Do We Run How We Say We Run? Formalization and Practice of Governance in
OSS Communities
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.14245v1
- Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 16:04:11 GMT
- Title: Do We Run How We Say We Run? Formalization and Practice of Governance in
OSS Communities
- Authors: Mahasweta Chakraborti, Curtis Atkisson, Stefan Stanciulescu, Vladimir
Filkov, Seth Frey
- Abstract summary: This study looks at the Apache Software Foundation Incubator program and 208 projects it supports.
We assemble a scalable, semantic pipeline to discover and analyze the governance behavior of projects from their mailing lists.
Our findings indicate that while communities observe formal requirements and policies as extensively as they are defined, their day-to-day governance focus does not dwell on topics that see most formal policy-making.
- Score: 1.922428808969909
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Open Source Software (OSS) communities often resist regulation typical of
traditional organizations. Yet formal governance systems are being increasingly
adopted among communities, particularly through non-profit mentor foundations.
Our study looks at the Apache Software Foundation Incubator program and 208
projects it supports. We assemble a scalable, semantic pipeline to discover and
analyze the governance behavior of projects from their mailing lists. We then
investigate the reception of formal policies among communities, through their
own governance priorities and internalization of the policies. Our findings
indicate that while communities observe formal requirements and policies as
extensively as they are defined, their day-to-day governance focus does not
dwell on topics that see most formal policy-making. Moreover formalization, be
it dedicating governance focus or adopting policy, has limited association with
project sustenance.
Related papers
- Private Hierarchical Governance for Encrypted Messaging [20.838090769270607]
We propose private hierarchical governance systems using E2EE messaging for privacy.
We show how an extension to the message layer security protocol suffices for achieving a rich set of governance policies.
We build a prototype E2EE messaging system called MlsGov that supports content-based community and platform moderation, elections of community moderators, votes to remove abusive users, and more.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-27T17:33:23Z) - On the Value of Myopic Behavior in Policy Reuse [67.37788288093299]
Leveraging learned strategies in unfamiliar scenarios is fundamental to human intelligence.
In this work, we present a framework called Selective Myopic bEhavior Control(SMEC)
SMEC adaptively aggregates the sharable short-term behaviors of prior policies and the long-term behaviors of the task policy, leading to coordinated decisions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-28T03:59:37Z) - Application of Text Analytics in Public Service Co-Creation: Literature
Review and Research Framework [68.8204255655161]
An alternative to the traditional top-down development of public services is co-creation of public services.
Co-creation promotes collaboration between stakeholders with the aim to create better public services and achieve public values.
We study existing works on the application of Text Analytics (TA) techniques on text data to support public service co-creation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-20T17:34:17Z) - Deconstructing written rules and hierarchy in peer produced software
communities [0.0]
We employ recent advances in computational institutional analysis and NLP to investigate the systems of authority that are reflected in the written policy documents of the ASF.
Our study to decipher the effective similarities or departures of the ASF model from conventional software companies reveals evidence of both flat and bureaucratic governance in a peer production set up.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-16T08:10:38Z) - Governing online goods: Maturity and formalization in Minecraft, Reddit,
and World of Warcraft communities [0.0]
Building a successful community means governing active populations and limited resources.
This study applies institutional analysis frameworks to 80,000 communities across 3 platforms: the sandbox game Minecraft, the MMO game World of Warcraft, and Reddit.
We find that online communities employ similar governance styles across platforms, strongly favoring "weak" norms to "strong" requirements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-02T22:45:21Z) - Constructing a Good Behavior Basis for Transfer using Generalized Policy
Updates [63.58053355357644]
We study the problem of learning a good set of policies, so that when combined together, they can solve a wide variety of unseen reinforcement learning tasks.
We show theoretically that having access to a specific set of diverse policies, which we call a set of independent policies, can allow for instantaneously achieving high-level performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-30T12:20:46Z) - Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning with Imagined Subgoals [89.67840168694259]
We propose to incorporate imagined subgoals into policy learning to facilitate learning of complex tasks.
Imagined subgoals are predicted by a separate high-level policy, which is trained simultaneously with the policy and its critic.
We evaluate our approach on complex robotic navigation and manipulation tasks and show that it outperforms existing methods by a large margin.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-01T15:30:59Z) - Privacy-Constrained Policies via Mutual Information Regularized Policy Gradients [54.98496284653234]
We consider the task of training a policy that maximizes reward while minimizing disclosure of certain sensitive state variables through the actions.
We solve this problem by introducing a regularizer based on the mutual information between the sensitive state and the actions.
We develop a model-based estimator for optimization of privacy-constrained policies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-30T03:22:35Z) - PolicyKit: Building Governance in Online Communities [21.20591117254434]
We present PolicyKit, a software infrastructure that empowers online community members to concisely author a wide range of governance procedures.
We draw on political science theory to encode community governance into policies, or short imperative functions that specify a procedure for determining whether a user-initiated action can execute.
We demonstrate the expressivity of PolicyKit through implementations of governance models such as a random jury deliberation, a multi-stage caucus, a reputation system, and a promotion procedure inspired by Wikipedia's Request for Adminship (RfA) process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-10T16:17:15Z) - Modular Politics: Toward a Governance Layer for Online Communities [12.052852910269927]
This paper proposes a strategy for addressing this lapse by specifying basic features of a generalizable paradigm for online governance called Modular Politics.
This kind of approach could implement pre-digital governance systems as well as accelerate innovation in uniquely digital techniques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-27T23:05:17Z) - Learning Goal-oriented Dialogue Policy with Opposite Agent Awareness [116.804536884437]
We propose an opposite behavior aware framework for policy learning in goal-oriented dialogues.
We estimate the opposite agent's policy from its behavior and use this estimation to improve the target agent by regarding it as part of the target policy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-21T03:13:44Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.