Probabilistic Deep Learning to Quantify Uncertainty in Air Quality Forecasting

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.02622v1
• Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2021 17:01:18 GMT
• Title: Probabilistic Deep Learning to Quantify Uncertainty in Air Quality Forecasting
• Authors: Abdulmajid Murad, Frank Alexander Kraemer, Kerstin Bach, Gavin Taylor
• Abstract summary: This work applies state-of-the-art techniques of uncertainty quantification in a real-world setting of air quality forecasts. We describe training probabilistic models and evaluate their predictive uncertainties based on empirical performance, reliability of confidence estimate, and practical applicability. Our experiments demonstrate that the proposed models perform better than previous works in quantifying uncertainty in data-driven air quality forecasts.
• Score: 5.007231239800297
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Data-driven forecasts of air quality have recently achieved more accurate short-term predictions. Despite their success, most of the current data-driven solutions lack proper quantifications of model uncertainty that communicate how much to trust the forecasts. Recently, several practical tools to estimate uncertainty have been developed in probabilistic deep learning. However, there have not been empirical applications and extensive comparisons of these tools in the domain of air quality forecasts. Therefore, this work applies state-of-the-art techniques of uncertainty quantification in a real-world setting of air quality forecasts. Through extensive experiments, we describe training probabilistic models and evaluate their predictive uncertainties based on empirical performance, reliability of confidence estimate, and practical applicability. We also propose improving these models using "free" adversarial training and exploiting temporal and spatial correlation inherent in air quality data. Our experiments demonstrate that the proposed models perform better than previous works in quantifying uncertainty in data-driven air quality forecasts. Overall, Bayesian neural networks provide a more reliable uncertainty estimate but can be challenging to implement and scale. Other scalable methods, such as deep ensemble, Monte Carlo (MC) dropout, and stochastic weight averaging-Gaussian (SWAG), can perform well if applied correctly but with different tradeoffs and slight variations in performance metrics. Finally, our results show the practical impact of uncertainty estimation and demonstrate that, indeed, probabilistic models are more suitable for making informed decisions. Code and dataset are available at \url{https://github.com/Abdulmajid-Murad/deep_probabilistic_forecast}

Related papers

• Uncertainty quantification for data-driven weather models [0.0]
  We study and compare uncertainty quantification methods to generate probabilistic weather forecasts from a state-of-the-art deterministic data-driven weather model, Pangu-Weather. Specifically, we compare approaches for quantifying forecast uncertainty based on generating ensemble forecasts via perturbations to the initial conditions. In a case study on medium-range forecasts of selected weather variables over Europe, the probabilistic forecasts obtained by using the Pangu-Weather model in concert with uncertainty quantification methods show promising results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-20T10:07:51Z)
• ExtremeCast: Boosting Extreme Value Prediction for Global Weather Forecast [57.6987191099507]
  We introduce Exloss, a novel loss function that performs asymmetric optimization and highlights extreme values to obtain accurate extreme weather forecast. We also introduce ExBooster, which captures the uncertainty in prediction outcomes by employing multiple random samples. Our solution can achieve state-of-the-art performance in extreme weather prediction, while maintaining the overall forecast accuracy comparable to the top medium-range forecast models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T10:34:13Z)
• Comparison of Uncertainty Quantification with Deep Learning in Time Series Regression [7.6146285961466]
  In this paper, different uncertainty estimation methods are compared to forecast meteorological time series data. Results show how each uncertainty estimation method performs on the forecasting task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-11T14:29:13Z)
• Measuring the Confidence of Traffic Forecasting Models: Techniques, Experimental Comparison and Guidelines towards Their Actionability [7.489793155793319]
  Uncertainty estimation provides the user with augmented information about the model's confidence in its predicted outcome. There is a thin consensus around the different types of uncertainty that one can gauge in machine learning models. This work aims to cover this lack of research by reviewing different techniques and metrics of uncertainty available in the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-28T10:49:55Z)
• Reliability-Aware Prediction via Uncertainty Learning for Person Image Retrieval [51.83967175585896]
  UAL aims at providing reliability-aware predictions by considering data uncertainty and model uncertainty simultaneously. Data uncertainty captures the noise" inherent in the sample, while model uncertainty depicts the model's confidence in the sample's prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-24T17:53:20Z)
• Uncertainty estimation of pedestrian future trajectory using Bayesian approximation [137.00426219455116]
  Under dynamic traffic scenarios, planning based on deterministic predictions is not trustworthy. The authors propose to quantify uncertainty during forecasting using approximation which deterministic approaches fail to capture. The effect of dropout weights and long-term prediction on future state uncertainty has been studied.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-04T04:23:38Z)
• Evaluation of Machine Learning Techniques for Forecast Uncertainty Quantification [0.13999481573773068]
  Ensemble forecasting is, so far, the most successful approach to produce relevant forecasts along with an estimation of their uncertainty. Main limitations of ensemble forecasting are the high computational cost and the difficulty to capture and quantify different sources of uncertainty. In this work proof-of-concept model experiments are conducted to examine the performance of ANNs trained to predict a corrected state of the system and the state uncertainty using only a single deterministic forecast as input.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-29T16:52:17Z)
• Dense Uncertainty Estimation [62.23555922631451]
  In this paper, we investigate neural networks and uncertainty estimation techniques to achieve both accurate deterministic prediction and reliable uncertainty estimation. We work on two types of uncertainty estimations solutions, namely ensemble based methods and generative model based methods, and explain their pros and cons while using them in fully/semi/weakly-supervised framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T01:23:48Z)
• When in Doubt: Neural Non-Parametric Uncertainty Quantification for Epidemic Forecasting [70.54920804222031]
  Most existing forecasting models disregard uncertainty quantification, resulting in mis-calibrated predictions. Recent works in deep neural models for uncertainty-aware time-series forecasting also have several limitations. We model the forecasting task as a probabilistic generative process and propose a functional neural process model called EPIFNP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T18:31:47Z)
• Learning Prediction Intervals for Model Performance [1.433758865948252]
  We propose a method to compute prediction intervals for model performance. We evaluate our approach across a wide range of drift conditions and show substantial improvement over competitive baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-15T21:32:03Z)
• Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
  We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation. We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.