Combining Fast and Slow Thinking for Human-like and Efficient Navigation
in Constrained Environments
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.07050v1
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 15:24:03 GMT
- Title: Combining Fast and Slow Thinking for Human-like and Efficient Navigation
in Constrained Environments
- Authors: Marianna B. Ganapini, Murray Campbell, Francesco Fabiano, Lior Horesh,
Jon Lenchner, Andrea Loreggia, Nicholas Mattei, Taher Rahgooy, Francesca
Rossi, Biplav Srivastava, Brent Venable
- Abstract summary: Current AI systems lack several important human capabilities, such as adaptability, generalizability, self-control, consistency, common sense, and causal reasoning.
We believe that existing cognitive theories of human decision making, such as the thinking fast and slow theory, can provide insights on how to advance AI systems towards some of these capabilities.
- Score: 43.178630971993286
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Current AI systems lack several important human capabilities, such as
adaptability, generalizability, self-control, consistency, common sense, and
causal reasoning. We believe that existing cognitive theories of human decision
making, such as the thinking fast and slow theory, can provide insights on how
to advance AI systems towards some of these capabilities. In this paper, we
propose a general architecture that is based on fast/slow solvers and a
metacognitive component. We then present experimental results on the behavior
of an instance of this architecture, for AI systems that make decisions about
navigating in a constrained environment. We show how combining the fast and
slow decision modalities allows the system to evolve over time and gradually
pass from slow to fast thinking with enough experience, and that this greatly
helps in decision quality, resource consumption, and efficiency.
Related papers
- Imagining and building wise machines: The centrality of AI metacognition [78.76893632793497]
We argue that shortcomings stem from one overarching failure: AI systems lack wisdom.
While AI research has focused on task-level strategies, metacognition is underdeveloped in AI systems.
We propose that integrating metacognitive capabilities into AI systems is crucial for enhancing their robustness, explainability, cooperation, and safety.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-04T18:10:10Z) - Visual Agents as Fast and Slow Thinkers [88.6691504568041]
We introduce FaST, which incorporates the Fast and Slow Thinking mechanism into visual agents.
FaST employs a switch adapter to dynamically select between System 1/2 modes.
It tackles uncertain and unseen objects by adjusting model confidence and integrating new contextual data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-16T17:44:02Z) - Combining AI Control Systems and Human Decision Support via Robustness and Criticality [53.10194953873209]
We extend a methodology for adversarial explanations (AE) to state-of-the-art reinforcement learning frameworks.
We show that the learned AI control system demonstrates robustness against adversarial tampering.
In a training / learning framework, this technology can improve both the AI's decisions and explanations through human interaction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-03T15:38:57Z) - Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)-Native Wireless Systems: A Journey Beyond 6G [58.440115433585824]
Building future wireless systems that support services like digital twins (DTs) is challenging to achieve through advances to conventional technologies like meta-surfaces.
While artificial intelligence (AI)-native networks promise to overcome some limitations of wireless technologies, developments still rely on AI tools like neural networks.
This paper revisits the concept of AI-native wireless systems, equipping them with the common sense necessary to transform them into artificial general intelligence (AGI)-native systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-29T04:51:05Z) - Enabling High-Level Machine Reasoning with Cognitive Neuro-Symbolic
Systems [67.01132165581667]
We propose to enable high-level reasoning in AI systems by integrating cognitive architectures with external neuro-symbolic components.
We illustrate a hybrid framework centered on ACT-R and we discuss the role of generative models in recent and future applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-13T21:20:17Z) - Fast and Slow Planning [25.91512962807549]
SOFAI exploits multiple solving approaches, with different capabilities that characterize them as either fast or slow, and a metacognitive module to regulate them.
The behavior of this system is then compared to state-of-the-art solvers, showing that the newly introduced system presents better results in terms of generality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-07T23:05:38Z) - Thinking Fast and Slow in AI: the Role of Metacognition [35.114607887343105]
State-of-the-art AI still lacks many capabilities that would naturally be included in a notion of (human) intelligence.
We argue that a better study of the mechanisms that allow humans to have these capabilities can help us understand how to imbue AI systems with these competencies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-05T06:05:38Z) - Multi-Modal Temporal Convolutional Network for Anticipating Actions in
Egocentric Videos [22.90184887794109]
Methods that are accurate but not sufficiently fast would introduce a high latency into the decision process.
This poses a problem for domains such as autonomous driving, where the reaction time is crucial.
We propose a simple and effective multi-modal architecture based on temporal convolutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-18T16:21:35Z) - Thinking Fast and Slow in AI [38.8581204791644]
This paper proposes a research direction to advance AI which draws inspiration from cognitive theories of human decision making.
The premise is that if we gain insights about the causes of some human capabilities that are still lacking in AI, we may obtain similar capabilities in an AI system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-12T20:10:05Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.