Deep End-to-end Causal Inference

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.02195v1
• Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 15:40:28 GMT
• Title: Deep End-to-end Causal Inference
• Authors: Tomas Geffner, Javier Antoran, Adam Foster, Wenbo Gong, Chao Ma, Emre Kiciman, Amit Sharma, Angus Lamb, Martin Kukla, Nick Pawlowski, Miltiadis Allamanis, Cheng Zhang
• Abstract summary: Causal inference is essential for data-driven decision making across domains such as business engagement, medical treatment or policy making. We develop Deep End-to-end Causal Inference (DECI), a single flow-based method that takes in observational data and can perform both causal discovery and inference. Our results show the superior performance of DECI when compared to relevant baselines for both causal discovery and (C)ATE estimation.
• Score: 36.822180456180675
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Causal inference is essential for data-driven decision making across domains such as business engagement, medical treatment or policy making. However, research on causal discovery and inference has evolved separately, and the combination of the two domains is not trivial. In this work, we develop Deep End-to-end Causal Inference (DECI), a single flow-based method that takes in observational data and can perform both causal discovery and inference, including conditional average treatment effect (CATE) estimation. We provide a theoretical guarantee that DECI can recover the ground truth causal graph under mild assumptions. In addition, our method can handle heterogeneous, real-world, mixed-type data with missing values, allowing for both continuous and discrete treatment decisions. Moreover, the design principle of our method can generalize beyond DECI, providing a general End-to-end Causal Inference (ECI) recipe, which enables different ECI frameworks to be built using existing methods. Our results show the superior performance of DECI when compared to relevant baselines for both causal discovery and (C)ATE estimation in over a thousand experiments on both synthetic datasets and other causal machine learning benchmark datasets.

Related papers

• Do Finetti: On Causal Effects for Exchangeable Data [45.96632286841583]
  We study causal effect estimation in a setting where the data are not i.i.d. We focus on exchangeable data satisfying an assumption of independent causal mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T07:31:18Z)
• Deriving Causal Order from Single-Variable Interventions: Guarantees & Algorithm [14.980926991441345]
  We show that datasets containing interventional data can be effectively extracted under realistic assumptions about the data distribution. We introduce interventional faithfulness, which relies on comparisons between the marginal distributions of each variable across observational and interventional settings. We also introduce Intersort, an algorithm designed to infer the causal order from datasets containing large numbers of single-variable interventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T16:07:17Z)
• A General Causal Inference Framework for Cross-Sectional Observational Data [0.4972323953932129]
  General Causal Inference (GCI) framework specifically designed for cross-sectional observational data. This paper proposes a GCI framework specifically designed for cross-sectional observational data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-28T14:26:27Z)
• Federated Causal Discovery from Heterogeneous Data [70.31070224690399]
  We propose a novel FCD method attempting to accommodate arbitrary causal models and heterogeneous data. These approaches involve constructing summary statistics as a proxy of the raw data to protect data privacy. We conduct extensive experiments on synthetic and real datasets to show the efficacy of our method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T18:53:53Z)
• Towards Causal Foundation Model: on Duality between Causal Inference and Attention [18.046388712804042]
  We take a first step towards building causally-aware foundation models for treatment effect estimations. We propose a novel, theoretically justified method called Causal Inference with Attention (CInA)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-01T22:28:34Z)
• CausalBench: A Large-scale Benchmark for Network Inference from Single-cell Perturbation Data [61.088705993848606]
  We introduce CausalBench, a benchmark suite for evaluating causal inference methods on real-world interventional data. CaulBench incorporates biologically-motivated performance metrics, including new distribution-based interventional metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-31T13:04:07Z)
• Valid Inference After Causal Discovery [73.87055989355737]
  We develop tools for valid post-causal-discovery inference. We show that a naive combination of causal discovery and subsequent inference algorithms leads to highly inflated miscoverage rates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-11T17:40:45Z)
• Evaluating Causal Inference Methods [0.4588028371034407]
  We introduce a deep generative model-based framework, Credence, to validate causal inference methods. Our work introduces a deep generative model-based framework, Credence, to validate causal inference methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-09T00:21:22Z)
• Counterfactual Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Training Deep Networks [83.44219640437657]
  Deep learning models are prone to learning spurious correlations that should not be learned as predictive clues. We propose a causality-based training framework to reduce the spurious correlations caused by observable confounders. We conduct experiments on two real-world tasks: Natural Language Inference (NLI) and Image Captioning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T17:47:16Z)
• A Survey on Causal Inference [64.45536158710014]
  Causal inference is a critical research topic across many domains, such as statistics, computer science, education, public policy and economics. Various causal effect estimation methods for observational data have sprung up.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-05T21:35:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.