Governing online goods: Maturity and formalization in Minecraft, Reddit,
and World of Warcraft communities
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.01317v1
- Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 22:45:21 GMT
- Title: Governing online goods: Maturity and formalization in Minecraft, Reddit,
and World of Warcraft communities
- Authors: Seth Frey, Qiankun Zhong, Beril Bulat, William D. Weisman, Caitlyn
Liu, Stephen Fujimoto, Hannah M. Wang, Charles M. Schweik
- Abstract summary: Building a successful community means governing active populations and limited resources.
This study applies institutional analysis frameworks to 80,000 communities across 3 platforms: the sandbox game Minecraft, the MMO game World of Warcraft, and Reddit.
We find that online communities employ similar governance styles across platforms, strongly favoring "weak" norms to "strong" requirements.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Building a successful community means governing active populations and
limited resources. This challenge often requires communities to design formal
governance systems from scratch. But the characteristics of successful
institutional designs are unclear. Communities that are more mature and
established may have more elaborate formal policy systems. Alternatively, they
may require less formalization precisely because of their maturity. Indeed,
scholars often downplay the role that formal rules relative to unwritten rules,
norms, and values. But in a community with formal rules, decisions are more
consistent, transparent, and legitimate. To understand the relationship of
formal institutions to community maturity and governance style, we conduct a
large-scale quantitative analysis applying institutional analysis frameworks of
self-governance scholar Elinor Ostrom to 80,000 communities across 3 platforms:
the sandbox game Minecraft, the MMO game World of Warcraft, and Reddit. We
classify communities' written rules to test predictors of institutional
formalization. From this analysis we extract two major findings. First,
institutional formalization, the size and complexity of an online community's
governance system, is generally positively associated with maturity, as
measured by age, population size, or degree of user engagement. Second, we find
that online communities employ similar governance styles across platforms,
strongly favoring "weak" norms to "strong" requirements. These findings suggest
that designers and founders of online communities converge on styles of
governance practice that are correlated with successful self-governance. With
deeper insights into the patterns of successful self-governance, we can help
more communities overcome the challenges of self-governance and create for
their members powerful experiences of shared meaning and collective
empowerment.
Related papers
- From Experts to the Public: Governing Multimodal Language Models in Politically Sensitive Video Analysis [48.14390493099495]
This paper examines the governance of large language models (MM-LLMs) through individual and collective deliberation.
We conducted a two-step study: first, interviews with 10 journalists established a baseline understanding of expert video interpretation; second, 114 individuals from the general public engaged in deliberation using Inclusive.AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-15T03:17:38Z) - ValueScope: Unveiling Implicit Norms and Values via Return Potential Model of Social Interactions [47.85181608392683]
We employ ValueScope to dissect and analyze linguistic and stylistic expressions across 13 Reddit communities.
Our analysis provides a quantitative foundation showing that even closely related communities exhibit remarkably diverse norms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-02T17:51:27Z) - Perceptions of Moderators as a Large-Scale Measure of Online Community Governance [13.80648276848838]
We label 1.89 million posts and comments made on reddit over an 18 month period.
We identify types of communities where moderators are perceived particularly positively and negatively.
We show that strict rule enforcement is linked to more favorable perceptions of moderators of communities dedicated to certain topics, such as news communities, than others.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-29T22:43:12Z) - Do We Run How We Say We Run? Formalization and Practice of Governance in
OSS Communities [1.922428808969909]
This study looks at the Apache Software Foundation Incubator program and 208 projects it supports.
We assemble a scalable, semantic pipeline to discover and analyze the governance behavior of projects from their mailing lists.
Our findings indicate that while communities observe formal requirements and policies as extensively as they are defined, their day-to-day governance focus does not dwell on topics that see most formal policy-making.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-25T16:04:11Z) - ChatRule: Mining Logical Rules with Large Language Models for Knowledge
Graph Reasoning [107.61997887260056]
We propose a novel framework, ChatRule, unleashing the power of large language models for mining logical rules over knowledge graphs.
Specifically, the framework is initiated with an LLM-based rule generator, leveraging both the semantic and structural information of KGs.
To refine the generated rules, a rule ranking module estimates the rule quality by incorporating facts from existing KGs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-04T11:38:02Z) - Measuring Commonality in Recommendation of Cultural Content: Recommender
Systems to Enhance Cultural Citizenship [67.5613995938273]
We introduce commonality as a new measure that reflects the degree to which recommendations familiarize a given user population with specified categories of cultural content.
Our results demonstrate that commonality captures a property of system behavior complementary to existing metrics and suggest the need for alternative, non-personalized interventions in recommender systems oriented to strengthening cultural citizenship across populations of users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-02T19:14:49Z) - This Must Be the Place: Predicting Engagement of Online Communities in a
Large-scale Distributed Campaign [70.69387048368849]
We study the behavior of communities with millions of active members.
We develop a hybrid model, combining textual cues, community meta-data, and structural properties.
We demonstrate the applicability of our model through Reddit's r/place a large-scale online experiment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-14T08:23:16Z) - Prosocial Norm Emergence in Multiagent Systems [14.431260905391138]
We consider a setting where not only the member agents are adaptive but also the multiagent system itself is adaptive.
We focus on prosocial norms, which help achieve positive outcomes for society and often provide guidance to agents to act in a manner that takes into account the welfare of others.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-29T02:59:55Z) - Social Chemistry 101: Learning to Reason about Social and Moral Norms [73.23298385380636]
We present Social Chemistry, a new conceptual formalism to study people's everyday social norms and moral judgments.
Social-Chem-101 is a large-scale corpus that catalogs 292k rules-of-thumb.
Our model framework, Neural Norm Transformer, learns and generalizes Social-Chem-101 to successfully reason about previously unseen situations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-01T20:16:45Z) - PolicyKit: Building Governance in Online Communities [21.20591117254434]
We present PolicyKit, a software infrastructure that empowers online community members to concisely author a wide range of governance procedures.
We draw on political science theory to encode community governance into policies, or short imperative functions that specify a procedure for determining whether a user-initiated action can execute.
We demonstrate the expressivity of PolicyKit through implementations of governance models such as a random jury deliberation, a multi-stage caucus, a reputation system, and a promotion procedure inspired by Wikipedia's Request for Adminship (RfA) process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-10T16:17:15Z) - Modular Politics: Toward a Governance Layer for Online Communities [12.052852910269927]
This paper proposes a strategy for addressing this lapse by specifying basic features of a generalizable paradigm for online governance called Modular Politics.
This kind of approach could implement pre-digital governance systems as well as accelerate innovation in uniquely digital techniques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-27T23:05:17Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.