Physics-informed neural networks for non-Newtonian fluid thermo-mechanical problems: an application to rubber calendering process

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.13389v1
• Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 17:54:44 GMT
• Title: Physics-informed neural networks for non-Newtonian fluid thermo-mechanical problems: an application to rubber calendering process
• Authors: Thi Nguyen Khoa Nguyen, Thibault Dairay, Rapha\"el Meunier, Mathilde Mougeot
• Abstract summary: We present an application of PINNs to a non-Newtonian fluid thermo-mechanical problem which is often considered in the rubber calendering process. We study the impact of the placement of the sensors and the distribution of unsupervised points on the performance of PINNs. We also investigate the capability of PINNs to identify unknown physical parameters from the measurements captured by sensors.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) have gained much attention in various fields of engineering thanks to their capability of incorporating physical laws into the models. However, the assessment of PINNs in industrial applications involving coupling between mechanical and thermal fields is still an active research topic. In this work, we present an application of PINNs to a non-Newtonian fluid thermo-mechanical problem which is often considered in the rubber calendering process. We demonstrate the effectiveness of PINNs when dealing with inverse and ill-posed problems, which are impractical to be solved by classical numerical discretization methods. We study the impact of the placement of the sensors and the distribution of unsupervised points on the performance of PINNs in a problem of inferring hidden physical fields from some partial data. We also investigate the capability of PINNs to identify unknown physical parameters from the measurements captured by sensors. The effect of noisy measurements is also considered throughout this work. The results of this paper demonstrate that in the problem of identification, PINNs can successfully estimate the unknown parameters using only the measurements on the sensors. In ill-posed problems where boundary conditions are not completely defined, even though the placement of the sensors and the distribution of unsupervised points have a great impact on PINNs performance, we show that the algorithm is able to infer the hidden physics from local measurements.

Related papers

• Physics-informed neural networks need a physicist to be accurate: the case of mass and heat transport in Fischer-Tropsch catalyst particles [0.3926357402982764]
  Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) have emerged as an influential technology, merging the swift and automated capabilities of machine learning with the precision and dependability of simulations grounded in theoretical physics. However, wide adoption of PINNs is still hindered by reliability issues, particularly at extreme ends of the input parameter ranges. We propose a domain knowledge-based modifications to the PINN architecture ensuring its correct behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T08:55:31Z)
• Response Estimation and System Identification of Dynamical Systems via Physics-Informed Neural Networks [0.0]
  This paper explores the use of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for the identification and estimation of dynamical systems. PINNs offer a unique advantage by embedding known physical laws directly into the neural network's loss function, allowing for simple embedding of complex phenomena. The results demonstrate that PINNs deliver an efficient tool across all aforementioned tasks, even in presence of modelling errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T08:58:30Z)
• PINNfluence: Influence Functions for Physics-Informed Neural Networks [47.27512105490682]
  Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a flexible and promising application of deep learning to partial differential equations in the physical sciences. We explore the application of influence functions (IFs) to validate and debug PINNs post-hoc.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-13T16:23:17Z)
• Uncertainty quantification for noisy inputs-outputs in physics-informed neural networks and neural operators [2.07180164747172]
  We introduce a Bayesian approach to quantify uncertainty arising from noisy inputs-outputs in neural networks (PINNs) and neural operators (NOs) PINNs incorporate physics by including physics-informed terms via automatic differentiation, either in the loss function or the likelihood, and often take as input the spatial-temporal coordinate. We show that this approach can be seamlessly integrated into PINNs and NOs, when they are employed to encode the physical information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-19T08:18:26Z)
• Lie Point Symmetry and Physics Informed Networks [59.56218517113066]
  We propose a loss function that informs the network about Lie point symmetries in the same way that PINN models try to enforce the underlying PDE through a loss function. Our symmetry loss ensures that the infinitesimal generators of the Lie group conserve the PDE solutions. Empirical evaluations indicate that the inductive bias introduced by the Lie point symmetries of the PDEs greatly boosts the sample efficiency of PINNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-07T19:07:16Z)
• Correcting model misspecification in physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) [2.07180164747172]
  We present a general approach to correct the misspecified physical models in PINNs for discovering governing equations. We employ other deep neural networks (DNNs) to model the discrepancy between the imperfect models and the observational data. We envision that the proposed approach will extend the applications of PINNs for discovering governing equations in problems where the physico-chemical or biological processes are not well understood.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T19:25:52Z)
• $\Delta$-PINNs: physics-informed neural networks on complex geometries [2.1485350418225244]
  Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have demonstrated promise in solving forward and inverse problems involving partial differential equations. To date, there is no clear way to inform PINNs about the topology of the domain where the problem is being solved. We propose a novel positional encoding mechanism for PINNs based on the eigenfunctions of the Laplace-Beltrami operator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-08T18:03:19Z)
• Auto-PINN: Understanding and Optimizing Physics-Informed Neural Architecture [77.59766598165551]
  Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are revolutionizing science and engineering practice by bringing together the power of deep learning to bear on scientific computation. Here, we propose Auto-PINN, which employs Neural Architecture Search (NAS) techniques to PINN design. A comprehensive set of pre-experiments using standard PDE benchmarks allows us to probe the structure-performance relationship in PINNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-27T03:24:31Z)
• Revisiting PINNs: Generative Adversarial Physics-informed Neural Networks and Point-weighting Method [70.19159220248805]
  Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) provide a deep learning framework for numerically solving partial differential equations (PDEs) We propose the generative adversarial neural network (GA-PINN), which integrates the generative adversarial (GA) mechanism with the structure of PINNs. Inspired from the weighting strategy of the Adaboost method, we then introduce a point-weighting (PW) method to improve the training efficiency of PINNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-18T06:50:44Z)
• Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networks [55.83255669840384]
  Recent work in scientific machine learning has developed so-called physics-informed neural network (PINN) models. We demonstrate that, while existing PINN methodologies can learn good models for relatively trivial problems, they can easily fail to learn relevant physical phenomena even for simple PDEs. We show that these possible failure modes are not due to the lack of expressivity in the NN architecture, but that the PINN's setup makes the loss landscape very hard to optimize.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-02T16:06:45Z)
• Simultaneous boundary shape estimation and velocity field de-noising in Magnetic Resonance Velocimetry using Physics-informed Neural Networks [70.7321040534471]
  Magnetic resonance velocimetry (MRV) is a non-invasive technique widely used in medicine and engineering to measure the velocity field of a fluid. Previous studies have required the shape of the boundary (for example, a blood vessel) to be known a priori. We present a physics-informed neural network that instead uses the noisy MRV data alone to infer the most likely boundary shape and de-noised velocity field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-16T12:56:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.