Related papers: AI and the Sense of Self

AI and the Sense of Self

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.05576v1
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 10:54:06 GMT
Title: AI and the Sense of Self
Authors: Srinath Srinivasa and Jayati Deshmukh
Abstract summary: We focus on the cognitive sense of "self" and its role in autonomous decision-making leading to responsible behaviour. Authors hope to make a case for greater research interest in building richer computational models of AI agents with a sense of self.
Score: 0.0
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract: After several winters, AI is center-stage once again, with current advances enabling a vast array of AI applications. This renewed wave of AI has brought back to the fore several questions from the past, about philosophical foundations of intelligence and common sense -- predominantly motivated by ethical concerns of AI decision-making. In this paper, we address some of the arguments that led to research interest in intelligent agents, and argue for their relevance even in today's context. Specifically we focus on the cognitive sense of "self" and its role in autonomous decision-making leading to responsible behaviour. The authors hope to make a case for greater research interest in building richer computational models of AI agents with a sense of self.

Related papers

Raising the Stakes: Performance Pressure Improves AI-Assisted Decision Making [57.53469908423318]
We show the effects of performance pressure on AI advice reliance when laypeople complete a common AI-assisted task. We find that when the stakes are high, people use AI advice more appropriately than when stakes are lower, regardless of the presence of an AI explanation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-21T22:39:52Z)
Position Paper: Agent AI Towards a Holistic Intelligence [53.35971598180146]
We emphasize developing Agent AI -- an embodied system that integrates large foundation models into agent actions. In this paper, we propose a novel large action model to achieve embodied intelligent behavior, the Agent Foundation Model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-28T16:09:56Z)
On the Influence of Explainable AI on Automation Bias [0.0]
We aim to shed light on the potential to influence automation bias by explainable AI (XAI) We conduct an online experiment with regard to hotel review classifications and discuss first results.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-19T12:54:23Z)
Metaethical Perspectives on 'Benchmarking' AI Ethics [81.65697003067841]
Benchmarks are seen as the cornerstone for measuring technical progress in Artificial Intelligence (AI) research. An increasingly prominent research area in AI is ethics, which currently has no set of benchmarks nor commonly accepted way for measuring the 'ethicality' of an AI system. We argue that it makes more sense to talk about 'values' rather than 'ethics' when considering the possible actions of present and future AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-11T14:36:39Z)
Relational Artificial Intelligence [5.5586788751870175]
Even though AI is traditionally associated with rational decision making, understanding and shaping the societal impact of AI in all its facets requires a relational perspective. A rational approach to AI, where computational algorithms drive decision making independent of human intervention, has shown to result in bias and exclusion. A relational approach, that focus on the relational nature of things, is needed to deal with the ethical, legal, societal, cultural, and environmental implications of AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-04T15:29:57Z)
Cybertrust: From Explainable to Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) [58.981120701284816]
Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) will incorporate explicit quantifications and visualizations of user confidence in AI recommendations. It will allow examining and testing of AI system predictions to establish a basis for trust in the systems' decision making.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-26T18:53:09Z)
Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective [54.80482955088197]
We focus on six of the most crucial dimensions in achieving trustworthy AI: (i) Safety & Robustness, (ii) Non-discrimination & Fairness, (iii) Explainability, (iv) Privacy, (v) Accountability & Auditability, and (vi) Environmental Well-Being. For each dimension, we review the recent related technologies according to a taxonomy and summarize their applications in real-world systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-12T14:21:46Z)
Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
The human-AI relationship in decision-making: AI explanation to support people on justifying their decisions [4.169915659794568]
People need more awareness of how AI works and its outcomes to build a relationship with that system. In decision-making scenarios, people need more awareness of how AI works and its outcomes to build a relationship with that system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-10T14:28:34Z)
Socially Responsible AI Algorithms: Issues, Purposes, and Challenges [31.382000425295885]
Technologists and AI researchers have a responsibility to develop trustworthy AI systems. To build long-lasting trust between AI and human beings, we argue that the key is to think beyond algorithmic fairness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-01T17:34:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.