The Evolving Path of "the Right to Be Left Alone" - When Privacy Meets
Technology
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2111.12434v1
- Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 11:27:55 GMT
- Title: The Evolving Path of "the Right to Be Left Alone" - When Privacy Meets
Technology
- Authors: Michela Iezzi
- Abstract summary: This paper proposes a novel vision of the privacy ecosystem, introducing privacy dimensions, the related users' expectations, the privacy violations, and the changing factors.
We believe that promising approaches to tackle the privacy challenges move in two directions: (i) identification of effective privacy metrics; and (ii) adoption of formal tools to design privacy-compliant applications.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: This paper deals with the hot, evergreen topic of the relationship between
privacy and technology. We give extensive motivation for why the privacy debate
is still alive for private citizens and institutions, and we investigate the
privacy concept. This paper proposes a novel vision of the privacy ecosystem,
introducing privacy dimensions, the related users' expectations, the privacy
violations, and the changing factors. We provide a critical assessment of the
Privacy by Design paradigm, strategies, tactics, patterns, and
Privacy-Enhancing Technologies, highlighting the current open issues. We
believe that promising approaches to tackle the privacy challenges move in two
directions: (i) identification of effective privacy metrics; and (ii) adoption
of formal tools to design privacy-compliant applications.
Related papers
- Differential Privacy Overview and Fundamental Techniques [63.0409690498569]
This chapter is meant to be part of the book "Differential Privacy in Artificial Intelligence: From Theory to Practice"
It starts by illustrating various attempts to protect data privacy, emphasizing where and why they failed.
It then defines the key actors, tasks, and scopes that make up the domain of privacy-preserving data analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-07T13:52:11Z) - PrivacyLens: Evaluating Privacy Norm Awareness of Language Models in Action [54.11479432110771]
PrivacyLens is a novel framework designed to extend privacy-sensitive seeds into expressive vignettes and further into agent trajectories.
We instantiate PrivacyLens with a collection of privacy norms grounded in privacy literature and crowdsourced seeds.
State-of-the-art LMs, like GPT-4 and Llama-3-70B, leak sensitive information in 25.68% and 38.69% of cases, even when prompted with privacy-enhancing instructions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-29T17:58:38Z) - Models Matter: Setting Accurate Privacy Expectations for Local and Central Differential Privacy [14.40391109414476]
We design and evaluate new explanations of differential privacy for the local and central models.
We find that consequences-focused explanations in the style of privacy nutrition labels are a promising approach for setting accurate privacy expectations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-16T01:21:57Z) - A Unified View of Differentially Private Deep Generative Modeling [60.72161965018005]
Data with privacy concerns comes with stringent regulations that frequently prohibited data access and data sharing.
Overcoming these obstacles is key for technological progress in many real-world application scenarios that involve privacy sensitive data.
Differentially private (DP) data publishing provides a compelling solution, where only a sanitized form of the data is publicly released.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-27T14:38:16Z) - A Critical Take on Privacy in a Datafied Society [0.0]
I analyze several facets of the lack of online privacy and idiosyncrasies exhibited by privacy advocates.
I discuss of possible effects of datafication on human behavior, the prevalent market-oriented assumption at the base of online privacy, and some emerging adaptation strategies.
A glimpse on the likely problematic future is provided with a discussion on privacy related aspects of EU, UK, and China's proposed generative AI policies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-03T11:45:18Z) - Advancing Differential Privacy: Where We Are Now and Future Directions for Real-World Deployment [100.1798289103163]
We present a detailed review of current practices and state-of-the-art methodologies in the field of differential privacy (DP)
Key points and high-level contents of the article were originated from the discussions from "Differential Privacy (DP): Challenges Towards the Next Frontier"
This article aims to provide a reference point for the algorithmic and design decisions within the realm of privacy, highlighting important challenges and potential research directions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-14T05:29:18Z) - Privacy Explanations - A Means to End-User Trust [64.7066037969487]
We looked into how explainability might help to tackle this problem.
We created privacy explanations that aim to help to clarify to end users why and for what purposes specific data is required.
Our findings reveal that privacy explanations can be an important step towards increasing trust in software systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-18T09:30:37Z) - User Perception of Privacy with Ubiquitous Devices [5.33024001730262]
This study aims to explore and discover various concerns related to perception of privacy in this era of ubiquitous technologies.
Key themes like attitude towards privacy in public and private spaces, privacy awareness, consent seeking, dilemmas/confusions related to various technologies, impact of attitude and beliefs on individuals actions regarding how to protect oneself from invasion of privacy in both public and private spaces.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-23T05:01:44Z) - Privacy and Robustness in Federated Learning: Attacks and Defenses [74.62641494122988]
We conduct the first comprehensive survey on this topic.
Through a concise introduction to the concept of FL, and a unique taxonomy covering: 1) threat models; 2) poisoning attacks and defenses against robustness; 3) inference attacks and defenses against privacy, we provide an accessible review of this important topic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-07T12:11:45Z) - The Challenges and Impact of Privacy Policy Comprehension [0.0]
This paper experimentally manipulated the privacy-friendliness of an unavoidable and simple privacy policy.
Half of our participants miscomprehended even this transparent privacy policy.
To mitigate such pitfalls we present design recommendations to improve the quality of informed consent.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-18T14:16:48Z) - Dis-Empowerment Online: An Investigation of Privacy-Sharing Perceptions
& Method Preferences [6.09170287691728]
We find that perception of privacy empowerment differs from that of sharing across dimensions of meaningfulness, competence and choice.
We find similarities and differences in privacy method preference between the US, UK and Germany.
By mapping the perception of privacy dis-empowerment into patterns of privacy behavior online, this paper provides an important foundation for future research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-19T19:17:55Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.