Generating Useful Accident-Prone Driving Scenarios via a Learned Traffic Prior

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.05077v1
• Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 18:03:27 GMT
• Title: Generating Useful Accident-Prone Driving Scenarios via a Learned Traffic Prior
• Authors: Davis Rempe, Jonah Philion, Leonidas J. Guibas, Sanja Fidler, Or Litany
• Abstract summary: STRIVE is a method to automatically generate challenging scenarios that cause a given planner to produce undesirable behavior, like collisions. To maintain scenario plausibility, the key idea is to leverage a learned model of traffic motion in the form of a graph-based conditional VAE. A subsequent optimization is used to find a "solution" to the scenario, ensuring it is useful to improve the given planner.
• Score: 135.78858513845233
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Evaluating and improving planning for autonomous vehicles requires scalable generation of long-tail traffic scenarios. To be useful, these scenarios must be realistic and challenging, but not impossible to drive through safely. In this work, we introduce STRIVE, a method to automatically generate challenging scenarios that cause a given planner to produce undesirable behavior, like collisions. To maintain scenario plausibility, the key idea is to leverage a learned model of traffic motion in the form of a graph-based conditional VAE. Scenario generation is formulated as an optimization in the latent space of this traffic model, effected by perturbing an initial real-world scene to produce trajectories that collide with a given planner. A subsequent optimization is used to find a "solution" to the scenario, ensuring it is useful to improve the given planner. Further analysis clusters generated scenarios based on collision type. We attack two planners and show that STRIVE successfully generates realistic, challenging scenarios in both cases. We additionally "close the loop" and use these scenarios to optimize hyperparameters of a rule-based planner.

Related papers

• ReGentS: Real-World Safety-Critical Driving Scenario Generation Made Stable [88.08120417169971]
  Machine learning based autonomous driving systems often face challenges with safety-critical scenarios that are rare in real-world data. This work explores generating safety-critical driving scenarios by modifying complex real-world regular scenarios through trajectory optimization. Our approach addresses unrealistic diverging trajectories and unavoidable collision scenarios that are not useful for training robust planner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-12T08:26:33Z)
• Adversarial Safety-Critical Scenario Generation using Naturalistic Human Driving Priors [2.773055342671194]
  We introduce a natural adversarial scenario generation solution using naturalistic human driving priors and reinforcement learning techniques. Our findings demonstrate that the proposed model can generate realistic safety-critical test scenarios covering both naturalness and adversariality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-06T13:58:56Z)
• SAFE-SIM: Safety-Critical Closed-Loop Traffic Simulation with Diffusion-Controllable Adversaries [94.84458417662407]
  We introduce SAFE-SIM, a controllable closed-loop safety-critical simulation framework. Our approach yields two distinct advantages: 1) generating realistic long-tail safety-critical scenarios that closely reflect real-world conditions, and 2) providing controllable adversarial behavior for more comprehensive and interactive evaluations. We validate our framework empirically using the nuScenes and nuPlan datasets across multiple planners, demonstrating improvements in both realism and controllability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-31T04:14:43Z)
• Interpretable and Flexible Target-Conditioned Neural Planners For Autonomous Vehicles [22.396215670672852]
  Prior work only learns to estimate a single planning trajectory, while there may be multiple acceptable plans in real-world scenarios. We propose an interpretable neural planner to regress a heatmap, which effectively represents multiple potential goals in the bird's-eye view of an autonomous vehicle. Our systematic evaluation on the Lyft Open dataset shows that our model achieves a safer and more flexible driving performance than prior works.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-23T22:13:03Z)
• KING: Generating Safety-Critical Driving Scenarios for Robust Imitation via Kinematics Gradients [39.9379344872937]
  Current driving simulators exhibit na"ive behavior models for background traffic. Hand-tuned scenarios are typically added during simulation to induce safety-critical situations. We propose KING, which generates safety-critical driving scenarios with a 20% higher success rate than black-box optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-28T17:48:48Z)
• Generating and Characterizing Scenarios for Safety Testing of Autonomous Vehicles [86.9067793493874]
  We propose efficient mechanisms to characterize and generate testing scenarios using a state-of-the-art driving simulator. We use our method to characterize real driving data from the Next Generation Simulation (NGSIM) project. We rank the scenarios by defining metrics based on the complexity of avoiding accidents and provide insights into how the AV could have minimized the probability of incurring an accident.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-12T17:00:23Z)
• Deep Structured Reactive Planning [94.92994828905984]
  We propose a novel data-driven, reactive planning objective for self-driving vehicles. We show that our model outperforms a non-reactive variant in successfully completing highly complex maneuvers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-18T01:43:36Z)
• The Importance of Prior Knowledge in Precise Multimodal Prediction [71.74884391209955]
  Roads have well defined geometries, topologies, and traffic rules. In this paper we propose to incorporate structured priors as a loss function. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on real-world self-driving datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-04T03:56:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.