Label noise detection under the Noise at Random model with ensemble filters

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.01617v1
• Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 21:49:41 GMT
• Title: Label noise detection under the Noise at Random model with ensemble filters
• Authors: Kecia G. Moura, Ricardo B. C. Prud\^encio, George D. C. Cavalcanti
• Abstract summary: This work investigates the performance of ensemble noise detection under two different noise models. We investigate the effect of class distribution on noise detection performance since it changes the total noise level observed in a dataset.
• Score: 5.994719700262245
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Label noise detection has been widely studied in Machine Learning because of its importance in improving training data quality. Satisfactory noise detection has been achieved by adopting ensembles of classifiers. In this approach, an instance is assigned as mislabeled if a high proportion of members in the pool misclassifies it. Previous authors have empirically evaluated this approach; nevertheless, they mostly assumed that label noise is generated completely at random in a dataset. This is a strong assumption since other types of label noise are feasible in practice and can influence noise detection results. This work investigates the performance of ensemble noise detection under two different noise models: the Noisy at Random (NAR), in which the probability of label noise depends on the instance class, in comparison to the Noisy Completely at Random model, in which the probability of label noise is entirely independent. In this setting, we investigate the effect of class distribution on noise detection performance since it changes the total noise level observed in a dataset under the NAR assumption. Further, an evaluation of the ensemble vote threshold is conducted to contrast with the most common approaches in the literature. In many performed experiments, choosing a noise generation model over another can lead to different results when considering aspects such as class imbalance and noise level ratio among different classes.

Related papers

• NoisyAG-News: A Benchmark for Addressing Instance-Dependent Noise in Text Classification [7.464154519547575]
  Existing research on learning with noisy labels predominantly focuses on synthetic noise patterns. We constructed a benchmark dataset to better understand label noise in real-world text classification settings. Our findings reveal that while pre-trained models are resilient to synthetic noise, they struggle against instance-dependent noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-09T06:18:40Z)
• NoiseBench: Benchmarking the Impact of Real Label Noise on Named Entity Recognition [3.726602636064681]
  We present an analysis that shows that real noise is significantly more challenging than simulated noise. We show that current state-of-the-art models for noise-robust learning fall far short of their theoretically achievable upper bound.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-13T10:20:31Z)
• Extracting Clean and Balanced Subset for Noisy Long-tailed Classification [66.47809135771698]
  We develop a novel pseudo labeling method using class prototypes from the perspective of distribution matching. By setting a manually-specific probability measure, we can reduce the side-effects of noisy and long-tailed data simultaneously. Our method can extract this class-balanced subset with clean labels, which brings effective performance gains for long-tailed classification with label noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T07:34:37Z)
• Handling Realistic Label Noise in BERT Text Classification [1.0515439489916731]
  Real label noise is not random; rather, it is often correlated with input features or other annotator-specific factors. We show that the presence of these types of noise significantly degrades BERT classification performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T18:30:31Z)
• Optimizing the Noise in Self-Supervised Learning: from Importance Sampling to Noise-Contrastive Estimation [80.07065346699005]
  It is widely assumed that the optimal noise distribution should be made equal to the data distribution, as in Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) We turn to Noise-Contrastive Estimation which grounds this self-supervised task as an estimation problem of an energy-based model of the data. We soberly conclude that the optimal noise may be hard to sample from, and the gain in efficiency can be modest compared to choosing the noise distribution equal to the data's.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-23T19:57:58Z)
• The Optimal Noise in Noise-Contrastive Learning Is Not What You Think [80.07065346699005]
  We show that deviating from this assumption can actually lead to better statistical estimators. In particular, the optimal noise distribution is different from the data's and even from a different family.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-02T13:59:20Z)
• Training Classifiers that are Universally Robust to All Label Noise Levels [91.13870793906968]
  Deep neural networks are prone to overfitting in the presence of label noise. We propose a distillation-based framework that incorporates a new subcategory of Positive-Unlabeled learning. Our framework generally outperforms at medium to high noise levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-27T13:49:31Z)
• Analysing the Noise Model Error for Realistic Noisy Label Data [14.766574408868806]
  We study the quality of estimated noise models from the theoretical side by deriving the expected error of the noise model. We also publish NoisyNER, a new noisy label dataset from the NLP domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-24T17:45:15Z)
• A Second-Order Approach to Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise [58.555527517928596]
  The presence of label noise often misleads the training of deep neural networks. We show that the errors in human-annotated labels are more likely to be dependent on the difficulty levels of tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-22T06:36:58Z)
• Confidence Scores Make Instance-dependent Label-noise Learning Possible [129.84497190791103]
  In learning with noisy labels, for every instance, its label can randomly walk to other classes following a transition distribution which is named a noise model. We introduce confidence-scored instance-dependent noise (CSIDN), where each instance-label pair is equipped with a confidence score. We find with the help of confidence scores, the transition distribution of each instance can be approximately estimated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-11T16:15:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.