Why interference phenomena do not capture the essence of quantum theory

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2111.13727v7
• Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 08:50:54 GMT
• Title: Why interference phenomena do not capture the essence of quantum theory
• Authors: Lorenzo Catani, Matthew Leifer, David Schmid, Robert W. Spekkens
• Abstract summary: Quantum interference phenomena are widely viewed as posing a challenge to the classical worldview. We show that such conclusions are not, in fact, forced on us by basic interference phenomena. We do so by describing an alternative to quantum theory, a statistical theory of a classical discrete field.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Quantum interference phenomena are widely viewed as posing a challenge to the classical worldview. Feynman even went so far as to proclaim that they are the only mystery and the basic peculiarity of quantum mechanics. Many have also argued that basic interference phenomena force us to accept a number of radical interpretational conclusions, including: that a photon is neither a particle nor a wave but rather a Jekyll-and-Hyde sort of entity that toggles between the two possibilities, that reality is observer-dependent, and that systems either do not have properties prior to measurements or else have properties that are subject to nonlocal or backwards-in-time causal influences. In this work, we show that such conclusions are not, in fact, forced on us by basic interference phenomena. We do so by describing an alternative to quantum theory, a statistical theory of a classical discrete field (the `toy field theory') that reproduces the relevant phenomenology of quantum interference while rejecting these radical interpretational claims. It also reproduces a number of related interference experiments that are thought to support these interpretational claims, such as the Elitzur-Vaidman bomb tester, Wheeler's delayed-choice experiment, and the quantum eraser experiment. The systems in the toy field theory are field modes, each of which possesses, at all times, both a particle-like property (a discrete occupation number) and a wave-like property (a discrete phase). Although these two properties are jointly possessed, the theory stipulates that they cannot be jointly known. The phenomenology that is generally cited in favour of nonlocal or backwards-in-time causal influences ends up being explained in terms of inferences about distant or past systems, and all that is observer-dependent is the observer's knowledge of reality, not reality itself.

Related papers

• The composition rule for quantum systems is not the only possible one [0.0]
  We argue that the composition postulate deserves to be experimentally scrutinised independently of the other features of quantum theory. We formulate a family of operational theories that are solely distinguished from quantum theory by their system-composition rule.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-24T19:31:13Z)
• Quantum Mechanical Reality: Entanglement and Decoherence [0.0]
  We look into the ontology of quantum theory as distinct from that of the classical theory in the sciences. Within this framework, theories are conceptual constructs applying to models generated in the phenomenal world within limited contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-22T19:08:00Z)
• Quantum Instability [30.674987397533997]
  We show how a time-independent, finite-dimensional quantum system can give rise to a linear instability corresponding to that in the classical system. An unstable quantum system has a richer spectrum and a much longer recurrence time than a stable quantum system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-05T19:53:46Z)
• Reply to "Comment on 'Why interference phenomena do not capture the essence of quantum theory' " [0.0]
  We argue that the phenomenology of interference that is traditionally regarded as problematic does not, in fact, capture the essence of quantum theory. It does so by demonstrating the existence of a physical theory, which we term the "toy field theory", that reproduces this phenomenology but which does not sacrifice the classical worldview.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-24T18:59:35Z)
• Comment on "Why interference phenomena do not capture the essence of quantum theory" [0.0]
  Catani et al argue that it is possible to reproduce the phenomenology of quantum interference classically. We here want to point out some problems with their argument.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-04T18:03:52Z)
• Coherence interpretation of the delayed-choice quantum eraser [12.507208769851653]
  We experimentally demonstrate the violation of the cause-effect relation using coherent photons for the quantum eraser. The observed quantum eraser is coherently interpreted to seek the origin of the cause-effect violation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-13T00:28:22Z)
• Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
  We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world. We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z)
• Observations of on-demand quantum correlation using Poisson-distributed photon pairs [12.507208769851653]
  We experimentally demonstrate the secrete of quantumness using the wave nature of single photons. No clear answer exists for what quantum entanglement should be and how to generate it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-16T02:13:06Z)
• Operational Resource Theory of Imaginarity [48.7576911714538]
  We show that quantum states are easier to create and manipulate if they only have real elements. As an application, we show that imaginarity plays a crucial role for state discrimination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-29T14:03:38Z)
• Quantum Mechanical description of Bell's experiment assumes Locality [91.3755431537592]
  Bell's experiment description assumes the (Quantum Mechanics-language equivalent of the classical) condition of Locality. This result is complementary to a recently published one demonstrating that non-Locality is necessary to describe said experiment. It is concluded that, within the framework of Quantum Mechanics, there is absolutely no reason to believe in the existence of non-Local effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-27T15:04:08Z)
• A strong no-go theorem on the Wigner's friend paradox [0.0]
  We prove that if quantum evolution is controllable on the scale of an observer, then one of 'No-Superdeterminism', 'Locality' or 'Absoluteness of Observed Events' must be false. We show that although the violation of Bell-type inequalities in such scenarios is not in general sufficient to demonstrate the contradiction between those three assumptions, new inequalities can be derived in a theory-independent manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-07-12T08:09:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.