Explainable Patterns for Distinction and Prediction of Moral Judgement on Reddit

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11155v1
• Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 19:39:52 GMT
• Title: Explainable Patterns for Distinction and Prediction of Moral Judgement on Reddit
• Authors: Ion Stagkos Efstathiadis and Guilherme Paulino-Passos and Francesca Toni
• Abstract summary: The forum r/AmITheAsshole in Reddit hosts discussion on moral issues based on concrete narratives presented by users. We build a new dataset of comments and also investigate the classification of the posts in the forum.
• Score: 8.98624781242271
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The forum r/AmITheAsshole in Reddit hosts discussion on moral issues based on concrete narratives presented by users. Existing analysis of the forum focuses on its comments, and does not make the underlying data publicly available. In this paper we build a new dataset of comments and also investigate the classification of the posts in the forum. Further, we identify textual patterns associated with the provocation of moral judgement by posts, with the expression of moral stance in comments, and with the decisions of trained classifiers of posts and comments.

Related papers

• Explainability and Hate Speech: Structured Explanations Make Social Media Moderators Faster [72.84926097773578]
  We investigate the effect of explanations on the speed of real-world moderators. Our experiments show that while generic explanations do not affect their speed and are often ignored, structured explanations lower moderators' decision making time by 7.4%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T14:23:10Z)
• Characterizing and Classifying Developer Forum Posts with their Intentions [10.452110215035072]
  The amount of posts on online technical forums has been growing rapidly. Most tags are only focused on the technical perspective. The modeling of the intentions of posts can provide an extra dimension to the current tag taxonomy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-21T20:17:01Z)
• AITA Generating Moral Judgements of the Crowd with Reasoning [0.0]
  The project aims to generate comments with moral reasoning for stories with moral dilemmas using the AITA subreddit as a dataset. We will leverage the vast amount of data on the forum with the goal of generating coherent comments that align with the norms and values of the AITA community.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-21T10:27:22Z)
• Rethinking Machine Ethics -- Can LLMs Perform Moral Reasoning through the Lens of Moral Theories? [78.3738172874685]
  Making moral judgments is an essential step toward developing ethical AI systems. Prevalent approaches are mostly implemented in a bottom-up manner, which uses a large set of annotated data to train models based on crowd-sourced opinions about morality. This work proposes a flexible top-down framework to steer (Large) Language Models (LMs) to perform moral reasoning with well-established moral theories from interdisciplinary research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-29T15:57:32Z)
• Analyzing Norm Violations in Live-Stream Chat [49.120561596550395]
  We study the first NLP study dedicated to detecting norm violations in conversations on live-streaming platforms. We define norm violation categories in live-stream chats and annotate 4,583 moderated comments from Twitch. Our results show that appropriate contextual information can boost moderation performance by 35%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T05:58:27Z)
• MoralDial: A Framework to Train and Evaluate Moral Dialogue Systems via Moral Discussions [71.25236662907056]
  A moral dialogue system aligned with users' values could enhance conversation engagement and user connections. We propose a framework, MoralDial, to train and evaluate moral dialogue systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-21T02:21:37Z)
• Hate Speech and Counter Speech Detection: Conversational Context Does Matter [7.333666276087548]
  This paper investigates the role of conversational context in the annotation and detection of online hate and counter speech. We created a context-aware dataset for a 3-way classification task on Reddit comments: hate speech, counter speech, or neutral.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-13T19:05:44Z)
• Beyond Plain Toxic: Detection of Inappropriate Statements on Flammable Topics for the Russian Language [76.58220021791955]
  We present two text collections labelled according to binary notion of inapropriateness and a multinomial notion of sensitive topic. To objectivise the notion of inappropriateness, we define it in a data-driven way though crowdsourcing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-04T15:59:06Z)
• Designing for Engaging with News using Moral Framing towards Bridging Ideological Divides [6.177805579183265]
  We present our work designing systems for addressing ideological division through educating U.S. news consumers to engage using a framework of fundamental human values known as Moral Foundations. We design and implement a series of new features that encourage users to challenge their understanding of opposing views. We conduct a field evaluation of each design with 71 participants in total over a period of 6-8 days, finding evidence suggesting users learned to re-frame their discourse in moral values of the opposing side.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-27T07:20:48Z)
• Helping users discover perspectives: Enhancing opinion mining with joint topic models [5.2424255020469595]
  This paper explores how opinion mining can be enhanced with joint topic modeling. We evaluate four joint topic models (TAM, JST, VODUM, and LAM) in a user study assessing human understandability of the extracted perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-23T16:13:06Z)
• A Unified Dual-view Model for Review Summarization and Sentiment Classification with Inconsistency Loss [51.448615489097236]
  Acquiring accurate summarization and sentiment from user reviews is an essential component of modern e-commerce platforms. We propose a novel dual-view model that jointly improves the performance of these two tasks. Experiment results on four real-world datasets from different domains demonstrate the effectiveness of our model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-02T13:34:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.