Autonomous Reinforcement Learning: Formalism and Benchmarking

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.09605v1
• Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 16:28:06 GMT
• Title: Autonomous Reinforcement Learning: Formalism and Benchmarking
• Authors: Archit Sharma, Kelvin Xu, Nikhil Sardana, Abhishek Gupta, Karol Hausman, Sergey Levine, Chelsea Finn
• Abstract summary: Real-world embodied learning, such as that performed by humans and animals, is situated in a continual, non-episodic world. Common benchmark tasks in RL are episodic, with the environment resetting between trials to provide the agent with multiple attempts. This discrepancy presents a major challenge when attempting to take RL algorithms developed for episodic simulated environments and run them on real-world platforms.
• Score: 106.25788536376007
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) provides a naturalistic framing for learning through trial and error, which is appealing both because of its simplicity and effectiveness and because of its resemblance to how humans and animals acquire skills through experience. However, real-world embodied learning, such as that performed by humans and animals, is situated in a continual, non-episodic world, whereas common benchmark tasks in RL are episodic, with the environment resetting between trials to provide the agent with multiple attempts. This discrepancy presents a major challenge when attempting to take RL algorithms developed for episodic simulated environments and run them on real-world platforms, such as robots. In this paper, we aim to address this discrepancy by laying out a framework for Autonomous Reinforcement Learning (ARL): reinforcement learning where the agent not only learns through its own experience, but also contends with lack of human supervision to reset between trials. We introduce a simulated benchmark EARL around this framework, containing a set of diverse and challenging simulated tasks reflective of the hurdles introduced to learning when only a minimal reliance on extrinsic intervention can be assumed. We show that standard approaches to episodic RL and existing approaches struggle as interventions are minimized, underscoring the need for developing new algorithms for reinforcement learning with a greater focus on autonomy.

Related papers

• RLIF: Interactive Imitation Learning as Reinforcement Learning [56.997263135104504]
  We show how off-policy reinforcement learning can enable improved performance under assumptions that are similar but potentially even more practical than those of interactive imitation learning. Our proposed method uses reinforcement learning with user intervention signals themselves as rewards. This relaxes the assumption that intervening experts in interactive imitation learning should be near-optimal and enables the algorithm to learn behaviors that improve over the potential suboptimal human expert.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-21T21:05:21Z)
• Demonstration-free Autonomous Reinforcement Learning via Implicit and Bidirectional Curriculum [22.32327908453603]
  We propose a demonstration-free reinforcement learning algorithm via Implicit and Bi-directional Curriculum (IBC) With an auxiliary agent that is conditionally activated upon learning progress and a bidirectional goal curriculum based on optimal transport, our method outperforms previous methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-17T04:31:36Z)
• You Only Live Once: Single-Life Reinforcement Learning [124.1738675154651]
  In many real-world situations, the goal might not be to learn a policy that can do the task repeatedly, but simply to perform a new task successfully once in a single trial. We formalize this problem setting, where an agent must complete a task within a single episode without interventions. We propose an algorithm, $Q$-weighted adversarial learning (QWALE), which employs a distribution matching strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-17T09:00:11Z)
• Mastering the Unsupervised Reinforcement Learning Benchmark from Pixels [112.63440666617494]
  Reinforcement learning algorithms can succeed but require large amounts of interactions between the agent and the environment. We propose a new method to solve it, using unsupervised model-based RL, for pre-training the agent. We show robust performance on the Real-Word RL benchmark, hinting at resiliency to environment perturbations during adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-24T14:22:29Z)
• Zipfian environments for Reinforcement Learning [19.309119596790563]
  We show that learning robustly from skewed experience is a critical challenge for applying Deep RL methods beyond simulations or laboratories. We develop three complementary RL environments where the agent's experience varies according to a Zipfian (discrete power law) distribution. Our results show that learning robustly from skewed experience is a critical challenge for applying Deep RL methods beyond simulations or laboratories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-15T19:59:10Z)
• Persistent Reinforcement Learning via Subgoal Curricula [114.83989499740193]
  Value-accelerated Persistent Reinforcement Learning (VaPRL) generates a curriculum of initial states. VaPRL reduces the interventions required by three orders of magnitude compared to episodic reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-27T16:39:45Z)
• Bridging the Imitation Gap by Adaptive Insubordination [88.35564081175642]
  We show that when the teaching agent makes decisions with access to privileged information, this information is marginalized during imitation learning. We propose 'Adaptive Insubordination' (ADVISOR) to address this gap. ADVISOR dynamically weights imitation and reward-based reinforcement learning losses during training, enabling on-the-fly switching between imitation and exploration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-23T17:59:57Z)
• Human AI interaction loop training: New approach for interactive reinforcement learning [0.0]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) in various decision-making tasks of machine learning provides effective results with an agent learning from a stand-alone reward function. RL presents unique challenges with large amounts of environment states and action spaces, as well as in the determination of rewards. Imitation Learning (IL) offers a promising solution for those challenges using a teacher.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-09T15:27:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.