The CLEAR Benchmark: Continual LEArning on Real-World Imagery

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.06289v1
• Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 09:09:09 GMT
• Title: The CLEAR Benchmark: Continual LEArning on Real-World Imagery
• Authors: Zhiqiu Lin, Jia Shi, Deepak Pathak, Deva Ramanan
• Abstract summary: Continual learning (CL) is widely regarded as crucial challenge for lifelong AI. We introduce CLEAR, the first continual image classification benchmark dataset with a natural temporal evolution of visual concepts. We find that a simple unsupervised pre-training step can already boost state-of-the-art CL algorithms.
• Score: 77.98377088698984
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Continual learning (CL) is widely regarded as crucial challenge for lifelong AI. However, existing CL benchmarks, e.g. Permuted-MNIST and Split-CIFAR, make use of artificial temporal variation and do not align with or generalize to the real-world. In this paper, we introduce CLEAR, the first continual image classification benchmark dataset with a natural temporal evolution of visual concepts in the real world that spans a decade (2004-2014). We build CLEAR from existing large-scale image collections (YFCC100M) through a novel and scalable low-cost approach to visio-linguistic dataset curation. Our pipeline makes use of pretrained vision-language models (e.g. CLIP) to interactively build labeled datasets, which are further validated with crowd-sourcing to remove errors and even inappropriate images (hidden in original YFCC100M). The major strength of CLEAR over prior CL benchmarks is the smooth temporal evolution of visual concepts with real-world imagery, including both high-quality labeled data along with abundant unlabeled samples per time period for continual semi-supervised learning. We find that a simple unsupervised pre-training step can already boost state-of-the-art CL algorithms that only utilize fully-supervised data. Our analysis also reveals that mainstream CL evaluation protocols that train and test on iid data artificially inflate performance of CL system. To address this, we propose novel "streaming" protocols for CL that always test on the (near) future. Interestingly, streaming protocols (a) can simplify dataset curation since today's testset can be repurposed for tomorrow's trainset and (b) can produce more generalizable models with more accurate estimates of performance since all labeled data from each time-period is used for both training and testing (unlike classic iid train-test splits).

Related papers

• Density Distribution-based Learning Framework for Addressing Online Continual Learning Challenges [4.715630709185073]
  We introduce a density distribution-based learning framework for online Continual Learning. Our framework achieves superior average accuracy and time-space efficiency. Our method outperforms popular CL approaches by a significant margin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T09:21:28Z)
• Retrieval-Enhanced Contrastive Vision-Text Models [61.783728119255365]
  We propose to equip vision-text models with the ability to refine their embedding with cross-modal retrieved information from a memory at inference time. Remarkably, we show that this can be done with a light-weight, single-layer, fusion transformer on top of a frozen CLIP. Our experiments validate that our retrieval-enhanced contrastive (RECO) training improves CLIP performance substantially on several challenging fine-grained tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-12T15:52:02Z)
• Computationally Budgeted Continual Learning: What Does Matter? [128.0827987414154]
  Continual Learning (CL) aims to sequentially train models on streams of incoming data that vary in distribution by preserving previous knowledge while adapting to new data. Current CL literature focuses on restricted access to previously seen data, while imposing no constraints on the computational budget for training. We revisit this problem with a large-scale benchmark and analyze the performance of traditional CL approaches in a compute-constrained setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-20T14:50:27Z)
• Real-Time Evaluation in Online Continual Learning: A New Hope [104.53052316526546]
  We evaluate current Continual Learning (CL) methods with respect to their computational costs. A simple baseline outperforms state-of-the-art CL methods under this evaluation. This surprisingly suggests that the majority of existing CL literature is tailored to a specific class of streams that is not practical.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-02T12:21:10Z)
• Do Pre-trained Models Benefit Equally in Continual Learning? [25.959813589169176]
  Existing work on continual learning (CL) is primarily devoted to developing algorithms for models trained from scratch. Despite their encouraging performance on contrived benchmarks, these algorithms show dramatic performance drops in real-world scenarios. This paper advocates the systematic introduction of pre-training to CL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-27T18:03:37Z)
• Masked Unsupervised Self-training for Zero-shot Image Classification [98.23094305347709]
  Masked Unsupervised Self-Training (MUST) is a new approach which leverages two different and complimentary sources of supervision: pseudo-labels and raw images. MUST improves upon CLIP by a large margin and narrows the performance gap between unsupervised and supervised classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-07T02:03:06Z)
• Foundational Models for Continual Learning: An Empirical Study of Latent Replay [17.322679682451597]
  We study the efficacy of pre-trained vision models as a foundation for downstream continual learning scenarios. We compare efficacy of various pre-trained models in large-scale benchmarking scenarios with a vanilla replay setting applied in the latent and in the raw-data space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-30T19:11:37Z)
• Continual Learning for Recurrent Neural Networks: a Review and Empirical Evaluation [12.27992745065497]
  Continual Learning with recurrent neural networks could pave the way to a large number of applications where incoming data is non stationary. We organize the literature on CL for sequential data processing by providing a categorization of the contributions and a review of the benchmarks. We propose two new benchmarks for CL with sequential data based on existing datasets, whose characteristics resemble real-world applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-12T19:25:28Z)
• ORDisCo: Effective and Efficient Usage of Incremental Unlabeled Data for Semi-supervised Continual Learning [52.831894583501395]
  Continual learning assumes the incoming data are fully labeled, which might not be applicable in real applications. We propose deep Online Replay with Discriminator Consistency (ORDisCo) to interdependently learn a classifier with a conditional generative adversarial network (GAN) We show ORDisCo achieves significant performance improvement on various semi-supervised learning benchmark datasets for SSCL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-02T09:04:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.