Deep Learning Models for Knowledge Tracing: Review and Empirical Evaluation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.15072v1
• Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2021 14:19:27 GMT
• Title: Deep Learning Models for Knowledge Tracing: Review and Empirical Evaluation
• Authors: Sami Sarsa, Juho Leinonen, Arto Hellas
• Abstract summary: We review and evaluate a body of deep learning knowledge tracing (DLKT) models with openly available and widely-used data sets. The evaluated DLKT models have been reimplemented for assessing and replicability of previously reported results.
• Score: 2.423547527175807
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In this work, we review and evaluate a body of deep learning knowledge tracing (DLKT) models with openly available and widely-used data sets, and with a novel data set of students learning to program. The evaluated DLKT models have been reimplemented for assessing reproducibility and replicability of previously reported results. We test different input and output layer variations found in the compared models that are independent of the main architectures of the models, and different maximum attempt count options that have been implicitly and explicitly used in some studies. Several metrics are used to reflect on the quality of the evaluated knowledge tracing models. The evaluated knowledge tracing models include Vanilla-DKT, two Long Short-Term Memory Deep Knowledge Tracing (LSTM-DKT) variants, two Dynamic Key-Value Memory Network (DKVMN) variants, and Self-Attentive Knowledge Tracing (SAKT). We evaluate logistic regression, Bayesian Knowledge Tracing (BKT) and simple non-learning models as baselines. Our results suggest that the DLKT models in general outperform non-DLKT models, and the relative differences between the DLKT models are subtle and often vary between datasets. Our results also show that naive models such as mean prediction can yield better performance than more sophisticated knowledge tracing models, especially in terms of accuracy. Further, our metric and hyperparameter analysis shows that the metric used to select the best model hyperparameters has a noticeable effect on the performance of the models, and that metric choice can affect model ranking. We also study the impact of input and output layer variations, filtering out long attempt sequences, and non-model properties such as randomness and hardware. Finally, we discuss model performance replicability and related issues. Our model implementations, evaluation code, and data are published as a part of this work.

Related papers

• Supervised Score-Based Modeling by Gradient Boosting [49.556736252628745]
  We propose a Supervised Score-based Model (SSM) which can be viewed as a gradient boosting algorithm combining score matching. We provide a theoretical analysis of learning and sampling for SSM to balance inference time and prediction accuracy. Our model outperforms existing models in both accuracy and inference time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-02T07:06:53Z)
• Area under the ROC Curve has the Most Consistent Evaluation for Binary Classification [3.1850615666574806]
  This study investigates how consistent metrics are at evaluating different models under different data scenarios. I find that for binary classification tasks, evaluation metrics that are less influenced by prevalence offer more consistent ranking of a set of different models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T17:52:38Z)
• The Importance of Model Inspection for Better Understanding Performance Characteristics of Graph Neural Networks [15.569758991934934]
  We investigate the effect of modelling choices on the feature learning characteristics of graph neural networks applied to a brain shape classification task. We find substantial differences in the feature embeddings at different layers of the models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T13:26:18Z)
• The Role of Model Architecture and Scale in Predicting Molecular Properties: Insights from Fine-Tuning RoBERTa, BART, and LLaMA [0.0]
  This study introduces a systematic framework to compare the efficacy of Large Language Models (LLMs) for fine-tuning across various cheminformatics tasks. We assessed three well-known models-RoBERTa, BART, and LLaMA-on their ability to predict molecular properties. We found that LLaMA-based models generally offered the lowest validation loss, suggesting their superior adaptability across tasks and scales.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T02:20:12Z)
• QualEval: Qualitative Evaluation for Model Improvement [82.73561470966658]
  We propose QualEval, which augments quantitative scalar metrics with automated qualitative evaluation as a vehicle for model improvement. QualEval uses a powerful LLM reasoner and our novel flexible linear programming solver to generate human-readable insights. We demonstrate that leveraging its insights, for example, improves the absolute performance of the Llama 2 model by up to 15% points relative.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T00:21:44Z)
• The Languini Kitchen: Enabling Language Modelling Research at Different Scales of Compute [66.84421705029624]
  We introduce an experimental protocol that enables model comparisons based on equivalent compute, measured in accelerator hours. We pre-process an existing large, diverse, and high-quality dataset of books that surpasses existing academic benchmarks in quality, diversity, and document length. This work also provides two baseline models: a feed-forward model derived from the GPT-2 architecture and a recurrent model in the form of a novel LSTM with ten-fold throughput.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T10:31:17Z)
• A prediction and behavioural analysis of machine learning methods for modelling travel mode choice [0.26249027950824505]
  We conduct a systematic comparison of different modelling approaches, across multiple modelling problems, in terms of the key factors likely to affect model choice. Results indicate that the models with the highest disaggregate predictive performance provide poorer estimates of behavioural indicators and aggregate mode shares. It is also observed that the MNL model performs robustly in a variety of situations, though ML techniques can improve the estimates of behavioural indices such as Willingness to Pay.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-11T11:10:32Z)
• Dataless Knowledge Fusion by Merging Weights of Language Models [51.8162883997512]
  Fine-tuning pre-trained language models has become the prevalent paradigm for building downstream NLP models. This creates a barrier to fusing knowledge across individual models to yield a better single model. We propose a dataless knowledge fusion method that merges models in their parameter space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-19T20:46:43Z)
• An Empirical Study of Deep Learning Models for Vulnerability Detection [4.243592852049963]
  We surveyed and reproduced 9 state-of-the-art deep learning models on 2 widely used vulnerability detection datasets. We investigated model capabilities, training data, and model interpretation. Our findings can help better understand model results, provide guidance on preparing training data, and improve the robustness of the models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-15T19:49:34Z)
• Comparing Test Sets with Item Response Theory [53.755064720563]
  We evaluate 29 datasets using predictions from 18 pretrained Transformer models on individual test examples. We find that Quoref, HellaSwag, and MC-TACO are best suited for distinguishing among state-of-the-art models. We also observe span selection task format, which is used for QA datasets like QAMR or SQuAD2.0, is effective in differentiating between strong and weak models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-01T22:33:53Z)
• Improving the Reconstruction of Disentangled Representation Learners via Multi-Stage Modeling [54.94763543386523]
  Current autoencoder-based disentangled representation learning methods achieve disentanglement by penalizing the ( aggregate) posterior to encourage statistical independence of the latent factors. We present a novel multi-stage modeling approach where the disentangled factors are first learned using a penalty-based disentangled representation learning method. Then, the low-quality reconstruction is improved with another deep generative model that is trained to model the missing correlated latent variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-25T18:51:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.