Survey on the Convergence of Machine Learning and Blockchain
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.00976v1
- Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 04:47:45 GMT
- Title: Survey on the Convergence of Machine Learning and Blockchain
- Authors: Shengwen Ding, Chenhui Hu
- Abstract summary: Machine learning (ML) has been pervasively researched nowadays and it has been applied in many aspects of real life.
However, issues of model and data still accompany the development of ML.
With the utilization of blockchain, these problems can be efficiently solved.
- Score: 4.45999674917158
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Machine learning (ML) has been pervasively researched nowadays and it has
been applied in many aspects of real life. Nevertheless, issues of model and
data still accompany the development of ML. For instance, training of
traditional ML models is limited to the access of data sets, which are
generally proprietary; published ML models may soon be out of date without
update of new data and continuous training; malicious data contributors may
upload wrongly labeled data that leads to undesirable training results; and the
abuse of private data and data leakage also exit. With the utilization of
blockchain, an emerging and swiftly developing technology, these problems can
be efficiently solved. In this paper, we conduct a survey of the convergence of
collaborative ML and blockchain. We investigate different ways of combination
of these two technologies, and their fields of application. We also discuss the
limitations of current research and their future directions.
Related papers
- TDML -- A Trustworthy Distributed Machine Learning Framework [7.302091381583343]
The rapid advancement of large models (LM) has intensified the demand for computing resources.
This demand is exacerbated by limited availability due to supply chain delays and monopolistic acquisition by major tech firms.
We propose a textittrustworthy distributed machine learning (TDML) framework that leverages guidance to coordinate remote trainers and validate workloads.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-10T03:22:28Z) - The Frontier of Data Erasure: Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models [56.26002631481726]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are foundational to AI advancements.
LLMs pose risks by potentially memorizing and disseminating sensitive, biased, or copyrighted information.
Machine unlearning emerges as a cutting-edge solution to mitigate these concerns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-23T09:26:15Z) - Second-Order Information Matters: Revisiting Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models [1.443696537295348]
Privacy leakage and copyright violation are still underexplored.
Our unlearning algorithms are not only data-agnostic/model-agnostic but also proven to be robust in terms of utility preservation or privacy guarantee.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-13T18:57:30Z) - Learn to Unlearn: A Survey on Machine Unlearning [29.077334665555316]
This article presents a review of recent machine unlearning techniques, verification mechanisms, and potential attacks.
We highlight emerging challenges and prospective research directions.
We aim for this paper to provide valuable resources for integrating privacy, equity, andresilience into ML systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-12T14:28:02Z) - AI Model Disgorgement: Methods and Choices [127.54319351058167]
We introduce a taxonomy of possible disgorgement methods that are applicable to modern machine learning systems.
We investigate the meaning of "removing the effects" of data in the trained model in a way that does not require retraining from scratch.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-07T08:50:18Z) - Federated Learning and Meta Learning: Approaches, Applications, and
Directions [94.68423258028285]
In this tutorial, we present a comprehensive review of FL, meta learning, and federated meta learning (FedMeta)
Unlike other tutorial papers, our objective is to explore how FL, meta learning, and FedMeta methodologies can be designed, optimized, and evolved, and their applications over wireless networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-24T10:59:29Z) - A Survey of Machine Unlearning [43.272767023563254]
Recent regulations require that private information about a user can be removed from computer systems in general and from ML models in particular upon request.
This phenomenon calls for a new paradigm, namely machine unlearning, to make ML models forget about particular data.
We seek to provide a thorough investigation of machine unlearning in its definitions, scenarios, mechanisms, and applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-06T08:51:53Z) - Survey: Leakage and Privacy at Inference Time [59.957056214792665]
Leakage of data from publicly available Machine Learning (ML) models is an area of growing significance.
We focus on inference-time leakage, as the most likely scenario for publicly available models.
We propose a taxonomy across involuntary and malevolent leakage, available defences, followed by the currently available assessment metrics and applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-04T12:59:16Z) - Automated Machine Learning Techniques for Data Streams [91.3755431537592]
This paper surveys the state-of-the-art open-source AutoML tools, applies them to data collected from streams, and measures how their performance changes over time.
The results show that off-the-shelf AutoML tools can provide satisfactory results but in the presence of concept drift, detection or adaptation techniques have to be applied to maintain the predictive accuracy over time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-14T11:42:46Z) - SoK: Training Machine Learning Models over Multiple Sources with Privacy
Preservation [1.567576360103422]
High-quality training data from multiple data controllers with privacy preservation is a key challenge to train high-quality machine learning models.
Both academia researchers and industrial vendors are strongly motivated to propose two main-stream folders of solutions: 1) Secure Multi-party Learning (MPL for short); and 2) Federated Learning (FL for short)
These two solutions have their advantages and limitations when we evaluate them from privacy preservation, ways of communication, communication overhead, format of data, the accuracy of trained models, and application scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-06T22:24:28Z) - Transfer Learning without Knowing: Reprogramming Black-box Machine
Learning Models with Scarce Data and Limited Resources [78.72922528736011]
We propose a novel approach, black-box adversarial reprogramming (BAR), that repurposes a well-trained black-box machine learning model.
Using zeroth order optimization and multi-label mapping techniques, BAR can reprogram a black-box ML model solely based on its input-output responses.
BAR outperforms state-of-the-art methods and yields comparable performance to the vanilla adversarial reprogramming method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-17T01:52:34Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.