An Algorithmic Framework for Bias Bounties

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.10408v4
• Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 19:44:06 GMT
• Title: An Algorithmic Framework for Bias Bounties
• Abstract summary: We propose and analyze an algorithmic framework for "bias bounties" "bias bounties" are events in which external participants are invited to propose improvements to a trained model. Our framework allows participants to submit arbitrary subgroup improvements, which are then algorithmically incorporated into an updated model.
• Score: 11.246046276053898
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We propose and analyze an algorithmic framework for "bias bounties": events in which external participants are invited to propose improvements to a trained model, akin to bug bounty events in software and security. Our framework allows participants to submit arbitrary subgroup improvements, which are then algorithmically incorporated into an updated model. Our algorithm has the property that there is no tension between overall and subgroup accuracies, nor between different subgroup accuracies, and it enjoys provable convergence to either the Bayes optimal model or a state in which no further improvements can be found by the participants. We provide formal analyses of our framework, experimental evaluation, and findings from a preliminary bias bounty event.

Related papers

• Adaptive Exploration for Latent-State Bandits [7.757117209804723]
  We introduce a family of state-model-free bandit algorithms that leverage lagged contextual features and coordinated probing strategies.<n>These implicitly track latent states and disambiguate state-dependent reward patterns.<n> Empirical results across diverse settings demonstrate superior performance over classical approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T23:49:39Z)
• Discrete Choice Multi-Armed Bandits [0.0]
  This paper establishes a connection between a category of discrete choice models and the realms of online learning and multiarmed bandit algorithms. We furnish sublinear regret bounds for a comprehensive family of algorithms, encompassing the Exp3 algorithm as a particular case. We introduce a novel family of adversarial multiarmed bandit algorithms, drawing inspiration from the generalized nested logit models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-01T03:41:04Z)
• Bipartite Ranking Fairness through a Model Agnostic Ordering Adjustment [54.179859639868646]
  We propose a model agnostic post-processing framework xOrder for achieving fairness in bipartite ranking. xOrder is compatible with various classification models and ranking fairness metrics, including supervised and unsupervised fairness metrics. We evaluate our proposed algorithm on four benchmark data sets and two real-world patient electronic health record repositories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-27T07:42:44Z)
• Piecewise-Stationary Combinatorial Semi-Bandit with Causally Related Rewards [5.347237827669861]
  We study the piecewise stationary semi-bandit problem with causally related rewards. In our nonstationary environment, variations in the base arms' distributions, causal relationships between rewards, or both, change the reward generation process. The problem becomes aggravated in the semi-bandit setting, where the decision-maker only observes the outcome of the selected bundle of arms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-26T12:06:13Z)
• Robust Consensus Clustering and its Applications for Advertising Forecasting [18.242055675730253]
  We propose a novel algorithm -- robust consensus clustering that can find common ground truth among experts' opinions. We apply the proposed method to the real-world advertising campaign segmentation and forecasting tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-27T21:49:04Z)
• Individually Fair Learning with One-Sided Feedback [15.713330010191092]
  We consider an online learning problem with one-sided feedback, in which the learner is able to observe the true label only for positively predicted instances. On each round, $k$ instances arrive and receive classification outcomes according to a randomized policy deployed by the learner. We then construct an efficient reduction from our problem of online learning with one-sided feedback and a panel reporting fairness violations to the contextual semi-bandit problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-09T12:59:03Z)
• Incentivizing Combinatorial Bandit Exploration [87.08827496301839]
  Consider a bandit algorithm that recommends actions to self-interested users in a recommendation system. Users are free to choose other actions and need to be incentivized to follow the algorithm's recommendations. While the users prefer to exploit, the algorithm can incentivize them to explore by leveraging the information collected from the previous users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-01T13:46:25Z)
• Federated Learning Aggregation: New Robust Algorithms with Guarantees [63.96013144017572]
  Federated learning has been recently proposed for distributed model training at the edge. This paper presents a complete general mathematical convergence analysis to evaluate aggregation strategies in a federated learning framework. We derive novel aggregation algorithms which are able to modify their model architecture by differentiating client contributions according to the value of their losses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-22T16:37:53Z)
• Group Testing with Non-identical Infection Probabilities [59.96266198512243]
  We develop an adaptive group testing algorithm using the set formation method. We show that our algorithm outperforms the state of the art, and performs close to the entropy lower bound.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-27T17:53:25Z)
• Beyond Individual and Group Fairness [90.4666341812857]
  We present a new data-driven model of fairness that is guided by the unfairness complaints received by the system. Our model supports multiple fairness criteria and takes into account their potential incompatibilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-21T14:14:44Z)
• Towards Model-Agnostic Post-Hoc Adjustment for Balancing Ranking Fairness and Algorithm Utility [54.179859639868646]
  Bipartite ranking aims to learn a scoring function that ranks positive individuals higher than negative ones from labeled data. There have been rising concerns on whether the learned scoring function can cause systematic disparity across different protected groups. We propose a model post-processing framework for balancing them in the bipartite ranking scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T10:08:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.