:28:32Z)
• Characterizing Sociolinguistic Variation in the Competing Vaccination Communities [9.72602429875255]
  "Framing" and "personalization" of the message is one of the key features for devising a persuasive messaging strategy. In the context of health-related misinformation, vaccination remains to be the most prevalent topic of discord. We conduct a sociolinguistic analysis of the two competing vaccination communities on Twitter.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-08T03:05:28Z)
• COVI White Paper [67.04578448931741]
  Contact tracing is an essential tool to change the course of the Covid-19 pandemic. We present an overview of the rationale, design, ethical considerations and privacy strategy of COVI,' a Covid-19 public peer-to-peer contact tracing and risk awareness mobile application developed in Canada.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-18T07:40:49Z)
• Digital Ariadne: Citizen Empowerment for Epidemic Control [55.41644538483948]
  The COVID-19 crisis represents the most dangerous threat to public health since the H1N1 pandemic of 1918. Technology-assisted location and contact tracing, if broadly adopted, may help limit the spread of infectious diseases. We present a tool, called 'diAry' or 'digital Ariadne', based on voluntary location and Bluetooth tracking on personal devices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-16T15:53:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.