Developing a Trusted Human-AI Network for Humanitarian Benefit
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.11191v1
- Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 11:58:51 GMT
- Title: Developing a Trusted Human-AI Network for Humanitarian Benefit
- Authors: Susannah Kate Devitt, Jason Scholz, Timo Schless, Larry Lewis
- Abstract summary: We consider the integration of a communications protocol, distributed ledger technology, and information fusion with artificial intelligence (AI)
Such a trusted human-AI communication network could provide accountable information exchange regarding protected entities, critical infrastructure; humanitarian signals and status updates for humans and machines in conflicts.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Humans and artificial intelligences (AI) will increasingly participate
digitally and physically in conflicts, yet there is a lack of trusted
communications across agents and platforms. For example, humans in disasters
and conflict already use messaging and social media to share information,
however, international humanitarian relief organisations treat this information
as unverifiable and untrustworthy. AI may reduce the 'fog-of-war' and improve
outcomes, however AI implementations are often brittle, have a narrow scope of
application and wide ethical risks. Meanwhile, human error causes significant
civilian harms even by combatants committed to complying with international
humanitarian law. AI offers an opportunity to help reduce the tragedy of war
and deliver humanitarian aid to those who need it. In this paper we consider
the integration of a communications protocol (the 'Whiteflag protocol'),
distributed ledger technology, and information fusion with artificial
intelligence (AI), to improve conflict communications called 'Protected
Assurance Understanding Situation and Entities' (PAUSE). Such a trusted
human-AI communication network could provide accountable information exchange
regarding protected entities, critical infrastructure; humanitarian signals and
status updates for humans and machines in conflicts.
Related papers
- Combining Theory of Mind and Kindness for Self-Supervised Human-AI Alignment [0.0]
Current AI models prioritize task optimization over safety, leading to risks of unintended harm.
We propose a novel human-inspired approach which aims to address these various concerns and help align competing objectives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-21T22:04:44Z) - AI-Powered Autonomous Weapons Risk Geopolitical Instability and Threaten AI Research [6.96356867602455]
We argue that the recent embrace of machine learning in the development of autonomous weapons systems (AWS) creates serious risks to geopolitical stability and the free exchange of ideas in AI research.
ML is already enabling the substitution of AWS for human soldiers in many battlefield roles, reducing the upfront human cost, and thus political cost, of waging offensive war.
Further, the military value of AWS raises the specter of an AI-powered arms race and the misguided imposition of national security restrictions on AI research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-03T05:19:45Z) - Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress [171.05448842016125]
We describe risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems.
There is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them.
Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-26T17:59:06Z) - AI Potentiality and Awareness: A Position Paper from the Perspective of
Human-AI Teaming in Cybersecurity [18.324118502535775]
We argue that human-AI teaming is worthwhile in cybersecurity.
We emphasize the importance of a balanced approach that incorporates AI's computational power with human expertise.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-28T01:20:44Z) - The Promise and Peril of Artificial Intelligence -- Violet Teaming
Offers a Balanced Path Forward [56.16884466478886]
This paper reviews emerging issues with opaque and uncontrollable AI systems.
It proposes an integrative framework called violet teaming to develop reliable and responsible AI.
It emerged from AI safety research to manage risks proactively by design.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-28T02:10:38Z) - Intent-aligned AI systems deplete human agency: the need for agency
foundations research in AI safety [2.3572498744567127]
We argue that alignment to human intent is insufficient for safe AI systems.
We argue that preservation of long-term agency of humans may be a more robust standard.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-30T17:14:01Z) - Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society [68.8204255655161]
We take a closer look at AI fairness and analyze how lack of AI fairness can lead to deepening of biases over time.
We discuss how biased models can lead to more negative real-world outcomes for certain groups.
If the issues persist, they could be reinforced by interactions with other risks and have severe implications on society in the form of social unrest.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-16T11:22:59Z) - Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence for Cyber Security (AICS)
Workshop at AAAI 2022 [55.573187938617636]
The workshop will focus on the application of AI to problems in cyber security.
Cyber systems generate large volumes of data, utilizing this effectively is beyond human capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-28T18:27:41Z) - Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective [54.80482955088197]
We focus on six of the most crucial dimensions in achieving trustworthy AI: (i) Safety & Robustness, (ii) Non-discrimination & Fairness, (iii) Explainability, (iv) Privacy, (v) Accountability & Auditability, and (vi) Environmental Well-Being.
For each dimension, we review the recent related technologies according to a taxonomy and summarize their applications in real-world systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-12T14:21:46Z) - The Short Anthropological Guide to the Study of Ethical AI [91.3755431537592]
Short guide serves as both an introduction to AI ethics and social science and anthropological perspectives on the development of AI.
Aims to provide those unfamiliar with the field with an insight into the societal impact of AI systems and how, in turn, these systems can lead us to rethink how our world operates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-07T12:25:03Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.