Rushing and Strolling among Answer Sets -- Navigation Made Easy
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.07596v1
- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 17:50:06 GMT
- Title: Rushing and Strolling among Answer Sets -- Navigation Made Easy
- Authors: Johannes K. Fichte, Sarah Alice Gaggl, Dominik Rusovac
- Abstract summary: We propose a framework for interactive navigation towards desired subsets of answer sets analogous to faceted browsing.
Our approach enables the user to explore the solution space by consciously zooming in or out of sub-spaces of solutions at a certain pace.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Answer set programming (ASP) is a popular declarative programming paradigm
with a wide range of applications in artificial intelligence. Oftentimes, when
modeling an AI problem with ASP, and in particular when we are interested
beyond simple search for optimal solutions, an actual solution, differences
between solutions, or number of solutions of the ASP program matter. For
example, when a user aims to identify a specific answer set according to her
needs, or requires the total number of diverging solutions to comprehend
probabilistic applications such as reasoning in medical domains. Then, there
are only certain problem specific and handcrafted encoding techniques available
to navigate the solution space of ASP programs, which is oftentimes not enough.
In this paper, we propose a formal and general framework for interactive
navigation towards desired subsets of answer sets analogous to faceted
browsing. Our approach enables the user to explore the solution space by
consciously zooming in or out of sub-spaces of solutions at a certain
configurable pace. We illustrate that weighted faceted navigation is
computationally hard. Finally, we provide an implementation of our approach
that demonstrates the feasibility of our framework for incomprehensible
solution spaces.
Related papers
- Creating Automated Quantum-Assisted Solutions for Optimization Problems [0.0]
We propose the QuaST decision tree, a framework that allows to explore, automate and evaluate solution paths.
Our setup is modular, highly structured and flexible enough to include any kind of preparation, pre-processing and post-processing steps.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-30T16:59:14Z) - Thought Propagation: An Analogical Approach to Complex Reasoning with Large Language Models [62.96551299003463]
We propose textbftextitThought Propagation (TP) to enhance the complex reasoning ability of Large Language Models.
TP first prompts LLMs to propose and solve a set of analogous problems that are related to the input one.
TP reuses the results of analogous problems to directly yield a new solution or derive a knowledge-intensive plan for execution to amend the initial solution obtained from scratch.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-06T01:40:09Z) - Explainable Answer-set Programming [0.0]
Project aims to fill some of these gaps and contribute to the state of the art in explainable ASP.
We tackle this by extending the language support of existing approaches but also by the development of novel explanation formalisms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-30T09:09:57Z) - Conjunctive Query Based Constraint Solving For Feature Model
Configuration [79.14348940034351]
We show how to apply conjunctive queries to solve constraint satisfaction problems.
This approach allows the application of a wide-spread database technology to solve configuration tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-26T10:08:07Z) - Tools and Methodologies for Verifying Answer Set Programs [0.0]
ASP is a powerful declarative programming paradigm commonly used for solving challenging search and optimization problems.
As an approach to Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, ASP benefits from its simplicity, conciseness and rigorously defined semantics.
My research is concerned with extending the theory and tools supporting the verification of ASP progams.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-05T10:50:21Z) - Efficient lifting of symmetry breaking constraints for complex
combinatorial problems [9.156939957189502]
This work extends the learning framework and implementation of a model-based approach for Answer Set Programming.
In particular, we incorporate a new conflict analysis algorithm in the Inductive Logic Programming system ILASP.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-14T20:42:13Z) - Preliminary Results on Using Abstract AND-OR Graphs for Generalized
Solving of Stochastic Shortest Path Problems [25.152899734616298]
Shortest Path Problems (SSPs) are goal-oriented problems in the real-world.
A key difficulty for computing solutions for SSPs is finding solutions to even moderately sized problems intractable.
We show that our approach can be embedded in any SSP solver to compute hierarchically optimal policies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-08T21:30:47Z) - Learning Proximal Operators to Discover Multiple Optima [66.98045013486794]
We present an end-to-end method to learn the proximal operator across non-family problems.
We show that for weakly-ized objectives and under mild conditions, the method converges globally.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-28T05:53:28Z) - A Mutual Information Maximization Approach for the Spurious Solution
Problem in Weakly Supervised Question Answering [60.768146126094955]
Weakly supervised question answering usually has only the final answers as supervision signals.
There may exist many spurious solutions that coincidentally derive the correct answer, but training on such solutions can hurt model performance.
We propose to explicitly exploit such semantic correlations by maximizing the mutual information between question-answer pairs and predicted solutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-14T05:47:41Z) - Discovering Diverse Solutions in Deep Reinforcement Learning [84.45686627019408]
Reinforcement learning algorithms are typically limited to learning a single solution of a specified task.
We propose an RL method that can learn infinitely many solutions by training a policy conditioned on a continuous or discrete low-dimensional latent variable.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-12T04:54:31Z) - Learning What to Defer for Maximum Independent Sets [84.00112106334655]
We propose a novel DRL scheme, coined learning what to defer (LwD), where the agent adaptively shrinks or stretch the number of stages by learning to distribute the element-wise decisions of the solution at each stage.
We apply the proposed framework to the maximum independent set (MIS) problem, and demonstrate its significant improvement over the current state-of-the-art DRL scheme.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-17T02:19:31Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.